• FMT99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    What will keep you safe is not selling your business to a mega corp.

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not even that, but usually this comes with the actual big target on your back: Being publicly traded.

      Now of course, you can be publicly traded without being a big corp, and you can be a big corp that is held privately. But usually these big corpos are the ones that are on the stock market, and yes, the moment that happens everything becomes secondary to your actual responsibility: To the shareholders. Line must go up! And an easy one is to fire more workers.

      • ClaireDeLuna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        Unless I’m not seeing something, game production is expensive. Most studios are 1-2 bad games away from closing their doors. Games are expensive as hell to produce and as much as it sucks the “going public” option is sometimes the only way to go.

        It’s easy to forget but most small (1-3 people) team indie devs probably aren’t even working a salary. They split the earnings from the game and either live off of that or reinvest it into their company but the moment salaries need to get paid, or office space needs to be used (not really necessary for small teams) that’s when expenses get insanely high. I’m not a business person but I can understand why you’d want to “trim the fat” (I don’t support it at all but to play devil’s advocate, I can see the logic despite the flaws). Growth means structure, and structure means expense.

    • MurrayL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Except for all the small studios also struggling or going out of business because getting investment right now is really, really hard.

      The megacorp closures and redundancies are far from the entire story, they’re just the headline grabbers.

  • onlooker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    7 months ago

    All that talk about how Xbox is investing in the Japanese market and then they close the one prominent Japanese studio that they own. The same one that, as the article points out, made Hi-Fi Rush which was “a break out hit”. What the hell, Microsoft.

  • WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Tango closed cause it was the one of the only studios under Zenimax that wasn’t currently making a game with “executive producer: Todd Howard” squirted all over it

  • PunkiBas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    7 months ago

    Such a waste of talent!

    I just heard a podcast from ‘better offline’ titled ‘how managers are breaking the internet’ and he calls these kinds of things ‘the rot economy’, kind of like enshitification but it happens when some completely disconnected suit takes over projects from passionate developers and brings the whole thing to the ground with their ‘line must go up’ mentality.

    I’d say it’s exactly whats happening here.

    • Rayspekt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      Ed Zitron is on a rampage against consultants and managers breaking the industry and I’m all here for it.

      • yamanii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Definitely started following his posts after his google search piece, he is now hunting rabbits.

  • Asherah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    7 months ago

    AAA gaming is doomed, it has been irreversibly tainted by capitalism and I don’t think it can recover. Indie games are where it’s at, typically higher quality and much cheaper. It’s shameful how terrible most AAA games are nowadays because they have to put in excuses for microtransactions. It’s depressing but I think we’re truly entering a golden age for indies and other smaller budget games.

    • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Should have called it Neuroshock as it would have been a great tie with the other “shock” immersive sims

      We were still reeling the loss of Prey 2 and the political duplicity that may or may not have happened with Bethesda and Human Head which resulted in the cancellation.

      Calling it “Prey” was fucking poison

  • Shadowedcross@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Ah, you see, the issue is that it wasn’t profitable enough. You just gotta try harder, devs, it’s easy.

    • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It’s crazy though, they plopped HFH on the store the day it was announced with no marketing push, it became a critical and audience darling and execs said it was a breakout hit.

      What else do you need to stay alive in this industry? Insomniac made one of the best selling games of the year and got rewarded by getting 10% of its workforce cut.

      • Yttra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        I wonder if a number of those people playing it day 1 on gamepass affected their numbers, because there’s no way they didn’t account for GP downloads…

        Maybe it didn’t bring enough new GP subscribers in addition to sales…?

  • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    This really reminds me of the latest wendover video. It seems like large companies see small studios as an investment and take any chance to cash out and fire everyone as soon as it’s hurting their short term profits.

  • CluckN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    They made Redfall, it doesn’t matter if their last game was Super Mario Galaxy. Releasing a single bad flop like that and all of a sudden you need to split the $127 profit with your 60 employees that just spent 5 years making a pile of micro-transactional shovelware.

    • WolfLink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      ?

      Larion Studios is still doing fine. They’ve decided to pursue their own IP rather than continue to work with a 3rd party’s.

      • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Larion Studios is still doing fine.

        Maybe, or maybe not.

        They’ve decided

        I don’t believe that, half of Baldur success was because it was Baldur and gained massive hype for that. Larian’s credit was delivering to that hype (mostly), but if you were following the development, literally the main fear from fanbase was precisely because it was Larian making that - Divinity 2 was very far from universal acclaim in the niche. And this here look extremely suspicous even if it was just about the next game, but no DLC, no expansions, not to mention that continuing the success is an 1st iron commandment in entire industry, nobody stops doing that unless there is no possibility.

        There’s a lot going inside we don’t know because no company would just release such turbulences publicly.

        • WolfLink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I think the company sees this as an opportunity to use the spotlight they now have to publicize their own IP. I suppose we can only wait and see what they do next.

  • eskimofry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    7 months ago

    Even a 9 year old knows that’s not the conclusion you should draw from the closure of Hi-Fi Rush and Prey Studios

      • eskimofry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        That selling to the next buyer who throws money at you obviously leads to risks of getting shutdown. People don’t want or care about long term sustainability and cry when business daddy decides that record profits this year don’t match up with imaginary made up profit growth and hence declare this as a failure.

        Edit: “Making good, profitable games ‘will no longer keep you safe’” But only if you sold your soul for a bunch of retirement money from Bethesda or whoever else. If you are so keen on that sweet retirement exit then your studio was doomed the moment somebody offered the founders to a buyout. I am baffled at how people are missing this obvious conclusion.

      • eskimofry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        That selling to the next buyer who throws money at you obviously leads to risks of getting shutdown. People don’t want or care about long term sustainability and cry when business daddy decides that record profits this year don’t match up with imaginary made up profit growth and hence declare this as a failure.

        Edit: “Making good, profitable games ‘will no longer keep you safe’” But only if you sold your soul for a bunch of retirement money from Bethesda or whoever else. If you are so keen on that sweet retirement exit then your studio was doomed the moment somebody offered the founders to a buyout. I am baffled at how people are missing this obvious conclusion.