https://www.statista.com/chart/31152/share-of-us-respondents-who-have-taken-private-trips/#:~:text=Around a third of Americans,the other hand%2C were rarer.

1/3 of Americans take multiple vacations a year. Have you tried not being poor? It’s worth a shot if you haven’t.

I’m literally claiming reality. Scuttling an invitation from the speaker of the House is absolutely stifling free speech. I’ve never made the claim. It’s a constitutional violation you’d have to be in absolute moron to interpret my comment that way.

There are many ways to stifle Free speech. I see people making that claim regarding the chance for intifada college campuses. Being an expression of free speech. I’m amused and fascinated by the people claiming that shutting down an encampment that’s calling for in intifada which is unquestionably. A violent action is stifling Free speech. Well they have issues with a politician being invited to speak before Congress.

The reasoning is abundantly clear. The speaker of the House quite literally by definition is in charge of who speaks before the house. Undermining and subverting the invitation of someone to speak before Congress is absolutely limiting free speech before the American public.

That you’re trying to make this a legal argument, proves to me that you understand the problem here. I’m not claiming this is a legal issue. This is a moral issue and the Democrats who constantly claim moral superiority have lost credibility with this action. If they have a problem with what a foreign leader has to say then they should take to the floor with a rebuttal. Well, over half of Americans support this particular Ally. American people have jobs that are entirely independent on the support of this. Ally. Throwing a hissy fit and refusing to allow someone of that stature to speak before Congress is a very sad demonstration of weakness.

Holding people at the border and arresting peaceful protesters are also examples of stifling Free speech. Both can be true regardless of where you fall on the political spectrum. It’s wild to me watching liberals turning into the scaredy cats that they claim. The conservatives are with actions like this. Hardly progressive.

Of course they are. Where do you find me saying otherwise?

The classic Anti-Semitic Holocaust inversion. LMFAO. You bigots are so predictable, the Elder’s of Zion is about to become a Best Seller again based on your kind.

If Congress decides to stop sending Israel after he speaks to them, then that’s something that the American people will have to live with. Including the increase in terrorism and the decrease in American jobs that would come along with it.

It’s absolutely free speech. I’m not saying someone needs to be arrested for violating a Constitution, but the fact that you’re supporting the subversion of free speech in Congress is absolutely ridiculous.

It doesn’t matter whether the invited party is a citizen or not. They are invited by the speaker of the House once that platform is extended, It’s what matters…

Removed by mod

I’m hardly concerned with who’s the one giving the speech and entirely concerned with the fact the Democratic party is working overtime to stifle Free speech before the American Congress.

Classic Holocaust inversion Anti semitism. Y’all are just so predictable. Can’t handle reality so you revert to your classic tropes.

Sure, you’ve convinced me, anyone that the speaker of the house thinks deserves that platform should have it then, ally or not.

That you think limiting the ability of people to speak before Congress, isn’t stifling free speech is beyond absurd.

Because allowing the speaker of the house to platform an ally who the American people are funding is exactly what the American people deserve.

But instead of having the capacity to listen to a conflicting opinion, people are losing their minds like the choken headed morons they are.

No one is saying free speech is giving the entire world a soapbox wherever they want .

We’re talking about someone who has been invited by the speaker of the House to speak in front of Congress. This isn’t any random person on a soapbox. This is the speaker of the House of Representatives making an official US government invitation to an ally. Undermining that is absolutely stifling Free speech.

Yes, you’re exactly proving my point. You’re running away and hiding from people who don’t align with your thinking. That doesn’t help society. It just puts you further and further into your Echo chamber.

Undermining The US government by scuttling an invited speaker is absolutely stifling Free speech whether you care or not.

No one says they own it, but they are quite literally the speaker of the House. So when they extend an invitation to someone to speak before the American public and that is undermined then they add us quite literally stifling Free speech.

The US Congress is inviting someone to speak before them. An active effort to undermine and subvert that is unquestionably stifling free speech.

I think free speech is the ability for an invited speaker to speak freely in front of Congress. An active campaign to prevent that is absolutely stifling Free speech.

Nowhere am I claiming that they are intending on putting him in jail for what he’s saying. That would be illegal. Stifling or subverting the intention of Congress is definitely stifling free speech.

A congressional campaign to stop an invited speaker from speaking is absolutely stifling free speech.

Thanks for reinforcing my point.

Thanks for reinforcing my point.