• moon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    129
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    For Lemmy just replace racism with unsolicited Linux advice

          • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Well, bought and paid for, may as well use em! Just because the .ml and hexbear folk are near clownish in their frothing evangelism, doesn’t mean they’re wrong about everything…

    • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’d rather have the unsolicited linux advice tbh

      but anyways that’s not super relevant because there very much is still racism on lemmy…

    • Cat@ponder.cat
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I get what you are saying, but you should try Chimera Linux.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      We are racists when it comes to operating systems. No windows allowed at home.

      Maybe we need a term for this. What do the gender focused Lemmy crowd think is a good term for not accepting windows.

      Windophobic?

      • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Are the rumours about Arch being too hard true? If someone’s experienced with Debian and Fedora, will they find Arch too hard?

        • ugo@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Ime, not really. It feels daunting the first time, but the installation guide on the wiki is actually really good at holding your hand through it.

          Just be careful not to skip any sections

          • Pope-King Joe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Plus now there’s an installation script that is really good for basic installs. Takes about 10 minutes now.

        • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s not really difficult but as far as i remember, you have to configure everything yourself, which can be tiring. Depends on your mood though, if you’re into configuring your own linux system, then i guess Arch is perfect for you.

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I think vanilla Arch is daunting to get going because it drops you in with so little to start with. Once you’re past that I think it’s fine. Especially if you’re already used to Debian and Fedora. Sure, you’ll need to learn to use pacman (Arch’s package manager) and it is a little confusing at times, but there’s a ton of great advice for it online, including the Arch wiki.

          I highly suggest EndeavourOS. It’s basically Arch with a better install process. Once its done you’ll have a desktop environment and browser. I’m using CachyOS which is similar but has a little but more stuff, but it’s still Arch. Like you, I’m very confident with other Linux OSes but was wary of Arch. Turns out people have good solutions to get over that worst hurdle nowadays (the original install and getting a desktop environment).

          Also, unlike other derivative distributions like Ubuntu to Debian and Manjaro to Arch, EndeavourOS really is just Arch. It’s just a nicer install process.