• MTK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 minutes ago

    It’s really cool how judges would say that all human lives are equal but also closely match them to their net worth…

  • rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    18 hours ago

    It’s ok, none of the people killed or hurt were billionaires, so like… they guy barely broke any real laws worth worrying about.

  • tresspass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Insane. My friend is serving 6 months because he fought back against his violent abusive dad one time. This guy gets 6-12 months after killing 2 and injuring 11? Wtf is this system?

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    After those six months, we need you back out on those streets running over cyclists and subsidizing our dying domestic auto industry, you hear me?!

    • Judge in this case after doing his sentencing

    /s

  • Horsey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    for international context here: this is (one of) the hottest major city in the country world; we have year round bike weather. This happens all the time unfortunately.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Sounds fair. I’d expect me smeared on the road by a truck is probably worth a couple of hours of community service. At least a couple. Imagine a beautiful Lady. That’s at least a couple of months depending on the make-up. 2 cyclists and 11 injured yeah that should carry some prison. Specially if it was a nice Walmart bike with shimano part upgrades. Amazon electric… Forget it, that’s at least 25 to life. But only if it had a fancy range extender. Otherwise maybe 15 years?

    Hopefully they learn their lesson and doesn’t become a repeat offender.

  • fittedsyllabi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is good. It gives the grieving families a year to plan how to get the bastard once he’s out of jail.

  • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Remember people, if you wanna kill someone, make sure you’re in a car! If you’re lucky you might not even get a jail sentence!

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Remember people, if you wanna kill someone, make sure you’re a rich white person in a car!

      Also doesn’t hurt if the people you plow over are young, minorities, women, or - best of all - progressive activists.

  • oh_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    He should never get his license back. What the hell. Only 6 months.

    • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Unfortunately, traveling by car is seen as the default. Hence using something else than a car to travel is seen as taking unnecessary risks, which is why we see a lot of victim blaming.

      Speed limit inside of cities should be like 30km/h, 20km/h during the times of day when school typically starts and ends, all day near a school. Fines for speeding should be 3 dayfines for each kilometer you’re over the limit, with five percent of your net worth being added to your annual income for the calculation. 5 dayfines if you speed in a school zone. And if somebody throws themselves in front of your car, and they die, you should lose your license for 6 months. (Though in this case, all financial damages emerging from your license suspension should be paid by the estate of the deceased). In case of vehicular manslaughter that doesn’t involve somebody deliberately hitting your car, the license should be suspended permanently.

      Sorry for the rant.

  • lennee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    148
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    misdemeanor? so like, murder is illegal, murdering multiple with a truck is kind of legal

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      There is no law and order in the US. If you want to diddle kids, just operate a Joint commission accredited troubled teen facility. There are literally zero requirements, and you can sue anyone who questions you into poverty!

    • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      2 days ago

      Meanwhile a couple of parents in North Carolina are facing manslaughter charges after they let their kids walk to the grocery store while they guided them over the phone and one of them got hit and killed by a car.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      It doesn’t seem to have been done intentionally, so at best it’s involuntary manslaughter. They think he may have fallen asleep or something.

        • BussyCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          It meets the exact spirt of involuntary manslaughter. Where his negligence either through faulty vehicle maintenance like him claiming that his steering wheel locked up or by being too tired and driving a multi ton vehicle that caused the deaths of multiple people. And yet they dropped some bullshit ass charges instead

    • Rusty Shackleford@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      So, if you actually read the article, it says he claimed that the steering wheel locked up on him, but the NTSB stated that he suffered from severe fatigue. Maricopa county prosecutors said there wasn’t enough evidence to press any felonious charges.

      So, at best, this would be a case of manslaughter (which is a felony), but there’s no conclusivity on whether it was with malicious intent or premeditated.

      So no, he’s not a murderer. He negligently fell asleep at the wheel.

      • lennee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        2 days ago

        If u drive while being impaired (by whatever) ur a piece of shit and if u kill anyone doing that (except like suffering a heart attack or something not foreseeable) ur a murderer in my mind.

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Failing to maintain a vehicle is an impairment. Also “my steering wheel locked up” is not a reason to not hit the brakes.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          As someone who is a master of operating under what should be severe impairment I agree, being awake for 48 just leaves me vaguely slow when I talk. Also folks need to know their fucking limits, I refused to drive while I had food poisoning because I couldn’t think and also I didn’t want to shit myself in my car.

        • Rusty Shackleford@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          36
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          Fortunately, the law doesn’t operate on what’s in your mind.

          Murder implies premeditation. The prosecutor and judge didn’t see evidence of premeditation.

          • meco03211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            A lot of people use the word “murder” in a colloquial sense and not a strictly legal one. Further some jurisdictions have degrees of murder where other jurisdictions would use manslaughter. I’m assuming the person you responded to meant the lesser charges.

            • lennee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              21
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Yeah im not gonna use a legal definition colloquially cuz im not a weirdo. And ur obviously right that even in a colloquial sense there is a difference between premeditated murder and non-premeditated murder. Im not arguing that the guy is jack the ripper.

          • LousyCornMuffins@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            the law doesn’t operate on what’s in your mind.

            are you sure? intent is an element of many crimes.

            edit: i tired nvm

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      You actually get rewarded for running over cyclists, one more and it would all have canceled out

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Prosecutor needs to be tried for treason. At the very least there needs to be a permanent license suspension.

    • Rusty Shackleford@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      2 days ago

      So, upon reading the article, the NTSB concluded the driver was extremely fatigued.

      Do truck drivers not get tired where your from? Is this incident really an indictment of the entire United States? Is the rest of the world a tragedy-free paradise?

      • MisterD@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        So if someone got really tired and plowed into a bunch of ICE agents would get the same sentence?

      • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        55
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        If you drive while tired and kill someone as a result that’s not an accident. You intentionally kept driving instead of pulling over and taking a nap.

        There is effectively no difference in drunk driving and driving while extremely tired. Both impair your driving ability equally.

        • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          IMO driving while tired is worse as the impairment creeps up on you for hours and you can stop at any time. There should be almost no impairment in your decision making.

          On drugs it conceivable that you took a couple of shots and then your drunken mind decided to drive. In this case the decision to drive was made by someone impaired.

          If you drive in a professional capacity your employer should be held accountable too. People that drive their employees to drive unsave should lose their business and spend some time in jail.

          • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Doesn’t mean much. Police violence cases are regularly ignored by prosecutors and judges due to lack of public interest/insufficient evidence you didn’t deserve to be battered.

          • baines@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            2 days ago

            i don’t care enough about your boss to ignore 2 people dying

            it should be negligent homicide unless mechanical failure can be proven and even then he should have to show proper upkeep

            cars are 1000 pound+ death machines if people don’t respect the responsibility they should face more then this dude is getting

            • ruuster13@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I’m not ignoring their deaths. Send him to jail for a year, sure. But it won’t fix the problem and it will allow him to experience life inside prison. I don’t think they teach vehicle maintenance in there.

              • baines@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                if it was due to negligence, there has to be real consequences, we have non violent drug offenders doing more time

                if nothing else he shouldn’t get his license back

      • crandlecan@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        No, because we have mandatory breaks and such. Every second gets fully recorded and stored for authorities to check. Driving without sleep just isn’t worth the risk of losing your license

        • Rusty Shackleford@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          So does the United States in their trucking industry. This guy just fucked up horribly. He is not, however, a murderer which implies premeditation.

            • JollyG@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              2 days ago

              “Premeditated” in the context of homicide means someone intended to kill someone else. That is, they set into motion a course of actions because they believed that course of action would result in the death of a person.

              Homicide in the context of fatigue or impairment are not usually premeditated because people generally do not put themselves in those cognitive states believing that doing so will result in the death of someone else.

              Historically judicial systems have recognized that those cognitive states are more likely to result in unintentional deaths so do hold people operating vehicles under those conditions to a higher standard of punishment than, say, a sober person involved in a fatal crash. At the same time they consider intent and hold people in those circumstances to a lower standard of punishment than those who actually intended to kill someone.

  • diptchip@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I imagine he’ll face the consequences for the rest of his life, regardless of how the “justice” system handles it. Honestly, I’d be surprised if he lived 10 years before something happened to him. The victims had families.