• Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s pretty easy: there’s no culpability on either side. It’s not either-or. If guns and ammo and knife manufacturers are not responsible for murder than neither are ISPs and software developers responsible for piracy.

    If the courts don’t like that an IP isn’t a person, then they can pressure congress to change the laws. Until then, everyone can go fuck off

    • doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Although, the primary intended use of torrents are p2p filesharing, unlike any kind of weapon whose primary purpose is to cause harm or kill a living thing.

  • plz1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yup, and you can sue Sig Sauer if someone shoots you with one of their guns. You’ll lose due to having no basis for their culpability, but you can try.

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      the difference is sig sauer has money, lawyers and a few centuries of lobbying on their side, plus being the right side of capital… your average torrent client developer has none of those to fight back with, and is the wrong side of capital.

  • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sue the mine in China that supplied the raw materials that went into the dielectric material in the capacitors in the power supply of the computer that facilitated the downloading of illegal content….

    • Chriswild@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Really funny because you can’t sue a gun maker for the guns they sold killing people. I say funny but I mean that it’s so depressing I have to laugh to maintain sanity.

  • Yglorba@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not a serious suggestion, they’re just using this as a “fuck off” response to the record labels.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe in response to this we should all download a bunch of new music, then delete it all because it’s complete garbage.

  • Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good luck sueing someone that lives in an unheard of African country with a population of one. This is exactly why people release software anonymously.

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    How did the saying go? [NOUN_1] don’t [VERB] [NOUN_2], it’s people that [VERB] [NOUN_2].

  • SchizoDenji@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why is it always that a torrentfreak link is posted here and it’s something negative and fear mongering?

  • drunkensailor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Is why I like to have multiple aliases and always connect via vpn… harder to sue me if they can’t figure out who I really am.

    On that note, it would be really cool if there was a TOR-based github alternative (or even an I2P-based one) for hosting project repos somewhere that take-downs have no effect and servers can’t be seized. Anybody aware of anything like that? then again, I’m not even sure how I would configure git / ssh to use a TOR-based server lol