• jagoan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unpopular opinion: Bale happened to be the Batman of the best Batman movie, his Batman is kinda meh. And I wish Afflect was in better Batman movies.

      • Codex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Now that you call it out, I agree! Bale gets a lot of praise for his ability to morph his body for different roles, but is otherwise only alright as an actor. But he happens to be in many great movies with other iconic figures which really elevates his cachet.

        Affleck is pretty good. I also really liked Pattenson’s emo sad-Bruce version quite a bit more than I expected to. For me, nothing will ever be as nostalgic and iconic as the Tim/Conroy animated portrayal.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was a fan of the dark Knight trilogy and thought no one is topping this, but Pattenson nailed it. I honestly like his Batman better now, and hope they continue with it.

      • edric@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Batfleck definitely has the look and is more comic “accurate”. I’m sure he would’ve killed it in a better film and not directed by Snyder.

      • aulin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ahaha! I see what you did there.

        ^(It’s just unfortunate that his name is actually Pettson.)

  • DarkGamer@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Hi, I see in the modlog that [email protected] 's post was removed for “violating rule 1,” which is, “be civil and nice.”

    Israel is discriminating non-citizens like every other state while e. g. Arabic citizens have full civil rights. As much as you might hate Israel, this is not Apartheit.

    What isn’t nice or civil about this post? They shared their opinion, one I consider reasonable, in a way that was inoffensive. Can the mods please elaborate on your mod policy here, are only anti-Israel opinions allowed?

    (original comments still visible on kbin, though site is unstable atm)

    • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That comment is so idiotic and/or bad faith that I totally get removing it. Better to remove it than clog up the comments with a dozen people trying to explain why they’re wrong and the OP likely sea lioning them all.

  • Random_user@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ben’s version of batman was best batman. Not much who was playing him, but how batman acted and handled himself.

  • rifugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Disregarding acting ability, I don’t think Pattinson had the physicality for it; he didn’t look big enough to me to be believable. You could really tell the Batman costume had a lot of padding when you saw him as Bruce Wayne. I think he’s just too lithe, for the lack of a better descriptor, for the character, you know?

    • 0ops@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve heard that the Batman was supposed to show a younger, less-experienced Batman. So maybe he’ll bulk up more for the next one, idk

  • rdri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Deep down we know that doing terrorism will not solve any problems.

      • rdri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        You think they will still be at it if they are given every hamas member?

    • Alsephina@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Viet Cong’s success in reuniting Vietnam says otherwise.

      Attacking villages, taking hostages, and using guerilla tactics (like both Viet Cong did and Hamas are doing) are just the most effective ways of driving out an occupying force, and they wouldn’t be necessary if the oppressors weren’t there in the first place.

      • rdri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        So you’re telling that hamas didn’t do anything wrong and they will succeed?

        It’s interesting how some people blame Israel for being oppressors while others blame it for establishing hamas.

        It’s also interesting how some people say terrorism is not useless because there is “some” history, but others are upset by how Israel is doing it too, apparently.

        • Alsephina@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          None of these are mutually exclusive statements. You can understand that Israel propped up Hamas to label their aggressive tactics as “terrorism” and use that against all Palestinians, while understanding that those “terrorist” tactics can indeed be effective.

          The US propped up the Taliban and other right-wing terrorist groups in Afganistan in the 80s to oppose their then secular Socialist gov and the supporting USSR, and we all know how that came back to bite them later. Just because a country props a group up doesn’t mean it’ll always keep doing things beneficial to them.

          are upset by how Israel is doing it too

          “Terrorist” tactics (or anything really) used for the sake of driving out a settler colonial ethnostate (a good thing) - like Hamas are doing and Viet Cong did - is good, while those tactics when used to oppress and commit genocide on a native population (a bad thing) - like Israel is doing - is bad. This isn’t that hard to understand.

          • rdri@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Israel propped up Hamas to label their aggressive tactics as “terrorism”

            Can’t seem to identify the bad actor here. Would you help out?

            The US propped up the Taliban and other right-wing terrorist groups

            You mean Taliban good, USA bad?

            “Terrorist” tactics (or anything really) used for the sake of driving out a settler colonial ethnostate (a good thing) - like Hamas are doing and Viet Cong did - is good, while those tactics when used to oppress and commit genocide on a native population (a bad thing) - like Israel is doing - is bad. This isn’t that hard to understand.

            I understand that you think hamas will succeed in driving Israel out. Since all the current events are the result of hamas’ actions and the expected process of driving Israel out, I don’t see why wouldn’t we just sit and watch it till the end. Since terrorism is excusable, all the casualties are the price of Palestine getting real independence.

        • OtakuAltair@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Seeing libs both-siding a genocide and colonialism in the present day honestly makes it much easier to understand how slavery was so prevalent for so long.

          Decolonization is violent; if you don’t like it, don’t colonize in the first place.

          • rdri@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Decolonization is violent

            This is like saying nuclear bomb kills a lot of people. I agree. But is it happening in current reality?

  • Dataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    Israel is discriminating non-citizens like every other state while e. g. Arabic citizens have full civil rights. As much as you might hate Israel, this is not Apartheit.

  • FridayChad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    66
    ·
    1 year ago

    No one in the Arabic/muslim world really cares about Palestine. Meanwhile Israel is winning this war on terror. We will never forget this 07. October. Now‘s payday. And soon West Bank will be inhabited by jewish people.

    • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s funny how you claim Israel is “winning this war on terror,” yet everything after that in your comment sounds like something a terrorist would say.

      • VaultBoyNewVegas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Nevermind mind the fact the war on terror was something the US came up with and then badly fucked that up. Dude’s not even a competent troll.

          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            War on Drugs caused drugs to become more available, more potent, and cheaper.

            War on Terror has created entirely new terrorist organizations.

            Could we have a War on Wealth?

    • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Palestinians are not All Arabic nor Muslim. (saying Arabic/Muslim shows how little people understand the difference. It’s as dumb as saying Caucasian/Christian. You can be one, both, or none.) Palestinian genetically are a mix of all Mediterranean peoples. And that includes Greek, European, and Arabs. Also, the Palestinian people are more secular than the surrounding Muslim countries… Second, there is no winning a war on terror. Not in the way you are thinking anyways. Every innocent person killed by Israel spawns new terrorists. It’s unwinnable through violence.

    • ynthrepic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The West Bank is already inhabited by illegal Jewish settlements. It’s a big part of why Hamas were provoked into October 7th and very much why the Arab world and wider international community have been so critical of Israel since well before this conflict.

      Hamas still need to be stopped, but the current war is a terrible humanitarian tragedy that didn’t need to happen this way. The Israeli government could have vowed to end Hamas without a land war in Gaza, which anyone with half a brain should realize would inevitably lead to massive civilian casualties due to the population density of Gaza and how Hamas operate by martyring their own people in the name of Jihad - as it indeed has.

      I don’t believe Israel is an apartheid state - that’s an exaggeration for sure. Plenty of Palestinian representation in Israel. Not enough, but more than we give the situation credit for. Nevertheless, what they’re doing now is horrific, and how the Netanyahu government has been enabling the Jewish settlementation of the West Bank by forcing Palestians off their land is deeply unethical and an insult to human rights and dignity. Imagine being forced out of the only home you and your family have ever known? It’s ghastly.

      Bottom line is this could have been done differently with the right political will. I’m no expert, but here are some reasonable ideas: Properly evacuate everyone who wishes to leave and encourage Egypt to do their part to take in refugees, and any other Arab states. Create a safe, well defended evacuation route for refugees to flee, and keep it open, while you tightly secure the blockade around Gaza, and block/flood/raid the tunnels. Then, most importantly, for all Palestinian refugees, promise a “right of return” back to Gaza/West-Bank, or Israel proper to be a citizen of “Israeli-Palestine” which covers the whole area, after the war. What we might call a “1.5” state solution. Two states working together to help each other. Over time, work hard to find or build homes for refugees and all displaced Palestinian diaspora as close to where they came from as possible. Finally for the stability of the future, encourage local Palestians and Jews, whether they live in Israeli or Palestian controlled territories, to get along with each other and support these efforts with strong social programs.

      Alas.

      Hamas are terrorists yes. But there are plenty of good reasons to despise Netanyahu and his government.