I feel I lack some context here. What makes you think he thought it should be avoided? It sounds like he said it was hard and soul-crushing, but there’s nothing in the quote to indicate whether he thought it was worth the effort or not.
There are so many people feeling like that who don’t commit any crimes. What makes you think that’s the main factor?
I think it depends on the species. Also, most species have non-flying females.
The faucet is striking enough for me to notice it despite the fact there’s a cat in the picture.
These are two separate things. Men and women are all human beings and are OF COURSE capable of being shitty or good on the same level. But it’s important to give the same opportunity to both, there’s no reason one of the sexes should be discriminated against. Women are still not equal in many ways (the exact ways depending on the particular society).
It’s just a bit of fun. Scientific papers are mostly read by people who are familiar with the way titles like this work. Also there’s no need to understand the whole title perfectly, titles are not that important. It’s more like an id number. You read the abstract to see whether you’re interested in the article.
I’m always really interested, that’s my life.
Well, there were many repeatedly challenged theories in science history that became mainstream later. This is not my field of study, so I can’t judge the quality of their work, but I wouldn’t ignore it just because of it being challenged. Do you have more insight? Is it obviously ridiculous or something?
And spreading in South America.
When we were young, the world was still on track. We’d never dare to be this audacious, to vandalize the language and soil the academic dignity and precision. The new generations are lost.
Getting the joke is not necessary for understanding the article and even the title has the explanatory other half, right? The joke is just a bonus, not gatekeeping.
Or they might be just a sign of playfulness. They can present a barrier for those who don’t know, but I doubt it’s intentional, so I wouldn’t call it gatekeeping.
Also, it’s just a playful first half of the title. The other half explains the important stuf in a traditional way, so noone gets harmed, right?
The fact that countries do that makes no difference to me. The examples you mentioned are all great and actually make me sick with rage. Oppression is always bad, I’m not ok with it.
It is, but they probably won’t do it, because they’re not united enough. Some European countries have pro-Putin leaders, in some, the power is split.
Wish I could. Evil superpowers scare the shit out of me.
Good point. Would LOL if it was not so terrifying.
Looking into history to determine which territory should belong to which country is such a bullshit.
Oh, thanks for the details!