Linux vs Windows tested in 10 games - Linux 17% faster on Average::Computers, hardware, software and gaming in Spanish and English

  • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Windows has so much garbage overhead via telemetry, etc. Glad to see someone quantifying how detrimental it is.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nvidia is their own worst enemy as regards Linux. When everyone realizes games work better under Linux and AMD, nVidia will be crying outside the gate. We’re 5 years into Proton, in another 5 years there won’t be a game that doesn’t run better on Linux.

      • mindlight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        When everyone realizes games work better under Linux and AMD, nVidia will be crying outside the gate.

        So you think Microsoft spends 8 billion dollars acquiring Bethesda Game Studios, Arkane Studios, id Software, MachineGames, Tango Gameworks, ZeniMax Online Studios in 2020 and then proceeds to spend 68 billion dollars on acquiring Activision Blizzard…

        … just to stand on the sidelines watching everyone drop Windows as a gaming platform?

        • Almamu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do you realize that it doesn’t matter to them if gamers use Windows or not, right? Windows is big on the enterprise side, consumer OS is the least of their worries, and their gaming division doesn’t lose anything if gamers run their games on Linux, thanks to steam actually. So no, I don’t think that maters…

          Not to mention that we’re talking about Nvidia and having a shitty ass driver being a bad thing long term for them, not Microsoft.

          • mindlight@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh… The home users matters to Microsoft. A lot.

            MS have been standing by the sidelines watching Google raking home all that sweet money made from all that personal data Android and Chrome users happily hand over.

            Why do you think you’re able to install Windows and use it without activating it? Because Microsoft are nice guys doing charity?

            No. Microsoft aren’t dropping the home market. They’ve just been repositioning themselves the last couple of years.1

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We’re 5 years into Proton, in another 5 years there won’t be a game that doesn’t run better on Linux.

        Insh’allah :D (* I’m an atheist, but the phrase is kind of fitting)

    • coolmule0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fully usable with NVidia. I can play all the games I want at the same graphical settings as Windows. (Nvidia 1080)

    • K0W4L5K1@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have a 1660 and every game ive played on linux does run better and getting the nvidia drivers wasnt that hard

  • Free Palestine 🇵🇸@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, that’s what happens when you don’t have crazy spyware services running in the background. Also Windows, just like any Microsoft product, is very inefficient and wastes lots of resources.

  • arc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    It must be very hard to exactly compare games between Windows and Linux because it’s possible that emulation in Proton, WINE or the driver means some settings or extensions might not be enabled even if they appear to be. DirectX emulation is also bound to slow things down so a game probably has to be use OpenGL or Vulkan directly.

    So while I can well believe that Linux can keep up and possibly exceed Windows, it needs a careful technical eye to ensure a true comparison is happening.

      • arc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Wine is an emulator. It might not have started as such when it was winelib but it is now, especially when running binaries. If in doubt read their own FAQ where they take pains to describe it depends what you’re doing and what is meant by emulation.

  • FrankLaskey@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is impressive and interesting, but what about hardware ray tracing support? Proton has been very impressive but I thought that RT on DX12 was basically non-existent on Linux.

    • deathmetal27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hardware raytracing works even on newer Radeon cards. I played Control recently with raytracing on Linux and it works pretty well, though the average frame rate drops to around 40 FPS. I had to use FSR to get higher framerates.

  • Gerula@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s also like saying that bloating an OS with spyware and useles eyecandy it makes it use hardware resources ineficiently. But of course that’s not the case with Micro$oft.

  • FrankLaskey@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    AMD only and not Nvidia? That’s what I was seeing based on a quick search. Unfortunately, I don’t have an AMD GPU.

    • yuriy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve got an RTX 2060 mobile that I’ve been linux-gaming on for a few years now, it’s been great. I was getting consistent blue screen crashes with windows, even after multiple reinstalls. Ubuntu had some minor issues out of the box, like I had to find a program to control screen brightness, but PopOS has been literally flawless.

      I’ve been saying for years now that gaming on linux feels faster. Most games get better framerates than they did natively on windows, but I’ve never known if that was unique to my setup. Really neat to have more data!

    • Arthur_Leywin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Too much effort for too little market share. But since the Steam Deck is popular, it’s harder to ignore Linux.

  • Destraight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Okay, so say I did switch to Linux. I would have to transfer all of my files that I have saved from Windows and try to make them compatible with being on Linux. It’s also very excruciating and mentally painful that I would just have to start from scratch. I like all the various things I have saved on my PC i would not want to lose them

    • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean transferring files isn’t so difficult. Linux supports NTFS so it’s as easy as opening the files in the file browser and moving them to your linux partition.

      But yes in my experience it does take a few months to transition and in that time I did move back to Windows a few times, but eventually I stuck with Linux since it had a lot more features and benefits over Windows

    • Pyro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can you be more specific?

      I may be reading this wrong, but it sounds like you think Linux requires all your files to be converted to some other format before you can use them. There is no such thing as a Windows-JPEG and a Linux-JPEG, it’s just a JPEG. All your files will still work. It’s the software that opens the files that might need to change (e.g. MS Word or Photoshop).

      Unless you’re talking about filesystems like NTFS and ext4, in which case there is no argument to be made as Linux supports NTFS already. In my experience, it “just works”.

    • Thetimefarm@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As long as you have your files backed up properly it shouldn’t be too difficult. If you don’t, I’d be more worried about what happens if one of your drives failed and how you’d retrieve that data.