• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    ·
    11 months ago

    There needs to be regulations on the size of personal vehicles for a shit ton of reasons…

    But this one by itself should be enough.

    • SonnyVabitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      There needs to be a social cost of owning these abominations. If we make it more expensive or more regulated, they’ll still find the people who want to drive them. If we make them embarrassing, shameful, or otherwise costly in social standing, the market for them will soon collapse.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 months ago

        Other countries require a special license for vehicles that big.

        It costs more, and requires frequent tests, written and driving. The large vehicles are also prohibited from driving down small side streets and using normal parking spaces.

        Because at this size, they’re only needed as commercial vehicles.

    • Wodge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      I live in Basel, Switzerland, lovely old city, very unfriendly to cars, which is fine due to the great public transit. There is this one dickhead who has a bright, shiny red Dodge Ram. It’s monstrous. And it doesn’t fuckin’ fit in the streets, I’d love to see how much in fines that idiot has had for blocking trams, traffic, and all the other nonsense I’ve seen it do, was actually stuck in traffic once because it got stuck on a corner, took 30 mins to get it backed up and out of the way.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The conservative Supreme Court is about to make that a lot harder in a few days. Get ready for the Canonaro to be real.

  • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Road taxes should increase after certain dimensions and weights. Bonnet/hood height should be one.

    Also, safety ratings should give equal weighting to the a vehicle’s impact absorbtion and impact contribution. It’s insane that something is considered safe solely because the occupant is protected.

  • doublejay1999@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    11 months ago

    , I felt physically threatened just standing next to some of the products

    Yes, that’s why they make them like that.

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    No shit? I forget where I saw the comparison but the length of the view that is blocked when being in a big ass truck is absolutely insane. There could be a gaggle of kids in front of you and you would never know until you hit them.

  • MiDaBa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    A truck has to have a nose that looks like a big slab of concrete to oncoming traffic. If it doesn’t men will be forced to wear dresses, sing show tunes while sitting to pee. Thems the rules.

    • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I sit to pee because I’m lazy. The dresses I wear while belting out ballads from Skykid shows are just to assert my dominance in the workplace.

      • Llewellyn@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I sit to pee because I’m lazy

        But it takes slightly more work though the make the deed sitting

          • LrdThndr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            Clearly you’ve never had a half-asleep sit-down pee session where your little fireman played “find the crack” with your pee stream and the toilet seat. Nothing like sleepily pulling up your pants to find your underwear cold and wet.

          • Llewellyn@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            If you clean your toilet less often than once a week, then yes.

            But I get your point.

    • some_designer_dude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      This is a legitimate desire, I think. Being able to see more of what’s ahead is really luxurious and makes the whole driving experience feel safer (for drivers, anyway.) That said, now that every car on the street is a damned SUV, you’d need a damned semi truck to gain any real visibility advantage. Driving a “normal” car is like being the only dwarf in the NBA.

      • tb_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        11 months ago

        And sitting higher doesn’t necessitate a ridiculously high hood; look at any van ever.

        !okay there are probably exceptions but you get my point!<

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        11 months ago

        Sitting up higher only makes you feel safer. A taller car (especially a hatchback on stilts like most crossovers are) makes you more likely to roll over, and less able to make defensive maneuvers.

      • wieson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        The seats keep creeping up higher but so do the windows. And the windows are farther and farther away from the driver. If we continue the current trend, soon there will be no more than slits on eye level.

        If you remember older cars like Mr Beans Mini, the windows went down to the elbows and were right up to the driver. Of course that’s less comfortable, but I prefer the all around view of older cars to the “elevated position” with firing holes for windows.

        • some_designer_dude@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          The windows-down-to-elbows cars were rolling coffins, safety-wise. I think once self-driving is ubiquitous, car designs can be completely reimagined.

          I’d love a periscope, personally. Larry David was on to something, but it’s not exactly “cool”…

  • jaschen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    My 5 year old son loves Monster Trucks. We walked past one of these behemoth in stock form and he thought it was a monster truck. He wasn’t far off.

  • n0m4n@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    11 months ago

    Trucks like this are like having a huge gut, where you haven’t seen your …uhhh feet for years.

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s ok though, in about 30 years after 2 million children are dead, we’ll make a law that limits the height of hoods, effective 5 years from then.

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      We’ll also add exclusions for cars above a certain wheel well distance, which will only further incentivize carmakers to make bigger cars.

      /s but not really, because this is literally how emissions regulations work. Emissions regulations are less strict as wheel well distance increases, so larger cars can be less efficient. Which is why car makers have heavily pushed for larger cars via marketing, astroturfing, etc, because it means regulatory compliance is easier.

    • Sagifurius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      yeah. you really can’t, the cab over semi isn’t coming back. They were cold in winter, too hot in summer, uncomfortable and killed the drivers in a moose hit. Sure anything you hit with a semi dies anyways, but doesn’t so often take the driver too with a conventional.

  • _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The automotive industry must be jealous of firearms killing so many Americans and beating the annual death toll of vehicles, so they’re upping their game to really push us into an increasingly dystopian and dangerous world. How dare you walk or ride a bike!?

      • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m sorry if you’re short… The truck is the answer to the age old question, “How did the dinosaurs get so damn big!?” Initially they were really small lizards but then as soon as the truck showed up in the form of a truck-like dinosaur, then all dinosaurs started to evolve into taller dinosaurs if they survived… survival of the fittest they say.