TL;DR

SCOTUS tossed it on standing…could still come back.

  • oxjox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    voted to protect access

    That’s wholly incorrect.

    They refused to consider the case because “the plaintiffs failed to show they had suffered any injury”.

    • FireTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Moreover, the law has never permitted doctors to challenge the government’s loosening of general public safety requirements simply because more individuals might then show up at emergency rooms or in doctors’ offices with follow-on injuries. Citizens and doctors who object to what the law allows others to do may always take their concerns to the Executive and Legislative Branches and seek greater regulatory or legislative restrictions

      Pg 3 of the opinion

      No one wants to set a precedent for sueing the government every time they don’t stop a potential bad thing from happening.