• shrodes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Which other countries with stricter gun restrictions than the US regularly have school shootings?

    • CheeseToastie@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Yes, I agree publicised school shootings are generally in the US. Did any of the other countries go from firearms being lawful to unlawful over the last few decades? The US has a huge amount already there, and that’s a significant difference.

    • CheeseToastie@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I don’t feel countries can be compared like that. School shootings are often carried out by juveniles who can’t lawfully get a gun. They’re committing mass murder showing they’re not law abiding. Realistically there’s so many guns in America that even making guns illegal wouldn’t prevent guns in the country.

      Instead there’s other things that could help, such as training professionals to identify perpetrators and warning signs they’re going to attack. PSAs could be done so people can ID people around them.

      • notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        ^OP, here’s the answer to your question

        (Intellectual laziness and uncritical acceptance of propaganda).

        School shootings are often carried out by juveniles who can’t lawfully get a gun.

        Cut this crap, this isn’t reddit. Most kids them get the guns from a relative or friend who obtained it legally and adequate storage laws reduce both suicides and homicides in kids. BTW, guns kill more kids now than cancer or car accidents, but only in the US. Your take is the best example of americans being unconcerned about preventable deaths.

        • CheeseToastie@lazysoci.al
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Please let me reassure you, thats inaccurate. I do voluntary work in DA, work in the supportive sector and have personally funded related uni courses (DA being linked to crime perpetration, incels, firearm misuse etc). I’ve done considerable research into academic articles on lone actor grievance fuelled violence. I do far more than the average person does, I just have a different perspective… partly due to the academic research I’ve read.

          • notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Please let me reassure you, thats inaccurate…

            What’s inaccurate? I made like 5 statements.

            1. Guns kill more school-aged kids than motor vehicle accidents and cancer (i had to recreate the stats from the CDC wonder database myself excluding anybody over 18 because schmucks kept on complaining about the NEJM article including 19-year-olds, which apparently invalidated the data, except that it didn’t)

            2. Gun suicides are mostly committed using firearms from friends and relatives.

            3. If you look at UK’s homicide stats and the US’s (BJS) homicide stats you can tell that actually the homicide rate difference is driven by firearms.

            4. It’s a fact that it is much harder to kill someone including oneself without a gun.

            5. States that have gun storage laws have lower firearm mortality in kids.

            6. Blablabla on your trust me because I did some research. I’m in academia and published half a dozen (non-gun) epidemiology papers to date as a side hustle so I do know how to use the CDC databases. I’ve been forced to dive into the gun violence data because I’m really fed up with all the disinformation.

            7. What I have seen no supportive evidence for to date is “that training professionals to identify perpetrators” (“hardening schools?”) has any effect on school shootings.

            -

            Now let’s see your papers.

            • CheeseToastie@lazysoci.al
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              I’m referring to the personal remarks you made about me, they were inaccurate. Do you retract them?

      • silly goose meekah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Sure, the shootings won’t stop the day legislation changes. But it prevents more guns from entering the US, making it more difficult to get one, even illegally.

        I get that some people in the states need guns. Some communities have a real danger from bears etc. But those people can get a license to own a gun, the way it works in most countries.

        • CheeseToastie@lazysoci.al
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Yes hopefully it would. It’s a slow drawn out process though, and america isn’t an island. It’s not a fix

            • CheeseToastie@lazysoci.al
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Yep, given the reality of how many firearms there are already, and the resources it would take to remove them… I think we should focus on other things.

              • silly goose meekah@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Who says the government needs to remove them? There could be a grace period of a year or maybe several years, during which people already owning a gun can apply for a license and receive the necessary training. Those who don’t want to get the license can come in to prove they made the firearm unusable. Anyone else owing a gun can be made liable after that grace period. This would minimize necessary resources.

                Also, a proper government should be able to focus on several things. And I do think daily school shootings is something worth focusing on.

                • CheeseToastie@lazysoci.al
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  46 minutes ago

                  I agree that this is worth focusing on. Your suggestions would help. Sadly that doesn’t remove the firearms already in the US. Meaning that criminals can obtain them.