• AzureDiamond@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    121
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I learned one thing, when talking with people about stuff like that: Most people unfortunately don’t care. Many don’t even have an ad blocker to begin with.

    • joneskind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Look, I was among the glorious warriors who installed Firefox on his parents/grandparents PC and replaced its shortcut’s image with IE’s one (because old people hate changes and won’t accept it easily)

      • Oh again! They keep changing my Google internet!
      • Yes grandma, it’s Windows… (« It wasn’t Windows » says the narrator in a deep and mysterious voice) Do you want me to install Linux? It’s free and open source and…
      • Keep that commie thing away from me, I like that meadow picture…
      • You know you can change th…
      • Don’t you dare!

      Anyway. We did it. We killed IE hegemony. It’s up to the new generation to take the baton and fight against the tyranny of Google.

      • jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The idea of installing Linux on a grandparent’s computer is just asking for trouble. I convinced my father in law to give a Chromebook a try since he mostly just uses his computer to get online and boy, was that tricky. The average person has no idea what an Operating System is and will call you the minute they can’t install a new program for some reason.

    • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The people who don’t care and don’t have an adblocker aren’t and weren’t ever the target. The people who are being targeted have an adblocker, and they’re all moving to FireFox.

      What Google is getting out of this most of all is future compliance as new users coming to Chrome will never know a world in which ad blockers were freely available on Chrome, as well as dog whistling this to other corporate browser vendors.

  • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve seen this one before.

    • A ton of people will complain
    • Firefox will get a bunch of users for a few days
    • 90% will go back to Chrome

    That last 10% will be happier but that’s just the way it goes. This is based on Netflix, Reddit, Twitter, and Microsoft.

    • stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      There were people back in the day who thought that the internet was that fancy E on the desktop (internet explorer) and would have their brains melt when trying to explain alternatives. I think that people now have this problem with a fancy G.

    • Ceraldus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      And thus, entropy is presented. Even if only 10% go to Firefox, thats still 10% that aren’t going back to Chrome. And if this repeats with similar results, as you imply, that 90% going back to Chrome is gonna be a lot smaller a few iterations from now.

      • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Until they use their multiple monopolies to further cripple the experience for competitors, entrenching their dominance, and allowing them to force their proprietary standards on the internet, killing any remaining pretence of Internet freedom.

  • Automated_Footprint@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The description is “Google will disable MV2 extensions in 2024, including ublock origin” and the title is “Google will disable Ublock origin in 2024”

    YouTube clickbait title moment.

    I use firefox btw

  • invalidname@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not sure they understand the flow on effects. Those of us being affected and work in the corporate IT space who have a lot of say in what browsers are used will simply replace chrome with Firefox on our thousands of machines nationwide without a second thought. They are digging their own grave.

    • rolaulten@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a little more complex then that.

      First we need to draft a project to keep the PMs happy. Then test the change…

      Then get it through change management…

      Or just have our friends in secops make it a security call and a priority. Not saying I’ve done this before - no sir.

      • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t forget the six months of complaining and loss of service desk productivity because people still can’t figure out how to import their bookmarks.

    • stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Sadly, their user base is really every idiot with a cell phone or MacBook and not those of us who do as you suggest.

  • Clipboards@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m sure some people will swap, but nah no way it’s a meaningful loss

    Ad blockers will still exist too, they just won’t be as effective. If the layman installs an ad blocker and gets one less ad, they won’t question it further

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Back before web browsers had ad-blocking extensions, we had programs like Web Washer. It was a local, ad-blocking proxy program that you ran along side your browser. To use it, you just changed your browser’s network settings to point to Web Washer. And the ads would be filtered before they even reached your browser. It would be no problem to implement this again.

      • loutr@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a proxy though, so it could inspect the actual content, detect ads and do something about it. Peertube, Grayjay etc bypass ads just fine so I guess it could be done with the webapp?

  • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The majority of people on Chrome at this point are the same people that only ever used Internet Explorer until like 2015. They aren’t even using Ublock, they don’t even know what it is. The kind of people who have their nephew set their computers up for them.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      They won’t make people disable uBlock. They’ll just make it stop working, and people will just think the ads have gotten better or uBlock has gotten worse.

  • Radioactive Radio@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It won’t do anything to their market share. At work my colleagues keep asking me “Why don’t you use chrome?” or saying things like “Isn’t Firefox slow?”. They simply don’t know or don’t care to know. Also Firefox IS slow or just doesn’t work, not because it’s a bad browser but I’ve been seeing a trend of websites being designed to make it appear slow, like YouTube takes 5 extra secs on Firefox to load videos Clipcham and Adobe outright not supporting Firefox on their websites. The internet is a clown show.

    • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Remember the net neutrality debate? I do.

      This is now a balancing act to see how much they can cripple the internet for their own benefit without affecting market share enough that it hurts long-term profitability.

    • Mr Fish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Makes me wonder why they’re actually doing it. How much revenue do they think they’ll gain from blocking ad blockers? Are they doing this for that revenue, or are they trying to tell advertisers that Google ads are a safer investment?

  • MrsDoyle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I stopped using Chrome a while back, but still use Gmail because I’m lazy. Every time I crank open Gmail in another browser, Google whines at me to use Chrome. That grizzling pop-up is now the main reason I don’t use Chrome, and it will eventually drive me to migrate away from Gmail. DON’T TELL ME WHAT TO DO!

    • Fern@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Commenting because I’m in the same boat.

      Gmail was so handy because it did a good job at filtering the spam and offered customization. But it’s doing a worse job at the spam and not a good enough one at customization. Where should I go?

      Proton mail? Some similar platform?

      I’m terrible at maintaining my email but I check it often enough.

      • MrsDoyle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m trying both Outlook and Proton. I’ll probably go with Proton, but aaaaargh, the thought of all the tedious work involved… I’ve got better things to do!

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    The vast majority of Chrome users will continue to use Chrome, as the vast majority of internet users do not use adblock software.

  • ExfilBravo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Anyone that really cared switched a year ago when they said they were going to do this. They told us they were going to do this publicly.