• 0 Posts
  • 18 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 4th, 2023

help-circle


  • "The Open Book is my long-standing attempt to design a comprehensible and accessible e-book reader that you can build yourself (or at least have manufactured affordably). The current edition is something I’m calling the “Abridged” or “Developer Preview” edition. It’s designed to be incredibly simple: there are 7 through-hole and 14 surface mount components, nearly all in a chunky 1206 package that’s easy to hand solder. The tradeoff is that it has no LiPo charging circuit; instead it uses AAA batteries, making it a bit more chunky than previous versions of the book.

    The goal with this version is to get hardware in hands so we can start hacking on firmware."

    https://www.oddlyspecificobjects.com/projects/openbook/

    So:

    • This is a hobby / project of love
    • The current focus is on hardware

    I’m sure that the eventual plan is to support ePub.

    I’m not sure it will ever get there, because it’s not a well resourced project, but I personally don’t like criticizing one person’s efforts, which they are making freely available.





  • Jordan_U@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlTrolley Problem Solution
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    A concrete example of this is doctors and hospitals creating guidelines about how to triage care when ICUs were/are full because of unmitigated spread of COVID.

    It is definitely an “interesting” phylisophical question to ask:

    “If a long term ventilator user comes into the ICU, with the ventilator they own and brought from home, and they are less likely to survive than an otherwise healthy young man who needs a respirator due to COVID infection, is the morally best choice to steal the disabled person’s ventilator (killing them) and use it to save the young man’s life?”

    The policy question that should be asked instead, and never really ways, is “How do we make sure that we never get to the point where we have so many people in the ICU from a preventable disease that we run out of respirators and need to start choosing who to let die?”

    This is not just a hypothetical question:

    https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/long-term-ventilator-users-lose-bid-revive-suit-over-ny-emergency-guidelines-2022-11-23/

    Disabled people continue to plead with us for the bare minimum, like requiring doctors who work with immunocompromised patients to wear N95 respirators while treating those patients.

    We continue to chose to stack more people on both sets of tracks instead.






  • If you can take multiple large, failed, risks without ending up on the street then you have immense privilege.

    It’s hard for most people to “learn from their failures” and keep taking “big” risks, unless the risk to their own life circumstances was never actually that “big”.



  • Jordan_U@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlSociety
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hot take:

    With genocide and eugenics on the rise again in the real world, maybe we shouldn’t be celebrating a movie whose entire premise is eugenics.

    “Here’s what horrible things could happen if we continue to let the wrong people breed while the right kind of people breed to little!”





  • Almost never. When I do, it’s probably most often because I’m thinking about concrete.

    I have never felt less like a “man” (in terms of gender) than when I watched a bunch of videos of men explaining why they think about the Roman empire every day.

    Actual quote, which was representative of the videos I saw:

    “What you need to understand about men, is that we all feel the urge to conquer.”

    — Well, I guess I’m not a man then 🤷.