• Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    HOAs just like unions and governments are as good as the people that involve themselves in them and the less people represented in the democracy the more power you have in it so if you’re not happy then get involved.

    • CoderKat@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I kinda agree with you. In theory, they definitely are. But at the same time, in practice, the already bad reputation of HOAs seems to attract the worst kind of people. It’s a political position and suffers just like any other political position. The kinds of people who’d be best at it often don’t want to do it because it’s toxic.

  • Margot Robbie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    That reminds me, I used to think getting that haircut would make me look all cool and badass.

    I really don’t know what I was thinking.

  • uis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    While in USA Karens are relatively yong, in post-Soviet countries they are…

    A group of them called Grannys Near Entrance or Grannyguards

  • kamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    The word “homeowner” contains the word “meow” in it; now you can’t read “homeowner” in any other way.

  • makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    We don’t have them in Australia that I’m aware of, but they do sound atrocious. What happened to that land of the free?

    • thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re basically just groups that are supposed to help prevent one person tanking everyone’s property value by letting their home go to shit.

      The problem is that typically the only people who get involved in them are retired busy bodies who want to assert what little power they have. Good ones too exist, though.

      • CoderKat@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah. The idea of what is bad for properties values is extremely subjective and some people take it to such extremes as to not let there ever be something they don’t like.

        Eg, houses can only be painted a very select few shades. Lawns have to be trimmed short and even a short vacation could get you a fine. Cars can’t be parked on driveways overnight. You must have at least 3 flower beds of a minimum size. Trash bins can only be brought out in the morning and not the night before. Etc etc. Anything you can imagine a cranky neighborhood complaining about, some HOA probably has a rule for.

        There’s lots of common sense rules you could have. It’s easy to picture a stereotypical crack den that you wouldn’t want in your neighbourhood. But there’s also a lot of people whose idea of a good neighborhood is cookie cutter white suburbia with no personality. If you try to have anything else, they’ll fine you. If you try and fight the fines, you risk losing your house cause you can bet they’ll try to make you pay any legal fees and they can probably get a lien on your house.

      • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        …groups that are supposed to help prevent one person tanking everyone’s property value by…

        By being black. Or otherwise a minority.

        • thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, a redneck with a car on cinder blocks in their front yard will tank property values way more than a black person living in the neighborhood.

        • thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If a law isn’t enforced, then it’s not illegal. Most cities don’t have the budget to hire enough people to enforce the municipal code, which is where HOAs step in.

    • Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      My HOA only has rules for weeds and not blocking sidewalks with cars. I thought I was going to hate it, but honestly it keeps things nice. In my last neighborhood so many assholes would have boats and RVs literally parked on the sidewalk.

        • Franklin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Unenforced City ordinances in my experience. That being said I’ve never had a HOA so I can’t speak to their efficacy.

          I’d imagine it’s hand in hand with NIMBY’s which can just fuck right the hell off.

      • uis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not blocking sidewalks with cars? It’s just illegal here.

        And weeds kinda too, but only Sosnovsky Hogweed is enforced.

      • thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My dad lived in a great one. Had a community pool, event center, tennis court, and a well maintained park/playground.

        The only time my parents heard from the HOA was when they put a bench in the front yard, but that was just a letter saying, “Hey, the bench is cool, but please let us know beforehand next time.”

    • Pregnenolone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re basically stratas and body corporations in Australia, except the laws basically make them not as powerful as HOAs

    • Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      They are far from ubiquitous here. You’ll typically find HOAs in new housing developments.

      Most (single family) homes in the US leave the owner beholden only to governments. Some places are “unincorporated” and don’t even have a municipal government at all.

      HOAs exist to serve a specific subset of the population who want to own a single family home but lack the ability or willingness to do major maintenance.

      My best friend just bought an HOA home against my advice, but he’s terrified of doing anything with tools despite my offers to teach him. Of the dozen or so friends and family members I know who bought a home in the past decade he is the only one who was not actively repulsed by the idea of buying a home with an HOA.

      • ngdev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What? This is completely wrong. HOAs do not maintain your home for you, that’s wild that you think that’s the reason for HOAs. I live in an HOA and they don’t do anything besides make sure everyone’s house is presentable (like no missing fence pickets) and upkeep the HOA center + pool.

        • TyrionsNose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s for the opposite of what that person said. It’s for the people who also want their neighbors to maintain their property. Whether that’s through hiring contractors or doing it themselves.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Some places are “unincorporated” and don’t even have a municipal government at all.

        The way you phrased that sort of implies municipal-government things just don’t get done in unincorporated places, but that’s not the case. Instead, it’s just that the county government handles everything directly. And of course, everywhere in the US is part of a county. (Except Louisiana, I guess, where they’re called “parishes” instead. And maybe Native American reservations too, IDK?)

        HOAs exist to serve a specific subset of the population who want to own a single family home but lack the ability or willingness to do major maintenance.

        There are two major purposes of HOAs:

        1. To handle maintenance of shared or collectively-owned property, such as exteriors and common areas of condominium buildings, neighborhood swimming pools, private streets, etc.

        2. As the last tactic of segregation: once de-jure segregation was abolished (1917), property owners switched to using racist CC&Rs (deed restrictions) to keep out minorities. The first HOAs (at least for single-family house neighborhoods with little or no shared property) were created to enforce those restrictions. Even after those were ruled unenforceable (1948), HOAs remained popular as a means of creating ostensibly non-racist rules and then selectively enforcing them to harass non-white residents.


        And I hate to break it to some of the folks in this thread who think their HOA is innocuous and is just there to make sure everybody’s single-family house is presentable: if it isn’t reason #1, then it is reason #2. You were just too innocent to realize it.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Local governments encouraging them in order to shirk their responsibilities (e.g. they don’t have to maintain the street if it’s private), as @HubertManne mentioned, is also recently a thing.

            Still, those reasons are both very new, and thus don’t apply to the vast majority of HOAs.

      • The_Biggest_Cum@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I own a home in an unincorporated area that also has an HOA, but ours is only for 3 things:

        1. Yearly fire inspections (California)

        2. Negotiating with the local trash company for service cost

        3. Negotiating with the local propane company for lower cost

        My super anti-government neighbors are still working to dissolve it, but it doesn’t even have any rules that aren’t “see county laws and fire code”, they just don’t like the $50/year fee

        I’m aware my experience isn’t the norm, though

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        American crime writer, Karin Slaughter, threw a cute little Easter Egg into one of her books. One of the busybody residents in an upscale neighborhood is named Alison Hendrickson.

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Wow now we finally reached ‘karen’ replacing ‘nerd’ insults. I think at some point if you’re just complaining that someone else you don’t like keeps picking up the slack, unused reigns from the ground; the problem lies more with all the other people refusing to pick them up.

    Want to fix this? Vote Basically. Or run it yourself so a ‘karen’ doesn’t just take whatever. Problem isn’t the system if you think it’s supposed to just magically cater to you without any of your interest or input.