WASHINGTON, Nov 17 (Reuters) - President Joe Biden’s administration will allow Ukraine to use U.S.-provided weapons to strike deep into Russian territory, three sources familiar with the matter said, in a significant change to Washington’s policy in the Ukraine-Russia conflict.

Ukraine plans to conduct its first long-range attacks in the coming days, the sources said, without revealing details due to operational security concerns.

The move by the United States two months before President-elect Donald Trump takes office on Jan. 20 follows months of requests by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to allow Ukraine’s military to use U.S. weapons to hit Russian military targets far from its border.

The change follows Russia’s deployment of North Korean ground troops to supplement its own forces, a development that has caused alarm in Washington and Kyiv.

The first deep strikes are likely to be carried out using ATACMS rockets, which have a range of up to 190 miles (306 km), according to the sources.

  • badelf@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    26 days ago

    It’s only for four months. Putin doesn’t mind how many Russians will die until Trump gets in and tells Ukraine to surrender his buddy.

    • LukácsFan1917@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      If Putin doesn’t care how many Ukrainians die, why is he even averse to hitting their rail lines and electrical infrastructure? They clearly save these attacks for retaliation when negotiations fall through yet again and the bellicose US statements get out of hand yet again.

      The whole mystification of Iran and Russia’s clear strategy of “fuck off so we can stabilize and develop” that inevitably results in risks to our own stability is too funny. Western orientalism is strong in 2024 as it was in 2001.

      Russia doesn’t benefit from destabilized hostile states on its border. What about that is so hard for liberals to understand? Putin and the oligarchs literally wanted to loot their country and sell shit to the west and you idiots have driven them to China. I should thank you, but you didn’t have any say in the matter.

      • shapesandstuff@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        Just wanna point out that in this initial reply to the comment tree, you did the exact same thing I just called you out on:
        Misrepresenting (or to not assume malice, misREADING) another comment to then spin your entire narrative around that error.
        They said:

        Putin doesn’t mind how many Russians will die

        You base your retort on:

        If Putin doesn’t care how many Ukrainians die

        “this already shows you are terrible at reading. How am I supposed to expect you to treat anything else I show you seriously when you cannot even read your own material?”

        • LukácsFan1917@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          You cannot be serious, this is a distinction without a difference. I can’t believe you’ve managed to find a way to fence sit between your own position and mine. Yes, to add to your inability to read, you seemingly intend to exhaust my energy by arguing about meaningless nonsense. You have the attitude of someone who does not value their time.

      • badelf@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        You’re ignoring the “USSR” - acquiring neighbor states to loot also. What if Ukraine and Chechen, etc, want to be left on their own?

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      25 days ago

      What is the point of drafted Ukrainians dying for the next four months? You already accept Ukraine will inevitably surrender.

      • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        25 days ago

        Ukraine has no ability to produce long range missiles whatsoever. These are all American missiles operated by American personnel. The Ukrainians can’t even launch them, never mind build them. And since it takes American personnel to launch them, it would mean the US is literally directly attacking Russia, at which point this in no way can be considered a “proxy” or “cold” war anymore, but a hot war between the two largest nuclear powers.

          • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 days ago

            The best source you have for these long range missiles is some Mickey Mouse Ukrainian propaganda outlet? Most of Ukraine’s industrial capacity was in eastern Ukraine, which western Ukraine has lost access to. This sounds like some Ghost of Kyiv-level Wunderwaffe.

            Also it has never been considered a proxy war. It’s literal Russian propaganda punch line, my dude. Find better sources than RT

            It has always been considered a proxy war, to weaken and ideally regime change or even Balkanize Russia[1][2]. The US government and corporate media aren’t going to tell you that, though[1]. Russia calling it a proxy war is not proof that it is not one. Find better sources yourself.

            • hitwright@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              24 days ago

              Did the CIA used mind control for the Russians to invade? Hard to see how the US could have started the proxy war.