• Skkorm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Assholes will get big dogs, abuse ignore and isolate them, then act surprised when they act unpredictably.

    Breed specific legislation isn’t the answer. The answer is for mandatory training courses predating dog ownership. All dog ownership too. Little dogs can be assholes too.

    • hglman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only dogs to ever bite me are chihuahuas, and I worked as a vet assistant for years.

    • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Behavior is influenced by genetics as well as environment. Certain individual animals are more genetically predisposed towards violence than others. Certain breeds of particular species tend to have more of these individuals than others. So, it is possible to have a breed that is violent in that: if you take a random sample of that breed where the individuals are subjected to an identical rearing process more of those individuals will be more violent than average than the average breed has individuals who are more violent than average. (I realize that sentence is probably difficult to digest, but I’m not going to spend 20 more minutes working on this).

      Given the data that we have on pit bulls, I think they’re a violent breed. Not all pit bulls are violent, but a pit bull is more likely to be violent than a golden retriever when the two are raised in the same environment.

    • Clbull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I agree from both an animal welfare and public safety perspective that we need far stricter laws and regulations on dog ownership in general. But also I also think that some breeds are inherently more dangerous than others. For the American Bully XL in particular, we are talking a new pitbull-adjacent breed which has been bred for both aggression, intimidation and maximum muscle mass, both to skirt past existing legislation that bans American Pit Bulls, but also because all these traits appeal to the kind of irresponsible owners that just want an attack dog that looks 'aard as fuck.

      We’re also deluding ourselves when we claim that a dog bred to resemble the canine equivalent of Brock Lesnar is a nanny dog and wouldn’t harm a fly, when in actuality losing control of a 145 lb jacked beast has even led to grown adults being mauled to death.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      And a license to have a dog and a rebate for a year or more of medical care for them, for getting them spayed/neutered

    • BoneALisa@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      When big dog acts out: “ahh that breed is aggressive! 😡”

      When abused purse dogs act out (more frequently and more viciously): “oh isnt he just adorable 🥺”

      • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks for lumping me and my contemporaries with a small subset of barely famous old weirdos who mostly died before we were even born, I guess

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s such a weird situation because I do agree with the criticism of the age of consent being different for gay acts vs straight ones, but also 15’s a bit young there and they think it’s too high. Yikes.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      C’mon that’s not fair. Conservatives would always rather have their kids dead than literate. It’s supposed to be a hard choice for them.

      How about. Wear a rainbow Speedo or drink bud light.

      Now there’s a right wing conundrum.

  • Dr. Coomer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would trust the pitbull. Besides, they’re not as bad as people make them out to be.

    • Buffaloaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Now you’ve triggered Lemmy’s hate of pitbulls. Be prepared for “they should all be put down” and “they’re bred to be vicious, you can’t undo that” comment barrage.

      I wish you luck.

      • Dr. Coomer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thank you. And honestly, anyone who thinks that doesn’t deserve a very special picture.

  • Emerald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I would definitely choose a french philosopher. I’m sure there are many french philosophers who would make good babysitters

    Edit: You know there are more french philosophers out there then just old dead guys? There are many philosophers who are Frech still living today

  • MasterInu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pitbull owner: He IS a philosopher and a big ol sweetie

    Pitbull is chewing on a person’s arm.

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The pit bull groups of dogs, as breeds, are not the nanny-dogs that people claim they were. They are mastiffs; they were intended to guard, and were used for hunting and war. You can train the shit out of them, and they can still revert to breed characteristics.

    A study in the US concluded that greater than 60% of all fatal dog attacks in the US were from pit bulls or Rottweilers, but those two groups don’t make up nearly 60% of all dogs in the US. These simply aren’t breeds that should be left alone with children.