• Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    118
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Cable execs: I see your point. In 2024 we’ll be introducing trash reality shows that feature the weather.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      1 year ago

      They don’t even need to feature the weather. TLC stands for The Learning Channel and no one learns anything from their shows.

      • Marxism-Fennekinism@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’ve definitely learned how exploitative it is to force people in terrible life situations, many suffering from mental illness and/or some sort of past trauma or are just in a bad spot all around, to broadcast their lives for all to see and gawk at.

        Oh you have a severe eating disorder that is extremely dangerous to your health? What a Freaky Eater you are! You also clearly have your Strange Addiction so we can exploit you twice for the same effort! Oh you’re not even living paycheck to paycheck and are dumpster diving behind the grocery store to feed your family? We got an Extreme Cheapskate over here!

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago
  • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cable shifted to low information viewers across the board decades ago. Dumb people watch commercials I guess.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re making people watch commercials on the streaming services now too. There’s really only one solution left, matey.

    • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      All the people watch commercials, but it wouldn’t surprise me if there was a correlation between the kind of person that can watch stupid reality shows for hours on end and the kind of person who watches those ads and it actually translates into them spending money on the things in the ads.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Probably so. I don’t know if home shopping channels are still on the air, but there were people who watched those religiously. I remember when TV switched over to digital broadcast, there was a big to-do in the town I lived in because a bunch of people watched a low-power broadcast station that broadcast a home shopping channel 24/7 and they wouldn’t be able to watch it anymore since it couldn’t afford the upgrade.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      Jesus Christ, I just looked at their schedule there’s a total of 7 hours of TTG per day. Where’s the Adventure Time? Where’s the Billy and Mandy? Where’s Ed, Edd, n’ Eddy!?

      • littlecolt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s seriously infuriating, the catalog they have at their disposal and they just rerun TTG, a show that at the time caused TT fans to be legitimately upset. No one wanted TTG.

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        there’s a total of 7 hours of TTG per day

        Holy shit, I’ve seen the memes but I just naturally assumed they were exaggerated… That’s actually ridiculous

  • Mike D.@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Reality TV is cheaper to produce than scripted shows. Profit is the reason all they show is reality shows.

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t have a problem with the concept of reality shows, I have a problem with reality shows being like 90% of all content.

  • plenipotentprotogod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Youtube in has done a remarkably good job carrying the torch of high quality documentaries and educational content beyond the realm of traditional media. Science, art, technology, history. It’s all there, and much of it meets or exceeds the quality of anything the old guard of cable TV channels ever managed to produce.

    I’m actually only now realizing that some of the most established channels have been reaching a wide audience with consistent and high quality content for the better part of a decade, and yet I can’t think of any who have successfully broken into more “traditional” media such as television or or even streaming services. That seems exceptionally strange to me. I mean, last month there were headlines about Netflix giving $55 million to an unproven director who proceeded to blow it all on expensive cars instead of filming the show he was hired to make. Who decides to hire that guy over any number of youtube creators who have spent the last ten years cranking out a short video a week along with occasional longer form projects, all with a small crew on a shoestring budget. I can imagine three possible reasons for this. No idea which one(s) could be the real reason, or if there’s something else entirely going on.

    1. Hollywood1 is so insular that they don’t even realize these people exist.
    2. Hollywood is so stuck in its ways that they refuse to believe these people could be successful running a larger production.
    3. Offers have been made, but those offers have been so restrictive that any number of youtubers have turned them down despite, one would assume, a large amount of money being on the table if they go along with it.

    That last one in particular seems unlikely, but I do recall that the popular Primitive Technology channel went quiet for a year or more before abruptly coming back to life. Rumors swirled that he had been hired to turn the concept into a TV show, but the production company kept trying to change things and he eventually gave up and went back to doing it his way on youtube.

    1 used here as shorthand for the more corporate and structured entertainment industry at large.

    • SmokeyDope@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nickelodeon gave Fred their own TV show+movie and YouTube bankrolled some popular creators to make a few YouTube red originals, that’s about as far as I can think of

  • nl4real@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh, don’t worry, the same cancer is destroying fun on the internet, only worse because of the techniques they use to keep your attention that TV can’t replicate because it’s not an interactive medium.

    • clipper@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I get that the weather channel is the punch line here but let’s not act like it hasn’t also gone to shit

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I actually do watch C-Span (streaming) from time to time if there’s an important bill up for a vote. But that’s a pretty wonky level of keeping an eye on what the government is doing. I’d still rather have it than not.