From age and ID restrictions on the Internet, to charging rappers with “terrorism,” the U.K. is demolishing the most basic civil liberties. If we let them, U.S. leaders may be close behind.

  • Corelli_III@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    “and america could be next!” they literally have domestic concentration camps in america there is no freedom there

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      But how nice of the headline to imply such things don’t exist while pretending to be shocked about other things

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Our speech has been controlled here since media’s inception. We just live in the world of manufactured perception that because we can argue on the internet or have marches that somehow speech and propaganda isn’t a tightly-controlled system.

      You don’t NEED to jail critics to have control over your country’s speech, you just need to control the narratives via news outlets, reddit posts, newspapers, facebook “friends” and popular television fiction shows.

  • mriswith@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    7 days ago

    That was lost a while ago, but it’s nice more people are noticing that it’s getting worse.

  • Deflated0ne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    7 days ago

    Pretty much every company that matters decided to go full 1984 censorship and surveillance all at the same time. And the governments are more than happy to play along. UK, US, etc. Pretty much all of “the west”

  • ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 days ago

    Hopefully this doesn’t devolve into another USA vs UK shit flinging contest. Authoritarianism is on the rise everywhere, Trump and Starmer are both utilising state power to crack down on dissent and opposition. Those of us who are opposed to this shit are on the same side.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      100%.

      Doesn’t matter the country.

      Do you work for a living?

      Do you want to live without fear of governments and corporations breathing down your neck waiting to make an example of you or profit from you?

      …Then we should be on the same side. Simple as.

      Good-natured jabs aside, of course. ;) Love ya, Brits. <3

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Could? go publicly criticize the Pedo in chief and watch what happens

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      The idea that America EVER had free fucking speech is propaganda. There is no such thing, not in the US and not anywhere. Nations have to control their propaganda or they lose their power. Want an example? Just log into your favorite feed-site in another country and look how radically different every post, every comment and every news story is. Our perspective in the US is as cultivated as it is anywhere else.

      The only way we would ever have truly free speech in any capacity would be if we had a borderless world, and I don’t see that happening as long as we have money and classes.

      Short of some alien species descending and absorbing everyone into a hive-mind, this isn’t going to change for a thousand years at least.

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        Anyone looking for “dogwhistles” in ANY capacity at this point is an idiot. It’s like flypaper to morons.

        Yah kiddos, keep screaming about blue-jeans ads and making the other sides scream back, that will SURELY remove the actual white nationalists and fascists who own and control the country. Keep arguing on the internet to give the impression we actually have free-speech. It’s a planned and working system to delude the masses into thinking they have power to anything in the face of capitalism and the fascist system it requires to keep the line going up.

  • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I think it’s odd (and pretty terrifying) the U.K. and U.S. have been on such similar and almost coordinated authoritarian tracks over the last few years. It started with a lot of gradual steps and more recently they seem to be ramping things up (which also seems pretty common for authoritarianism/by the time most people notice something weird is happening it’s too late).

    Both ramping up A.I. to spy on, and control/micromanage their own civilians while refusing regulations or any public accountability for the A.I. they’re developing.

    April 2024: U.S., U.K. Announce Partnership to Safety Test AI Models

    Feb 2025: UK and US refuse to sign international AI declaration

    May 2025: Brexit’s Failures Could Foreshadow Trump’s. Just Not in the Way You Might Think.

  • Gates9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    How many whistleblowers and reporters did Bush and Obama charge with the Espionage Act?

  • Pirate2377@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    America is already well on its way to lose free speech as well. We have a secret police called “ICE” now, so it’s only a matter of time unless the “resistance democrats” finally do their fucking job

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Britain never had free speech and always have been a absolute nanny state. It’s a prime example that government overreach does not result in any safety improvements.

    • nlgranger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Many people seem to ignore that british legislation is choke full of gag laws and restrictions on pretty fundamental rights.

    • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Labour is centrist and they desperately want to exert more control. English are sheep, so no one will protest daddy government.

      • teuniac_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 days ago

        Supposedly centrist. They’re curious whether being populist right wing on some issues will win over Reform UK voters. It’s just that they’re so curious and are doing this so often that they’re well on their way into morphing into a right wing party.

        so no one will protest daddy government.

        Yea this is a problem…

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Someone call up the fine people of France and ask for lessons on how it’s done!

        (Heck, we North American folk should, too…)

  • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    So did people in the 80’s (before internet) have more free speech than now, or less?

    Can’t anyone just build their own website and “free speech” all they want?

    Private media owners always had control over their property, that isn’t new.

  • x0x7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    Don’t you guys cheer ending free speech anytime you are in power? I’m all for you joining the team, but please stop vilifying the people who got there before you.