• Devdogg@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    There are old mushroom foragers and then there are bold ones. There are no bold, old mushroom foragers.

    • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      There are no bold, old mushroom foragers

      Sure there are, they just have to not eat what they picked up.

      Source: friend’s mom once gave food poisoning to the whole family by serving them an omelet made with mushrooms she found, but didn’t eat it herself. Fortunately it was merely mushrooms of the “fucks up your stomach” variety.

      • Devdogg@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        8 months ago

        “Once” has no effect on my statement. There are no Bold, Old mushroom foragers.

        • FreddyDunningKruger@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          In his story, his friend’s mother boldly picked mushrooms from her backyard, cooked them into an omelet for the family, but DID NOT EAT the omelet herself.

          Nothing would stop her from growing old while continuing this pattern of bold collecting, although a stint in prison might make for an earlier retirement than expected from the foraging scene.

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Neural networks are magical anywhere that near misses are good enough.

    Companies keep using them as if they’re infallible, when lives and fortunes are at stake.

    Tech is not the problem.

    • fckreddit@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah, I have to agree with you. For example, I would have no problem using a decently tested LLMs for engineering simply because Engineering usually accounts for errors and uses appropriate factors to accommodate them. Sure LLMs could be get more accurate in future, but I believe the error will reduce asymptotically. Essentially, more accurate LLMs get, it will get that much harder to increase the accuracy. There is always a price to pay, IMO.

      • TurtleJoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        As somebody who has been through liver failure and transplant, it really sucks. I do not recommend it.

  • The_Tired_Horizon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I remember being on a wilderness weekend many years ago and being told that when you cut the stem on some poisonous shrooms they discolour a sort of blue tint. I’m lucky, I hate the taste and texture of mushrooms.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      I wonder if it fits above or bellow the Demon Core.

      At least looks like this is quicker.

      • baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I was confused as these two person are on different sub-domains of bsky.social (url after the @ symbol). Does this mean they are on different instance? AFAIK most mastodon server I see have different domain (specifically, different combination of top level domain and second level domian).

        EDIT: I see, theur user name is the subdomain, and things before @ is their display name. Not the most conventional system, but it makes sense.