That’s still less lifting than can be found on Putin’s face.

They probably mean the majority of people, not 4070 Ti owners. For them, buying that 4070 Ti would be a better choice already.

Freelancer 2. Will not forget.

Nah I’m just Russian. Our government is an example of a problem, they tried to manipulate Apple and Google, and was successful to some extent.

And I would welcome that. Most other people will probably not though.

The problem is how government entities dictate media corporations what to do. This time it’s pro-consumer, the other time it might not be so.

And what happens if we don’t stop it soon? They will attack… Russia or something?

With all respect for people who hate Apple (myself included), this doesn’t look like how penalties should work. I doubt there are adequate standards of how an entity like EU can request any percentage of global revenue from anyone. What would you do if you request any more than Apple considers adequate and decides it’s more profitable to just leave your market?

With all that is happening in the world, someone decides to spend time to make a meme about NATO being a bad guy?

With “optimized for gaming” premise? That’s obviously nothing more than “hey we decided to allow you to terminate resource hungry explorer/copilot/edge when you play”.

I can’t call ethical an app that relies on Electron.

My point was that the “nuclear bomb is viable vs. other weapons” argument is wrong. MOP is a missile that seems to be specifically crafted for such purposes.

Pray the latest we’ll ever witness is LGBTQ2 episode 2.

What about MOP?

Wish they could use Gemini to generate ad clicks instead.

…Electron inside.

Point is so that you might accidentally click on some F2P crap over there and actually spend more money than you would have otherwise. Bonus points if it’s Fortnite. They love filling it with so much confetti and showing off. Brings a lot of money.

It doesn’t work like that. Encrypted messages will not become unreadable for other clients. They will become undecryptable for users of other clients.

No, I’m not saying that.

First time I read about such thing being included in TOS. Care to link something relevant? I can’t imagine how they are going to control that or ban any client or wipe data transmitted by them.

No, my argument is “this argument about a gun being used is invalid. It’s not used for now”.

I’m pretty sure if there would be enough demand for strong encryption there would be OTR forks of Telegram that would become popular. There is no such thing now. People use Telegram for stuff that is not “1on1 talks that I want to be strongly protected” in overwhelming majority of cases. People choose convenience. Encryption is useless when you are getting reported on by people in your chats or when you don’t know what you’re doing. Stupidity breaks any encryption, see that latest Signal case.