That’s a cute dress. If I pirate it, will I get a Creative Cloud warning pop up when it dials home?
Just update your host file so it can’t connect to adobe.com
I will wait until the gimp version is released
deleted by creator
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
This article desperately needs video.
Here’s the official video from Adobe. Bump to 45s into the vid to see the dress in action:
Thanks… Been seeing the article but didn’t even want to bother with reading about it.
The video is pretty damn cool though.
Is it gold or blue I can’t tell
Still no pockets though.
It’s like the dress Rorschach made his mask from in Watchmen.
For some reason I’m not super impressed with this. Looks too much like you’re wearing e-ink panels. Call me when these are fully functioning OLEDs that kinetically charge when you walk.
Each one of those scales operates as an independent display, and coordinating them is quite a challenge. I’d be interested in knowing what is driving them, because it’s surely not very portable.
Powerbank backpack lol I guess you could go pretty small with hardware in these ARM days comming
I’m sure orchestrating this isn’t super easy (however, if you treat every “display” as a “pixel”, Idk how this coding is different than a woman wearing a dress made of addressable LEDs— on the surface it doesn’t seem super complicated engineering), but it appears as unimpressive.
And you can totally just throw it in the washing machine, right?
Dry clean only of course
OMG she’s wearing the same dress she wore last week! She just changed the design!
Reminds me of the book The Diamond Age, where the clothes used nanotech to transform and become waterproof etc.
Or the dress that Rorschach made his mask from.
And why do you want this?
Or was this a “We can build it so we did”?
Because it’s awesome and also yes.
Hey look its the prototype for Metal Gear Solid.
Love this is what we spend our resources on while children go without food, water, electricity, education, and shelter.
Despite what the GOP would have you believe, The US and EU have actually achieved post-scarcity, China is close. You should be fighting for post-inequality because that is what is holding back the rest of the world, as well as millions of citizens of the US and EU.
Yes, we’re just passing a bunch of money around at the top.
It’s why I almost never take Americans seriously when they say they ‘need’ more money. They don’t know what that word means, or what hard work really is.
Oh really? Americans don’t ever need more money? How about these Americans? They’re doing fine on whatever they can panhandle from people leaving the Walmart parking lot and dumpster food?
Oh… and some of those people? Full-time employed.
Looks like they’re living in a major city.
Supply and demand.
They can leave and their money will go way further. The problem is, a lot of people living in major cities feel they’re entitled to do so.
I don’t live in a major city and we have the same thing here. So no.
I don’t believe you.
Ok, I guess that’s your right, I guess…
https://www.businessinsider.com/unhealthy-american-work-habits-2017-11
Sure. We don’t work hard. Talk to me when you have spent 25 years in American kitchens to fund your own businesses, the first 5 of which never took off, but also consistently failed to drive me into bankruptcy. The 6th one finally works for me, and I’m finally not having to work 18 hour days 7 days a week.
Yeah. That’s definitely working harder than most people have throughout history for less.
My bad.
the first 5 of which never took off, but also consistently failed to drive me into bankruptcy.
Lol, don’t blame your failed business ventures on me. If you think ‘hard work’ is all it takes to make a successful business, I’m sorry, that’s just a testament to why 5 of your businesses failed.
and I’m finally not having to work 18 hour days 7 days a week.
Let me guess, you’re also living a higher quality of life than the vast majority of people ever to live while working considerably less. And here you are, still finding ways to complain.
Please take your complaints to the people subsistence farming or picking through landfills for a living. All your post does is prove my point that you don’t understand what hard work really is, or what the word need really means.
The people who designed this were paid to design this. I presume that at least some of them have children. Therefore, resources spent to invent this did go to give children food, water, shelter, etc.
You’re welcome.
Yeah, they could’ve done something else useful for society and still support their families.
You’re welcome.
For what? Your mental gymnastics? Lol.
Lol.
Look at the authoritarian communist, dictating how other people must live their lives.
Let’s round up all the artists and musicians too, because they’re not feeding kids or something.
Oh but didn’t you hear? When we live on the commune we can all do like…arts and crafts and stuff…all day. And we don’t really know how, but stuff will get done while we fingerpaint and there will be no poverty or hunger!
Huh? Improve your literacy, and reread the word I wrote in front of communist.
improve your literacy
That comment was dripping with sarcasm, but you couldn’t comprehend it because it didn’t have an /s
Lol the irony
Lol your irony
deleted by creator
Oh look, a butthurt capitalist
Authoritarian capitalism isn’t much better, but fortunately, I included the word authoritarian.
Can you people stay on topic?
You mean, like how the original commenter did?
What do you mean? I was talking about how the dress is a waste of resources, then he started talking about artists and musicians.
You are not on topic, and now you’re crying because people are staying on your new topic.
HRRRRRR
You okay there?
Capitalists doing capitalist shit.
Of course they aren’t ok. They may think they are, but they are having to recognize that while the system may have worked for them, and me, it certainly doesn’t for most people and they can’t handle that.
My god, go back to lemmygrad.
My internet, please go back to Reddit where your capitalist takes will be supported.
Can it turn into the face of Nic Cage?
deleted by creator
