• Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    2 days ago

    And they would respond “You are excused, with our thanks”.

    Don’t get creative. The only correct answer is “no”.

    • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I had half a day to think about it when they were selecting jury for a DUI case. I’d rather speak my mind freely for the jurors they’ve already selected, who are present during the full selection process. Normally one might think context doesn’t matter but DUI laws can also apply to a bicycle, which is a perfect candidate for being nullified by the jury.

        • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah but I also didn’t really want to be on the jury that much. And I didn’t get called up anyway.

            • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              My approach also plants the seed of reason in the jurors who have already been selected. They may ignore jury nullification, but an open discussion of whether or not just laws need to be enforced never hurts.