$25 to rent the movie, one watch within max 24 hours after you start watching it… Or $5 more to own it. Scammers.

  • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    143
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No you are mistaken with “Or $5 mire to own it”. You own a license to watch for the amount of time the platforms decides to keep it up.

  • atomWood@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Spending $30 to own a brand new movie that just came out is not something I have a problem with.

    However, not being able to download a copy of the movie you purchased is where I take issue.

    • Zach@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      $30 to own the movie is valid, but for $5 less, you’re only allowed 1 watch within 24 hours of starting. Something like that shouldn’t be basically the same price as the movie. With pricing like this, they basically force you to spend the extra $5. There isn’t even a point to rent the movie and they know that.

      • atomWood@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I absolutely agree! Renting a movie should cost nowhere near as much as purchasing the movie.

  • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 year ago

    I kind of get the feeling that CEOs and corporations see the writing on the wall in terms of the world, economy, and climate change. We’re headed for some really extreme times in history and I think these guys have the mindset to just go full balls and try to scam as much wealth out of humanity as possible before the shit hits the fan. The greed I see from companies these days is very blatant and in your face, they don’t try to hide it anymore, it’s all very “fuck you, pay me” and it’s virtually every company you can find these days, they’re all doing everything they can to fuck everyone out of one more penny.

    • kembik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Movies have been very expensive in the short term period after theatrical release, that’s why blockbuster would charge $60 if you lost the tape, it’s how much they sold to rental stores for before wide release. This higher price is absurd to me but to the studios it’s a premium for all the hype they built up, the price will come down after a few months. They are still working out the new models and testing the waters to see what floats.

  • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 year ago

    After the first few times I had apple remove a book from my library, and the only explanation they ever gave me was “sometimes books change, and when books change they are a new book,” I just went back to DRM free. If I have to jump through hoops, and still can’t keep the content I legally purchased, why would I legally purchase the content?

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s $25 for a revocable license to watch it once and $5 more for a revocable license to watch it as many times as you want until the service folds or they decide to memory-hole it in order to get out of paying residuals to the cast and crew. The only way to own something is to steal it.

      • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s weird how people were told it’s theft and they simply repeated it forever despite knowing exactly what theft is and knowing piracy is literally not the same thing.

        • the_stormcrow@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Now apply this same reasoning to other life concepts we’ve been told, and welcome to enlightenment.

          (Or black pilling, YMMV)

          • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You need to get yawnpilled. Check it out: some of the things people commonly accept as true actually are true. Up your grind and get on my level

        • Zoolander@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not the same thing but that doesn’t mean it’s not theft, nonetheless.

              • Zoolander@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Way to be dishonest. Comments do not make for people’s livelihoods. Piracy is theft of income from the creators. People here are dishonest and try to do all these mental gymnastics to justify their specific version of piracy. The only form of piracy that can be argued to be somewhat amoral is pirating media that is not available legally. Otherwise, no matter how you look at it, you are stealing an income or livelihood from whoever created it.

                • antipiratgruppen@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Please understand that copying intellectual property and theft are, legally speaking, two different things. If I build a machine that just makes endless copies of your intellectual property, just because I can, it doesn’t affect your income whatsoever. You don’t get more poor for each copy that’s made.

                  I agree with you about pirating media that’s not legally available. However, a lot of great content will become unavailable at some point in the future. Making a copy for the archives while it’s possible is a good idea for any media you care about, since there’s no guarantee that anyone else cares.

  • RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    And buying the movie probably won’t give you a file, but instead just the right to stream it from their servers. At some point they’ll pull the plug on that and you’ll loose access.

  • ximtor@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I am just baffled by how many people pay idiotic prices with “life just got more expensive, what are you gonna do”

    If people happily keep buying all the overpriced shit it’s just gonna get worse…

      • Frays6142@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah it’s pretty great how the “cost” of things go up but the folks involved in the actual production of said goods are not getting paid more, makes one wonder…

  • GeoGio7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I pirated Barbie and was pretty excited to see it but damn I was disappointed, this movie was seriously overhyped it’s really nothing to write home about.

      • GeoGio7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        To me it just seemed perfectly serviceable. It wasn’t a bad movie but I just wasn’t blown away at all. I was expecting some kind of deep nuanced take on gender roles and heart strings being tugged. But it was all kind of silly and unsurprisingly(since Mattel paid for the movie) felt like Mattel jerking themselves off. It was just very very silly and cheesy but not endearing enough for it to work I felt.

    • rooster_butt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t know why, but from the hype I expected it to be a bit more mature, but it had the plot depth of a kids movie… Well it was a kids movie that’s why it just felt flat to me.

    • nostradiel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Honestly if it was a freaking masterpiece there is no way in hell that I’d watch a Barbie movie…

  • girl@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the first movie I ever pirated, specifically because of this bullshit pricing. Now I have a VPN and a 500 GB server, which I’m sure will need to be upgraded at some point lol

    • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      a 500 GB server,

      I remember those days…about 20 years ago haha I finally dismantled my 189 TB server about 3 months ago because I’m moving 1,300 miles away. I have 50 TB in the cloud now. Space goes quick, especially these days with 1080p with HDR and 4K with Dolby Atmos and Vision. I think my biggest single file is about 125 GB. Many of them are 50-80 GB a piece.

      edit: fixed

      • veng@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I find the best way if you’re on a budget is to have a small collection of 4k movies, with an even smaller rotation of new 4k movies - then have everything else at 1080p x265. Still want at least 8TB ideally, so down the NAS rabbit hole we go…

        • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you’re low on storage IDK if 4K is even worth it, maybe low-end (compressed audio, HDR10) 4K. Once you go 4K all the way, it gobbles up space quickly. I had like 250 4K movies and it was about 10-15 TB (rough estimation, this was months ago)

          • veng@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think it depends on your setup - if you’ve got a good 4k HDR TV then by all means you could just watch then delete and it would be worth it. But yeah good point, may as well do 1080 otherwise, if you want a collection. I’ve only got 90 movies at 1080p and struggle to justify keeping more than that.

        • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s object storage, so actually not as much as you’d think. I think it was like $500 for a year, the price increases 4 fold after that if you don’t upgrade to a higher tier

    • smackjack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      There used to be a video store near me that had a 444 deal. You could rent four movies for four days for four dollars.

      • GreenBottles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        in the USA for the longest time there was a chain of video stores by me called family video that you could rent seven movies for 7 days for 50 cent each

        • PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Both of these deals strictly applied to older titles without a “new release” sticker, meaning they are not applicable in this context.