Classic mod.

The people downvoting you better be as consistent when it comes to Australias tobacco packaging.

Did you know it would have been impossible for Denethor to run the distance across the courtyard of Minas Tirith while on fire?

Username does not check out.

No, it isn’t. Hunter is being charged with lying about drug use on a gun form. This would be Trump buying a gun with active indictments against him.

We can continue the music analogy again, if you’d like.

Which domains are least likely to ban you for equivalating using statistics to cull animals to eugenics and trepanning?

I think .world is slowly transitioning towards reddit.shitty. in how heavy handed the moderation is. Interesting that comments advocatin for the literal murder of cops is allowed but saying “13 % of dogs commit 90% of crime” is a bannable offense.

Which domains have the least arbitrary moderation tools?

Also: Cops are generally pigs.

Or: To put things on topic. .World has made relatively unilateral decisions regarding the health of the domain. Which domains have a more democratic regard for what is and isn’t appropriate? If lemmy is going to be a more poorly paid Reddit, I’d rather go to the place with more than 1 new commented-on post per hour.

They use carbrains as an insult. They expect people to add an hour to any commute.

Uh, music is content. Some music has more heart than others, but I wouldn’t say that Target is disgusting because they sell cheap prints and wall art.

People get mad that Steam shows them games. It’s like loading up Netflix, seeing the list of movies, and yelling “look at all of these ads”!

I just think we should be consistant. If we’re using statistics to cull creatures, racists are going to have a field day.

Hey look, someone with a shitty troll username making shitty troll comments.

Would Chinese people tell you they hate their government? Is Chinese authoritarianism a good thing just because the people within China don’t complain?

I could show you a study showing that black people commit every single crime on earth and it wouldn’t make disceiminating against them any less racist.

Ummm excuse me I have never felt threatened by a man, so why are women complaining?

Also, are you going to use 13/90 as an excuse to be racist too?

Kinda telling this was your first comment when it’s about women’s white’s safety and the rising number of abuses women whites have faced as passengers from the men blacks driving.

Guaifenisin seems to clear my chest congestion up pretty quickly. If I’m placeboing myself, then lalalala I’m not listening.

I have no doubt it’s regional as hell. In my experience, though, no one is going to skimp on soda. Generally, it’ll be the first thing I’d give for free if it seemed reasonable.

Big world out there, though.

Mostly because the world disregards their concerns. “I was able to go through school with lead paint and leaded gasoline” says the fucking boomer.

“I was able to go to school withoit a cellphone.”

Good job, you survived a time when life was much simpler, and I’m glad you’ll use your experience to shit on the next generation. It’s the same argument against LLMs. They aren’t going away and saying. “No, don’t” isn’t going to change the world.

It’s the same stupid worldview that thinks playing a “gambling is dangerous” warning after a Draft King ad is an effective deterrent.

That’s the policy in the OP. I’m not sure if it says it in the article, but the OP commented that it includes between class.