TL;DR

SCOTUS tossed it on standing…could still come back.

  • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Justice Brett Kavanaugh, writing for the court, wrote that while plaintiffs have “sincere legal, moral, ideological, and policy objections to elective abortion and to FDA’s relaxed regulation of mifepristone,” that does not mean they have a federal case.

    Curve ball Kavanaugh is so hard to pin down. I’m grateful he voted to protect access, but I can’t seem to predict his position. Maybe with time he’ll turn into the right-wing version of Thomas and become a full throttle traitor to his party.

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not just Kavanaugh in this case. This was a 9-0 decision, even Alito and Thomas voted to protect access.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        Good point. I realized after I commented that he was just writing on behalf of the court. Regardless, he’s been the only Justice to dissent from party opinion on several cases recently.

    • oxjox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      voted to protect access

      That’s wholly incorrect.

      They refused to consider the case because “the plaintiffs failed to show they had suffered any injury”.

      • FireTower@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Moreover, the law has never permitted doctors to challenge the government’s loosening of general public safety requirements simply because more individuals might then show up at emergency rooms or in doctors’ offices with follow-on injuries. Citizens and doctors who object to what the law allows others to do may always take their concerns to the Executive and Legislative Branches and seek greater regulatory or legislative restrictions

        Pg 3 of the opinion

        No one wants to set a precedent for sueing the government every time they don’t stop a potential bad thing from happening.