White House levy to protect US makers from cheap imports likely to inflame trade tensions

The US president, Joe Biden, has announced a 100% tariff on Chinese-made electric vehicles as part of a package of measures designed to protect US manufacturers from cheap imports.

In a move that is likely to inflame trade tensions between the world’s two biggest economies, the White House said it was imposing more stringent curbs on Chinese goods worth $18bn.

Sources said the move followed a four-year review and was a preventive measure designed to stop cheap subsidised Chinese goods flooding the US market and stifling the growth of the American green technology sector.

Despite the risks of retaliation from Beijing, Biden said the increased levies were a proportionate response to China’s overcapacity in the EV sector. Sources said China was producing 30m EVs a year but could sell only 22-23m domestically.

  • assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    132
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    7 months ago

    I guess Americans will never get cheap electric cars. Make no mistake. US automakers aren’t going to use this tariff to buy time to make competitive cheap electric cars. They’re just going to rest on their laurels and continue to sell large overpriced trucks, SUV and their EV counterparts.

    • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      That’s what pisses me off here, I just want something affordable to get from a-b work commute, I’m not spending $80k on an electric suv that I only have because I’m forced into work.

      It’s gonna end up with me buying a moped or small motorcycle to get to work at reasonable cost

      • graymess@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s gonna end up with me buying a moped or small motorcycle to get to work at reasonable cost

        Actually glad to hear that. That’s one positive outcome from this aggressive nationalist bullshit decision from Biden. Electric cars (even cheaper, smaller ones from China) aren’t an appropriate way to address climate change. Converting car drivers to two wheelers is way more of a positive move and will also have major benefits to traffic and pedestrian safety. Way better than buying a big fucking American electric pickup truck or SUV.

        • nexas_XIII@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          You’re kinda skipping over a few things as well as something the previous comment mentioned.

          1. Weather. I live in a pretty big metro area that has freezing cold winters and sweltering hot summers (with high humidity).
          2. Cargo space is definitely something to think about. There are a lot of families that have to drive to a store for a family’s amount of food for the week
          3. Long distances to get to anything in the suburbs amplifies issues 1 and 2 (including usually no pubic transportation to help)
          4. The previous commenter mentioned they don’t want a giant SUV and just want an affordable electric car.

          All these things are a reason cars are a huge necessity in most of the US. Yes, getting to an area where we can all mostly use 2 wheels would be great, but we should recognize that doing better is a great step forward instead of shooting it down because it’s not perfect.

          I say all this as a person who works from home so I don’t have to worry about a commute, has a small car for necessary trips, and does my best avoid unnecessary driving and makes sure to carpool at every opportunity.

    • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah, cause now the cheap competitor they could compare to just got pricier so that means they can also raise prices

      • assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I said that US automakers don’t want any Americans buying cheap EVs. They’ll happily sell you an EV just be ready to pay mid-high five to low six figures for it. No way in hell do they want to make 20k EVs.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      7 months ago

      The reason why you’re saving on Chinese cars is because of huge government subsidies on their side, so they don’t play by the rules of the free market either.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Nobody has ever played by the rules of the free market. It’s been a scam from day one.

      • Einstein@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        I mean, Our government could do the same thing to keep costs low and competitive instead of just making them more expensive for everyone.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          So? I never said the USA plays by the rules, I even used the word “either” in my previous reply.

          • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I think what they’re saying is that both countries are subsidising the industries.

            Chinese companies are thinking ahead and using the subsidies to sell more vehicles

            American companies are, surprise-sur-fucking-surprise, stealing the subsidies to make a few billionaires richer

      • buzz86us@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 months ago

        The reason you’re saving on the running costs of a gas car is because of huge government subsidies on the fossil fuel industry.

      • guacupado@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s funny how everyone tries to make China subsidizing cars for its population a bad thing. The US should bet taking note. Taxes should be used to help the population, not the people in charge of the population.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        huge government subsidies on their side

        China’s public education, public health care, public housing, and public mass transit: Evil Subsidies

        America’s $7500 tax credit: Sensible free market EV incentive

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      GM and Ford manufacture in China. It doesn’t affect American designed and Chinese produced vehicles, only companies that are based in China.

      • credo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        These “free market” arguments keep missing the key detail. Reading is hard.

        subsidised Chinese goods

        I don’t remember China subsidizing American products and then shipping them back to us.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          One funnels money into American business, the other into the Chinese government. It’s not some secret plan. It’s clearly declared.

    • reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Apple has been getting the hell out of building things in China — if you hadn’t noticed.

  • gibmiser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Simple way to make this policy make sense. Instead of a tariff on imports make it a huge subsidy on domestic EVs. We can give the military contractors billions, but giving the American people cheap cars is somehow a bad investment? Soon many positive side effects of a direct, non monetary stimulus

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Didn’t US companies that were making EV raise their prices as soon as the government added or increased buyer incentive rebates?

      The greedy assholes basically pocketed the rebate while the consumer got nothing.

      So IMO these manufacturers will just pocket a significant chunk of the subsidy and pass little of the savings on to the consumer. Already many of them claim financial woes, it’s no stretch for them to soak up the cash and say “but we had to…” and get no punishment because the administration doesn’t want to kill the industry it’s trying to support. I mean, $55bn pay packages have to come from somewhere, right?

      • gibmiser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        Make the subsidy based on current prices and only EVs that are X price or below qualify. There are solutions, we would just have to, I dunno, craft thoughtful legislation aimed at helping Americans and not companies? Sounds like a lot of work though…

        Or let me put it this way: do you think lawmakers write the laws they sign? Industry groups and lobbyists write the laws, lawmakers tweak them or just sign them.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    They’re banning 25 year old kei trucks, they were definitely not gonna allow China to compete.

    God forbid we try to save the planet without making morbillions in shareholder value first.

    • bluewing@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      As far as I know, the Feds aren’t banning Kei style trucks. But most states are banning them from road use. Since they do not meet highway safety standards. But that’s what makes the cheap - deleting all the safety equipment and being under powered. But you can still get as many as you like. And you are still welcome to drive them off road.

      • You999@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        The feds aren’t banning them but there’s a 25% tarrif on importing them because of the chicken tax tarrif.

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        deleting all the safety equipment and being under powered

        That must be why those death traps regularly kill people in all of the countries where they’re regularly used!

        And even if that (crap) reason is why: ban them from the freeways, then, not from every fucking road. You know, like mopeds and similar small scooters?

        • bluewing@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          First, the countries where they are popular tend to have limited higher speed roadways and the general population doesn’t want to own one anyway. And some countries simply do not care if you die in one. It is pretty hard to get seriously hurt of killed at 20mph speeds.

          Second, trying to legislate where people might drive those things will prove to be futile. We both know Bubba and Ken will think “it’s only a little ways” and try to get one of these those things up on a highway speed roadway in a grossly overloaded tiny little pickup. Only to be run over by an 80,000lbs semi or smacked in the rear-end by Karen in her Suburban doing 70 mph in a 50mph zone. This is probably a very good case where the rules banning them from roads are to protect people from their own stupidity.

          We kill enough people every year in the highly engineered for safety vehicles we already have. And besides, I have seen people drive and most of y’all shouldn’t.

    • Vytle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Electric cars will not save the planet, they will save the auto industry. Use a bike to get around whenever possible if you actually care.

  • fritobugger2017@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    When China opens up it’s domestic market to international goods then the rest of the world should consider doing the same. Until then, match every barrier to entry.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Lol he’s beating Trump to it. It won’t help him at all, but it is funny because it will piss the orange asshole off.

  • S_204@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m still more interested in one than I am a Tesla.

  • TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    7 months ago

    How can anyone see this and not see that the US is a manipulative shithole country? Champion of the free world markets except when they aren’t winning, then closed market manipulation and government interference.

    The US hasn’t been ahead for many years and they can’t innovate. So now they just want to keep out actual progress.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    the way to do it is a mile based shipping tax on all goods, but congress would have to do that. This is just dumb.

    Edit: it does say these EV’s are subsidized

  • eatCasserole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    Funny how when China makes a bunch of cars it’s “over capacity” and needs 100% tariffs, but Japan has been doing the same thing for decades and no one batted an eye.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think this is to combat subsidies, but it begs the question on why other subsidized products out of china aren’t tariffed.