TLDR: XFCE and Cinnamon devs are begging beginning to work on Wayland support.

  • PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 years ago

    The “TLDR” is sub heading is completely misleading. Cinnamon devs see they have to move, that’s the reason. “Begging to work” on Wayland is not at all what the article says. Before you downvote, read it. Nothing in that article or the link to one dev’s blog says anything even remotely like that.

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Good. X11 has not been properly maintained and shouldn’t be the default for any distro. (Xorg, whatever.)

    • PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      2 years ago

      At least the Mint devs are being realistic on the time span needed for Wayland to have a chance at working for everyone, unlike Fedora, KDE, and Gnome that are jumping the gun.

      • IverCoder@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        If nobody does that, nobody will be using Wayland to report issues.

      • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
        cake
        OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Cinnamon and XFCE are outliers in that they try to be super stable, “complete” desktops, compared to GNOME and KDE that try to be bleeding edge and packed with new and changing features.

        Benefits to both, but I can respect why Cinnamon and XFCE have been slow to adopt Wayland (to a fault, many would argue)

  • Dojan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I feel like talk about Wayland being the next big thing, “coming soon” began back when I was using Linux as my daily driver over ten years ago.

    It’s still not widely used?

      • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        the usual exception is nvidia, a lot of distros fall back to X on nvidia

        • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
          cake
          OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Not sure if that’ll stay much longer, either. I’m using using dual graphics with nVidia and Wayland on KDE works just fine. The only annoyance is that KDE doesn’t have very good touchpad gestures by default, but you also can’t modify them. Boo!

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It’s extremely widely used. It’s been the Gnome default (unless you used Nvidia) since 2016 or something.

      Even in Debian on Gnome it’s been the default since 2019.

      On KDE a bunch of distros use it too.

      Wayland is the future. But for most it’s already the present too.

      • Radioactive Radio@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Nvidia has been decent on Wayland from my experience. Then again my experience has just been 5 days, but it feels snappier than X11 I kinda like the feel.

        • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Nvidia on Wayland is usable but not much more than that. There are issues with Xwayland windows flickering and some general instabilities and glitches. But it works for the most part, and the 545 drivers supposedly fix lots of missing features and bugs for Wayland.

          • Radioactive Radio@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yeah xwayland does has a lot of issues, with fullscreen wine games for example all you see is constantly zooming background instead of the game. But the finger gestures and the overall smoothness makes it worth it for me, even tho I play my games in a window. Hopefully 545 fixes that.

    • SuperIce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve been using Wayland for about 8 years at this point. Some people (especially in the Linux world) are just really against change.

        • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          The discord thing can also be seen as a good thing (it’s a feature). Wayland is more secure and prevents apps like discord from spying on literally every keystroke you press. Especially if the app is discord, I don’t want it to be able to look at what I’m typing in real time

        • PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 years ago

          The video card thing, if talking about NVidia, really is wayland’s fault. The devs refuse to use the card and driver the way X did. I suspect it’s because they don’t like NVidia’s licensing of the driver, and they’re trying to make life a pain for NVidia users to for the business to make concessions.

          • ferret@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Maintainability is why wayland exists. The devs not putting up to nvidia’s special child complex in favor of a unified codebase really isn’t a surprise.

    • mhz (lemm.ee)@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      “Coming soon” for me started when major DEs started abandoning xorg, not when they adopted wayland.

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    How did Mint fuck up year-based version numbering? I did a fresh install on a laptop this year and briefly worried project had died.