https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_of_a_set?wprov=sfla1
The sets in [partition] P are called the blocks, parts, or cells, of the partition.
The number of cells in partition is >= 1.
While Reagan is the instrument that set America the path to hell, Bill Clinton was the right hand who crushed any idea of a rebound by labor. One can only assume both Clintons were critical in selling the DNC to capital.
You need good quality metal to make precise clockwork. You need to be able to make those metals.
This comment isn’t wrong. Putin is evil but you trust him to be that. the usa is extremely bipolar swinging wildly in mood. Some of that being manipulated by putin, only adding to the lack of internal stability.
Yes it does, i think there is a tos episode that hints at that as well
Laws clearly work, everywhere with strong gun control has nearly no mass shootings.
At what point do they take assets?
What are you using that makes it crash, virtually never happens to me.
I see Special Agent Bill Patterson, bc [Grotesque]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grotesque_(The_X-Files)?wprov=sfla1) is a fantastic episode.
This is amazing; I’m dying over here.
Cars that have never had a style update. Now that they exist in meaningful numbers they look old and tired.
If getting people back into work makes your property more valuable that the productive losses, it’s not a sunk cost. The leaders might be doing their math wrong, but they are not necessarily making a sunk cost fallacy here.
However, i do agree it’s likely a choice driven by power and personalities, not money. I suspect a lot of talk about how remote workers can be abused and controlled has happened.
They don’t have leases. They own that real estate. So its value is a considerable line item in the company’s value. If they get people in office, it’s a boost to the company’s value. The property is hit yet sunk in their eyes.
Oh, so good news, the blood fugue is close to an end. I was worried this would get worse. /s
Internet should be a public utility and owned by the local government.
But keeping supply low is more profitable. There isnt going to be an expansion of housing without a change in the rules of the game.
A bad quarter isn’t what this is about. It’s about the idea that constant percentage growth is good or realistic. Any stock with flat growth over a decade will not be a good long-term investment. Your comment proves the point here.
I just looked at various bookings on AA, and the price change for the same flights booked differently is wild, over 100% change.
Those lifetime appointments to the supreme court are really protecting that institution. /s
The issue is much deeper than elections.