The anti-Islam, euroskeptic radical Geert Wilders is projected to be the shock winner of the Dutch election.

In a dramatic result that will stun European politics, his Freedom Party (PVV) is set to win around 35 of the 150 seats in parliament — more than double the number it secured in the 2021 election, according to exit polls.

Frans Timmermans’ Labour-Green alliance is forecast to take second place, winning 25 seats — a big jump from its current 17. Dilan Yeşilgöz, outgoing premier Mark Rutte’s successor as head of the center-right VVD, suffered heavy losses and is on course to take 24 seats, 10 fewer than before, according to the updated exit poll by Ipsos for national broadcaster NOS.

A win for Wilders will put the Netherlands on track — potentially — for a dramatic shift in direction, after Rutte’s four consecutive centrist governments. The question now, though, is whether any other parties are willing to join Wilders to form a coalition. Despite emerging as the largest party, he will lack an overall majority in parliament.

    • Lauchs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      109
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Far right extremists claim easy solutions to complex problems. With housing etc pricea going through the roof it’s easy to demonize foreigners etc.

      Look what happened in Germany with hyper inflation.

      • SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If you look at the projections for muslims living throughout Europe over the next 30 years with current levels of immigration you can see there will be a Muslim majority in many parts of Europe. I’m not saying that’s a problem necessarily but it will be a big cultural shift if that takes place. There is some concern that many muslims have followed their holy doctrine in moving towards sharia law. I’m not trying to be islamaphopic it’s just quite difficult to discern between the muslims who want to live in peace and live a western lifestyle and those who want to live under sharia law and those who want to live under some hybrid system and what that might look like. These are the outcomes whether you want to accept it or not. Yes it’s complex and difficult.

    • tomatopathe@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is the first generation with worse prospects than the previous one. Wealth inequality is growing, and robber barons are back. Climate change is making any prospects even worse.

      Combine that with a communication revolution (social media, to be exact) which allows anyone to pretty much target anyone else with any message they feel like, means disinformation pushing narratives is everywhere. And not to forget, there people in charge of these platforms are among the aforementioned robber barons.

      It’s easy to offer simple solutions to these problems and push disinformation to people who don’t have the knowledge, time or energy to debunk everything and think deeply about things, since they’re busy slaving away to put food on their tables, struggling to build a future, and looking for solutions. And simple answers give people a sense of control or explanation over their difficult situation.

      It’s why I have completely removed myself from every social media platform there is, except this one and I’m only on here intermittently.

      • fromagemangeur@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        True, but the generation that tends to vote far right is the boomer generation - it’s the generation that failed to pass on rising prosperity and gave us the climate crisis.

      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It seems you are more equipped to deal with the disinformation on social media than most of us. Although I understand the desire to step away from the fray, a mind like yours is sorely needed in times like this.

        • tomatopathe@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          That is not true unfortunately. I tend to be very left wing socially - economically I’m more left of center - and that was reflected on my social media as well - either pushing me towards more radical content or stoking anger with more radical right wing content to get me riled up and coming back for more.

          I ended up with a growing hatred and emnity for a growing number of people and “groups”, and black and white thinking. Even though I was aware that I was being manipulated, it was still impossible to sit on a high horse above the fray.

          It’s quite easy to manipulate human minds, even ones that are careful and aware. We can all be manipulated. It’s why advertising works, for example.

          The only thing to do really is to not play that game. Avoid advertising, avoid other content curators deciding what you get to see and telling you how to reason, etc… realise that most people are empathetic, that most people want what’s best, and those that are radical have been manipulated to be that way, sadly.

    • Ab_intra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good question. But honestly you just got to look at history for the answer. Far-right extremism often do better when it’s hard times like we have right now.

    • JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The right has a cohesive strategy for getting and keeping an animated base, while the libs are focusing on maintaining a status quo that people hate and are creating voter apathy.

      • Ab_intra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just to be clear liberal doesn’t really make that much sense in Europe as it dose in the US. Liberals are mostly on the right side of politics while in the US it’s on the left. So if you where to talk with European people then they would talk about the left or the right. In my country for instance the only party that is truly liberal is all the way to the right. The left is socialists mostly and while the US have some socialists the democrats in the US is much more to the right than most Europe “left” would be.

        • JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          From what I see, the center left politicians in Europe are still liberals supporting capitalism. More of a social democracy which is for sure better than the individualistic libertarian ideas being promoted in the states, but capitalist none the less. Still not fully addressing the ethics of the population as a whole.

          Also, I do realize that America isn’t the center of the world, but it definitely has serious impact on what the people of the world see as the trajectory of the future. Especially if (and this is pure speculation) if the right is able to create fox style echo chambers in other countries using the narrative of following the American superpower.

      • Iron Lynx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In this election, the “libs” are the VVD who, as a socialist (GL/PvdA) I’d hate to say but, are the most right wing reasonable party. You cannot project American political discourse and concepts on Dutch politics.

        • JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          When I say “libs” I don’t mean 1 party, just any party that express liberal values. Which, based on the Wikipedia page, would include PvdA and everyone to VVD. Bernie and AOC are also libs.

    • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      We are unfortunately in one of those moments in history where far right authoritarianism is troublingly in vogue.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Everyone thinks that Russia became hostile with war in Ukraine. They were already fighting war with the West for years and it is bringing fruits. It is the war of disinformation and unlike the traditional hot war, they are very good at it and it is now bringing fruits.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Other parties haven’t taken any called for measures when it comes to immigration, now far-right is reaping the benefits.

      It’s pretty shit but sorta expected if you just stubbornly avoid addressing the issues people have.

    • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’ll probably have 16 parties getting seats and many refuse to work with him. He’s not going to be prime minister or anything.

      • jochem@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I like your optimism, but VVD and NSC are probably going to try to work with Wilders.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most people don’t understand politics, and think “guy talking louder than everyone is my favorite guy!”

      • RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Remember that one of the notable reasons W won his first presidency is that a lot of people thought he’d be a cool guy to have a beer with.

    • BlackSkinnedJew@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      NWO technology it’s at the head while all of the world still believe representative democracy it’s still possible.

  • alvvayson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    He only got 25% of the vote and it’s a consolidation of other right wing votes, so there is no right wing majority.

    So it’s not much different than earlier elections, but now it’s concentrated in his party, making him the largest.

    He will not be able to form a government without making concessions. And making concessions will lose him voters.

    So yeah, interesting times, but I am not worried.

    • deranger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The headline seems much more sensational than the numbers lead me to believe.

      • alvvayson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In most countries “winning” the election implies having a majority.

        In coalition countries like ours, it only means becoming the biggest party.

        Hence why the headline might lead people to a wrong conclusion.

        Practically speaking, it’s more important which potential coalition has a majority. And the parties on the right don’t have a clear majority, nor do the left parties.

        So it will either be a center-right or center-left coalition.

        Center-right will be attempted first, since we customarily let the largest party initiate, but it will be quite difficult since we have two chambers and different parties on the right are big in different chambers.

        If he fails, center-left has a clear majority in both chambers with the same parties.

        Edit: need to correct a mistake. Center-left also doesn’t have a clear majority in both chambers. Two of the big parties in this election have very few seats in the other chamber.

        But not a problem, we often have coalitions that don’t have a majority in the Senate. Our House (this election) is more decisive and the Senate more facilitating.

  • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you’re gonna ban Islam, at least ban every other religion at the same time so you don’t look like a racist.

  • TheIvoryTower@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    People need to understand that in a democracy, winning the plurality of the votes is not the same as winning the election. If no-one will work with him, he will not be in government.

  • MuuuaadDib@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Aww…the rest of the world is going through their own Trump phase now.

    • Woht24@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think it’s a phase in the short term unfortunately. The world shifted too far into PC culture, ‘acceptance’ to the point of segregating anyone with a differing opinion, cancelling anyone with an accusation against them prior to any sort of conviction etc and I really think it just pushed all the people who were quietly racist/sexist/whateverist to a point they are loud and standing up for what they think is right. It’s created a shift of what you can and can’t say backwards and suddenly a lot of people who still hold these opinions albeit very frowned upon felt empowered by seeing their opinions on TV, internet etc and began to speak up.

      Just seems like the world is doomed to run in a cycle. I think it’s going to get a lot worse before it gets better.

    • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      At this point, it’s not even weird. I’m just glad they aren’t tarnishing any look I would miss. I mean, in an alternate universe, I could see myself rocking a Chaplin moustache. But they can have the thinning, wiry, bizarrely-styled blond look all to themselves.

    • Darkblue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t worry. He didn’t win the majority. Headline is too sensational.

      The Netherlands has always been a centrist, or even socialist, country. That won’t change.

      In fact, this could be a blessing in disguise: let him try to form a goverment. He won’t. And if he does, he will fail making policies/laws that are too far right anyway. And then after a few years, the coalition will fall apart. And we will vote again. And then he will lose this temporary win again.

      I am 0% worried.

  • Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    the world is falling to fascism. Fuck this goddamn planet just smite us already jesus fucking christ