“This is the story of the revelation in late 2013 that Bitcoin was, in fact, the opposite of untraceable—that its blockchain would actually allow researchers, tech companies, and law enforcement to trace and identify users with even more transparency than the existing financial system.”

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      An article in Wired doesn’t speak to the “crypto space”, they speak to your aunt and uncle in Missouri who don’t know about this.

        • Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          St. Louis has a decent tech scene, AT&T used to have their headquarters there. There’s still a large tech presence there, low cost of living drives tech companies to hire there since they can pay lower wages and no one in the area really cares since you can still get a two bedroom apartment for less than $1,000 a month.

        • dasgoat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean I’m an absolute troglodyte when it comes to technology and I’m here too. Hi!

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      And yet, crypto bros love pushing the false narrative that bitcoin is an untraceable currency of the future.

      In reality, anyone that’s looked into crypto in all its popular forms knows it’s just a ponzi scheme.