• mydude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    43
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’d say US imperialism is many magnitudes worse than any other governments, except for the brutality of Israel. Who else has more than 750 bases in at least 80 countries worldwide and spends more on its military than the next 10 countries combined. But sure Russia, Iran, China, North-Korea, Venezuela bad.

    • el_bhm@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      I’d say US imperialism is many magnitudes worse than any other governments, except for the brutality of Israel

      Read a fucking history book at least once. The only country that makes the top 5 is russia by the sheer scale of terrain it held at one point and age.

      Not even sure if US imperialism makes it to the top 5. With all its capitalism, systematic racism, history of camps, military might across the globe. Barely top 5.

      Read. A. History. Book.

      Israel? Fucking peanuts with its genocide of Palestine. PEANUTS!

    • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s funny, but not surprising how much you’re down voted here. The meme is heavily upvoted for equating (presumably US) imperialism and (presumably Chinese) authoritarianism. But give an example of how much worse the US is, and people who pretend to hate imperialism fall over themselves to defend the US.

      • guy@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think the point is that both are bad. But somehow it always ends up with a competition where the US is more bad than the rest, and the rest is therefore somehow excused when .ml is involved

        • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Just like how both the Democratic party and the Republican party are bad, but somewhere here it always ends up with competition where the Republicans are worse, the rest is somehow excused when .world is involved.

        • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          “Both are bad” is not a serious geopolitical thought. Every real project will have negative aspects, so if you reduce your analysis to declaring something bad for having bad aspects you will never be able to discriminate between, say, the Nazis and the partisans who fought them and liberated their countries and concentration camps.

          Or, in this case, being unable to discriminate between the global seat of capital behind basically every single war and an ongoing genocide and a growing power who hasn’t had a war in decades and works to get countries out of IMF debt traps. You prevent yourself and others from seriously contending with how the world works and what place you can have in it.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          It’s important to recognize that when you equate two countries, you tacitly support the dominant narrative. Saying “ABC Bad and XYZ Bad” without doing work to contextualize the extent, impact, and level of “Badness” serves to exaggerate the evils of the “less bad” and understate the evils of the “more bad.” Condemning equally is therefore an unequal condemnation for unequal evils.

    • nl4real@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Who else has more than 750 bases in at least 80 countries worldwide and spends more on its military than the next 10 countries combined.

      And yet Russia still managed to launch a war with casualties on par with Iraq. Sorry sunshine, if you’re a global power, you’ve got a body count in the millions. Period.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        20 hours ago

        if you’re a global power, you’ve got a body count in the millions.

        Very true. But is this an inherent trait of the world, or is there some path forward that would change or mitigate this fact?

    • Shacktastic@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Shoot… US imperialism is soft-serve ice cream compared to the empires of history. Those military bases by and large extend the American security umbrella to protect the host country, not to put its population to the colonial boot and extract wealth. Yeah they sort of have to tow the line on US foreign policy, but it’s a far cry from, say, the Boer enslaving natives in South Africa or Alexander the great wiping out populations who defied him.

      The US has a long laundry list of dirty deeds, but overall the US “empire” has led to the longest and wealthiest period of global peace and scientific/technical/social advancement in the history of humankind. That doesn’t excuse anything but neither is it particularly useful to condition our allegiances on utopian absolutes of moral purities. When we do, evil wins (e.g., see recent election where 10M Democratic voters stayed home).

      • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Shoot… US imperialism is soft-serve ice cream compared to the empires of history.

        Amartya Sen estimated that Indian capitalism killed around 4 million people per year as compared to China’s more planned economy. Indian capitalism was maintained by the British and the US as part of “decolonization” and the superprofits reaped from India and ending up in the US are basically public record.

        This is a larger total number than basically any older empire you can think of.

        Those military bases by and large extend the American security umbrella to protect the host country, not to put its population to the colonial boot and extract wealth.

        Oh sweet summer child. Those are forward bases for US imperialism. They have been used to stage and supply every oppressive US war and to control shipping routes. They don’t all just sit there doing nothing. How much did Vietnam enjoy the “security umbrella” of US bases, again?

        This is just plain dishonest imperislist propaganda.

        Yeah they sort of have to tow the line on US foreign policy

        US bases are a symptom of already being beholden to the US. The people of Okinawa hate the US base there. It is only there because Japsn was conquered in WWII and surrendered to the US, and the US built it into a satellite for harassing Korea, China, and the USSR.

        but it’s a far cry from, say, the Boer enslaving natives in South Africa or Alexander the great wiping out populations who defied him.

        US imperialism is carrying out a genocide in Gaza right now via their ethnic supremacist proxy and just toppled the Syrian state, which will likely go the way of Libya if it doesn’t balkanize first. The US supports its ckient states that engage in slavery, such as the Saudis or Qatat, where South Asian laborers are brought in and their passports stolen.

        The US supported apartheid South Africa in a way that is very similar yo how it supports Israel.

        The US has a long laundry list of dirty deeds, but overall the US “empire” has led to the longest and wealthiest period of global peace and scientific/technical/social advancement in the history of humankind.

        Where is this period of global peace? The US is engaged in constant war. Where is this wealth? If you exclude socialist blocs the trends on poverty reverse. Scientific advancement was global and much of what you could list will have Soviet or Chinese workers behind it.

        That doesn’t excuse anything but neither is it particularly useful to condition our allegiances on utopian absolutes of moral purities. When we do, evil wins (e.g., see recent election where 10M Democratic voters stayed home).

        “If we don’t accept evil, evil wins” just listen to yourself, it doesn’t even make sense in this simplistic form.

        And who are “we”? Your statements place you squarely against those who suffer under global capitalism, dismissive of ongoing genocide. You’re basically doing the Stephen Pinker thing, and he is full of shit in addition to being buddy buddy with Epstein.

        • Shacktastic@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Yes., absolutely. The post-WW2 world order was led and architectured by the US. Think of the Marshal plan, Breton Woods, NATO, the UN, the space race and cold war, and the huge impact of the US Navy providing global security for oceanic trade.

      • recreationalcatheter@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’d say…

        Facts gets downvotes here!

        Do you know how opinions are different from facts?

        Such a sad excuse for an intellect.

      • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Fools get downvotes here. When the US launches a violent offensive directly on a neighboring independent country with the intent of destroying its people and conquering its land, which NK and Russia are currently trying to do, maybe you’ll have a point.

        Let’s just summarize the argument made here using actual facts:

        Everyone says Russia is so bad for bombing children’s hospitals and rest homes and apartment buildings, but look at the US’s military budget!"

        It’s pathetic.

        • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Fools get downvotes here. When the US launches a violent offensive directly on a neighboring independent country with the intent of destroying its people and conquering its land, which NK and Russia are currently trying to do, maybe you’ll have a point.

          “Neighbor” is doing all of the work here, as the US had pushed its frontiers far away from itself for about a century. Of course the US has actually invaded:

          • Canada
          • Mexico
          • Cuba
          • Guatemala
          • Puerto Rico
          • Haiti
          • Hawaii
          • Grenada

          [More but I don’t feel like compiling the full list]

          And some of those in the last half century or so!

          Of course, if you remove the morally meaningless qualifier of “neighbor”, your point goes entirely out the window. I think this is obvious to everyone, including you, so really the question is why the need to lie to yourself about US imperialism? Why downplay it in bad faith?

          • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            Ignores the point of my comment

            Hyperfocuses on one tiny detail

            .ml username

            What a shock.

            “Neighbor” was never an important detail, and only someone struggling to string together some type of deflection from the point would focus so deeply on it. The point, as is abundantly clear to anyone with a couple of braincells to rub together, is that these countries are doing that now, as in at this moment, and are targeting civilians, which the person in responding to gladly ignored with their “but no, everyone says Russia is bad” bullshit.

            And you have the gall to accuse me of making a bad faith argument. Once again, pathetic.

            • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              “Neighbor” was never an important detail, and only someone struggling to string together some type of deflection from the point would focus so deeply on it.

              Neighbor is the only qualifier that makes your claim arguably true for, say, 30-40 years. You included it yourself, I didn’t make you so it. If you get rid of the term “neigbor”, you are simply wrong.

              Instead of running away from it and trying to blame me for noticing, you could just acceot where I am correct and try to synthesize.

              You will get into conflicts and be consistently wrong if this is how you respond to correction.

              The point, as is abundantly clear to anyone with a couple of braincells to rub together, is that these countries are doing that now, as in at this moment, and are targeting civilians, which the person in responding to gladly ignored with their “but no, everyone says Russia is bad” bullshit.

              That applies to several countries, including US-backed Israel and the US-backed reactionaries in Syria, which is why the term “neighbor” does so much work. And in providing that obfuscatory defense, you are doing the thing you claim others are doing, which is excusing and minimizing war and death on civilians.

              And you have the gall to accuse me of making a bad faith argument. Once again, pathetic.

              It requires very little gall. You are putting on quite the display at the moment with the flurry of insults and deflections.

        • zeca@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          your conditions are too specific. what the US did to Iraq, Vietnam, Korea,… is already bad enough. But these dont qualify because they arent neighbors of the us, and the intentions arent exactly what you listed. still, these are already bad enough.

          • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 day ago

            I absolutely love the part where you guys are all so vocal about “but the US did this and this” but have literally nothing to say about @[email protected] up there acting like Russia and North Korea are perfect little saints while actively trying to wipe out civilians.

            Just Tankie Things™️

            • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              So you have no defense for your selective defense of US imperialism and lash out at others when it is noted.

              Anarchist instance btw

              • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                8 hours ago

                Selectively defends by accusing others of selective defence when they accuse you of selective defence

                Fucking lmao

                Anarchist instance

                DOUBLE LMAO

                Acting like Putin and Kim are chill is about as “anarchist” as Elon Musk thinks he is.

                • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  Notice that rather than address the absurdity if an “anarchist” ahistorically defending US imperialism, you’ve decided to make things up on my behalf.

                  Kill the Redditor in your brain.

                  • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    7 hours ago

                    I love the part where you, once again, describe yourself there while continuing to tiptoe around the matter at hand.

                    Just come out and say it, already. “I don’t have a problem with imperialism, just the wrong imperialism.”

                    Kill the 🤡 in your brain.

                    And FWIW, I am incredibly tired of this BS, so I’m blocking you because I’m tired of you flooding my replies.

            • zeca@lemmy.eco.br
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              dont blame me for the opinions of someone else. Just note how hipocritical you sound by dismissing criticism of the us while criticizing russia. Why not both?

            • Binette@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              I don’t know much about Russia or north Korea’s history, but I will not stand for the whitewashing of US crimes. It’s an insult their indigenous people, Vietnam and the middle east to suggest that the US had no implications in imperial projects.

              jUsT tAnKiE tHiNgS go fuck yourself

              • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                1 day ago

                Nice try putting words in my mouth, fuckhead. Things like Vietnam weren’t even being discussed until the tankies in this thread tried to use them as a tool to deflect from ongoing atrocities. But hey, if you’re down with bombing children’s hospitals and apartments, you do you I guess. But maybe you should try learning to fucking read before picking a side and accusing people, dipshit.

                • Binette@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  When the US launches a violent offensive directly on a neighboring independent country with the intent of destroying its people and conquering its land, which NK and Russia are currently trying to do, maybe you’ll have a point.

                  Then wtf does that mean? Also if you think the US is above bombing children, civilians and hospitals, you must have been living under a rock.

                  Aren’t you the one going around calling people tankies? If it makes you feel any better, I don’t like Russia or Putin.

        • TurboHarbinger@feddit.cl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          Of course the US citizens won’t agree with this, so their government has to do it somewhere else, so the US could wash their hands. Funnily enough, last time someone did this, a CEO was murdered to get accountability.

          This kind of crap is another level of hypocrisy.

          • ManixT@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Russia and Iran are the only reasons Assad remained in power, where he gassed his own citizens with chemical weapons and tortured, murdered, and jailed political opponents or anyone suspected being as much.

            It seems to be a recurring theme with your shit countries. Threatening the world with nukes, instating the world’s worst and most oppressive dictatorships, arming African warlords to exploit gold mines to prop up your shitty nazi landgrab war, building bases on land that doesn’t belong to you and you weren’t invited too, and the list goes on and on.