• mEEGal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        it’s been trained on art stolen from people who can draw orders of magnitude better than this

        • Lembot_0004@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          26
          ·
          4 days ago

          Learning isn’t stealing. Humans also learn by looking at different works. By “stealing,” as you call it.

          • mEEGal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            there’s such a thing called “copyright”, and using countless pieces of art for free so that a couple of douchebags become gazillionnaires selling copyright infringement on said pieces of art certainly feels like theft

            • Lembot_0004@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              4 days ago

              Poor gazillionaires (sobbing). Can we donate them? I can send them a few kg of shit. Or some grass, now it is a season for the grass.

              • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                You’re the one defending the gazillionaires. They’re saying the gazillionaires are the ones profiting from stealing, and they’re right.

                  • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    You have to be a bot to be this stupid… The copyright holders that are being ripped off are INDIVIDUAL ARTISTS, not the fucks making money off the back of their work. Your understanding of this conversation let alone the topic is beyond pathetic.

      • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        if you made a shitty hand drawing, even in the old mspaint, the thing would be funnier.

        do you think wojack and rage comics were popular for their artistic craftsmanship? or because they seemed relatable as they were apparently made with little skill or effort?

        • Lembot_0004@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          4 days ago

          Those comics were much more difficult to draw than you imagine. Try it – it isn’t easy. Those memes had their own aesthetics. They weren’t just poorely drawn.

          if you made a shitty hand drawing, even in the old mspaint, the thing would be funnier.

          Bad picture is a bad picture. It might be intentionally bad because of some context, but you can’t make something funnier just by decreasing the quality of illustration.

          I don’t see how you can make OP’s message funnier by worse illustation.

      • MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        True, but I’m here for human conversations, not just me talking to chatgpt.

        Human interactions can be both good and bad, but its still human interactions.