• Anticorp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s concerning how much support these types of statements get.

      “Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.”

      –Dr. Martin Luther King Junior

      • GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Whites, it must frankly be said, are not putting in a similar mass effort to re-educate themselves out of their racial ignorance. It is an aspect of their sense of superiority that the white people of America believe they have so little to learn.”

        “The problems of racial injustice and economic injustice cannot be solved without a radical redistribution of political and economic power.”

        “First, I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Councilor or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action”.”

        –Dr. Martin Luther King Junior

        • nomous@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          MLK Jr, the guy that has that one quote about white moderates that gets paraded around constantly while 90% of his other words are completely ignored.

          • Jtotheb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Good to see the true feelings of this community reflected in such quick fashion. ‘That one quote’ is a pretty lengthy diatribe, and it’s far from his only time. But the sick comeback makes white moderates feel better about themselves

        • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          He never stereotyped whites as a distinct singular identity that I can recall, it was always about their relation to maintaining inequality. One of his most impactful actions was convincing white and black unions to strike together, and that the fight for jobs and equality was one poor whites and blacks needed to share. In “The Other America” he constantly references poor white populations who share in the struggle.

          MLK Jr never divided people by race like this, he thought that was one of the Three Evils plaguing American society.

      • Exocrinous@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Whites, it must frankly be said, are not putting in a similar mass effort to reeducate themselves out of their racial ignorance. It is an aspect of their sense of superiority that the white people of America believe they have so little to learn."

        - Dr. Martin Luther King Junior

    • psud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      The men who are worried about being hunted for sport have been told too many times that that’s what should happen to them

      • Sippy Cup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I very frequently find that very few people here grasp the concept of humor in any measurable way.

    • Sippy Cup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      No no we don’t have to stereotype anyone.

      Let’s just go straight to hunting them for sport

    • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s impossible since the point was a superficial elevation of their own interests.

      Unless you think the point of feminism (for example) is to make men second class citizens. That’s just not a thing. It’s a rhetoric created by assholes to get ignorant people on board with their continued grossness.

      • H4rdStyl3z@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unless you think the point of feminism (for example) is to make men second class citizens. That’s just not a thing. It’s a rhetoric created by assholes to get ignorant people on board with their continued grossness.

        I think there may be some radicals who genuinely wish for that, but those don’t represent the entire movement and usually only pay lip service to the cause where it aligns with their personal beliefs. They should be ignored.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think there may be some radicals who genuinely wish for that

          Those aren’t radicals; those are reactionary trolls who falsely claim allegiance to the movement in order to discredit it.

        • psud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          For a while it seemed like that minority owned the term “feminism”

        • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not even sure the radicals want that. Anger is an appropriate response to oppression. Vengeance is an extreme form of that but I doubt anyone that isn’t truly damaged would be okay with it.

      • tubaruco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        a lot of women who call themselves feminist believe theyre superior to men instead of equal. most of those are very loud about it, so feminism turns into a term that describes that, even if the “real” meaning isn’t that.

    • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No shit, the only thing leftists want to pull down are systems of exploitation.

      • Armand1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Meanwhile, the Right want to pull down your trousers to check your “gender”.

      • pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        At the same time, privileged people will still sometimes feel a loss of something when you’re portioning out a finite resource. So if a particular group is 25% of the population and they were getting 75% of the pie before and now they’re getting 25% of the pie, that’s a loss. It’s a justified loss, but it’s still a loss.

        That said, there are other things like rights that are not finite in any meaningful sense of the word. When someone is feeling a loss because an oppressed group gained rights, it’s usually because they’re an oppressive asshole.

    • Signtist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The issue is that people generally view their situation not by how much they have, but how much more they have than others. It’s like a race to these people - who’s winning isn’t based on how close to the goal they are, it’s based on how far ahead of the competitors they are. People who have everything they need often see others getting to that same point as competitors catching up, and, seeing that they are not advancing themselves, they feel that they need to prevent that in order to maintain their lead. It’s meant to be everyone working together, but few see it that way, especially among the current “winners.”

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        The issue is that people generally view their situation not by how much they have, but how much more they have than others.

        Some people are that way, but not “people generally.”

        • Signtist@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I considered putting a “some” in there, but honestly, I feel like it’s sadly the default state, at least in the US. Even fellow politically-left people I meet rarely demand resources for underprivileged people that actually elevate them to their own station. It usually feels like “They deserve more! But still less than me.”

    • Kachilde@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That IS the point, and rarely do equality or equity initiatives “pull down” anyone.

      But the Haves feel like they’ve earned their position, and that means that if you help a Have Not in any way, you are taking away from their achievement (which in this case is “not being born poor/black/female”)

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s well and good, but bringing everyone up needs to be done in consideration of lasting multigenerational harm from what has come previously, and areas where we as a people and nation continue to marginalize, underserve, and sometimes actively harm some segments of our population.

      Folks who think those things should be ignored are not actually interested in bringing everyone up.

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think a lot of equity arguments bug me because they often fail to address the real issue (at least in the workplace). It’s a matter of attitude, rather than parity/proportionality.

    However much we hate it, the majority of people in a stem field will still seek a straight white man out when we look for authority/expertise. That isn’t because they are the greatest expert, or that they hold the highest accessible authority, but because it is an ingrained belief. That’s just wrong, on so very many levels, that I cannot even begin to express how stupid it is.

    Some people have spotted this issue, but their solution is abhorrent - denigrate this group. Raise a generation that looks on this group with contempt, to at least remove the component of authority. It will solve the problem, but it will create a lot more down the line as it becomes the accepted solution. Shall we have a generational genetic lottery forever?

    Oddly enough, I think the “blurring of gender lines” brought about by the trans movement might offer a more meaningful solution to some part of this problem, as it erases the categories themselves, rather than attempting to shift their position.

    • FraidyBear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Imo blurring genderlines and rendering them useless as a meaningful measure of power is precisely why so many in power now don’t want the gender/trans movement to gain any traction. If people were to realize that gender truly was nothing more than your outward appearance and did not in any way impact someone’s ability to gain power, knowledge, or success then we could end up with a WOMAN in powerful positions or even worse the women could actually start to gain allies with the power to change things when former white cishet male presenting people who still speak with their white cishet friends about all the I justices women face start to get outraged on their friends behalf.

    • Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Jokes on them. If I want to peruse the expertise of someone at my workplace, I just look for the Asian dude. The white people would be for gossip or talking about food or complaining about stuff. /S

  • wick@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seeeaaalaaab underneath the water

    God damn that theme song is a banger

    • Trae@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sealab and ATHF is what turned me onto mc chris. I was really sad to find out he’s a massive douche bag that got off on kicking random people out of his show for made up reasons…

      The man’s whole rap persona was about being a nerd who was bullied and then once he got the smallest bit of power he uses it to bully people at his shows to demonstrate that he’s not a 4’8 high schooler anymore.

  • gardylou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    ♪If you’re looking for me, You better check under the sea, 'cause that is where you’ll find me, Underneath the sea, lab, Underneath the water, Sealab, at the bottom of the sea.♪

  • Jax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I knew Lemmy was a good place, and then the sealab memes came.

    Now it’s better.

  • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Nobody can give you freedom. Nobody can give you equality or justice or anything. If you’re a man, you take it.” - Malcolm X

  • bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is funny because the cishet white guy the meme refers to thinks it’s his right to stand-your-ground a guy walking around the neighborhood.

  • Toneswirly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Equal rights are a threat to hegemony. Losing hegemony is scary for the privileged, as it is status quo.

  • casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    cishet white men: exist

    some marginalized groups: “THEY ARE TRYING TO OPPRESS US, EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM HATES US AND IS PART OF THE SATAN WORSHIPPING WHITE CISHET PATRIARCHY AGENDA, THEY TOO COWARDLY TO THINK FOR THEMSELVES AND LET SOME OLD WHITE GUYS TELL THEM WHAT TO DO”

    cishet white men: “fuck taxes, man. Btw when you figure we gonna get a sensible politician? Same shit we saw our parents wondered every four years when we were kids, amirite?”

    • casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      before y’all try to “own” me or “ratio” me for not confirming to the hive mind, please kindly reread my comment and explain exactly what you think my motive was in writing this before replying. Anyone who fails to do that, whatever they could type holds no value in my tired eyes.

      • GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you think your comment inherently has value or meaning? Why bother our tired eyes with an inflammatory comment that doesn’t serve to further any meaningful conversation? Your motive isn’t as important as the outcome