• Czeron
      link
      fedilink
      English
      241 year ago

      I just bought 16 TB to expand my media server :)

    • Yurgenst
      link
      fedilink
      English
      171 year ago

      I have a feeling part of their plan is to sink all the pirate ships.

        • rustydomino
          link
          fedilink
          English
          131 year ago

          If watching One Piece has taught me anything, it’s that if you try and kill a pirate all that happens is you make better pirates.

      • Bobby Turkalino
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        Nintendo has been putting anti-piracy protection in all of their consoles since the NES in the 80’s. Every single one was cracked eventually. Oh, but surely they must be getting better? Nope, the Switch was cracked less than a year from release.

        And Nintendo controls the hardware in this situation. Streaming services do not.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      Yo-ho, all together, hoist the colors high. Heave ho, thieves and beggars, never shall we die!

    • Colonel Sanders
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      Yar har, fiddle de dee Being a pirate is alright to be Do what you want 'cause a pirate is free You are a pirate!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    streamers are currently being forced to reckon with their profitability — or lack thereof.

    Netflix’s 2023 2nd quarter revenue: 8.1 billion dollars BTW

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      451 year ago

      Brace yourself for a tidal wave of corporate apologists rushing to point out that “revenue isn’t profit!,!”

          • Billiam
            link
            fedilink
            English
            131 year ago

            What’s that? You want to share your four-screens-at-a-time account with three other people outside your house?

            Fuck you, pay us more.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        Anybody can look these numbers up. I’m not sitting on some secret Bloomberg terminal LOL

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -11 year ago

        …but it’s not. And I really think people either don’t understand that or they are intentionally misrepresenting the situation.

        Being level-headed and fact-driven isn’t “corporate apologist”, it’s how you maintain integrity and don’t derail your own movement by being dishonest about shit that doesn’t even matter.

        It’s like when Trump lies about his golf games. No one cares about his golf games but it makes you realize that if he’s willing to blatantly and badly lie about something so trivial, he’s probably also lying about absolutely everything else about him that might even remotely appear negative.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Plenty of people understand it, and some of them understand that profit is so malleable that it’s not really a useful measure of a company’s financial health. What really matters is how much they make over their essential production operational expenses. They can tailor their non essential expenses to seem as profitable or unprofitable as they want and use stock valuation tricks like buybacks to make money for shareholders regardless.

          What does it matter if the company is profitable or unprofitable on paper when certain people can make lots of money off it either way? Twitter was “unprofitable” it’s entire life but somehow I bet the executives still got their bonuses, I doubt the shareholders were dissatisfied with their stock valuations or the buybacks, and it sure didn’t stop them from acquiring other companies.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Thank you for putting this more eloquently than I could. I must admit, I was losing my cool with people being irrational about this.

            I don’t know if people are ignoring expense scaling and stock buybacks or purposely choosing to hide it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      241 year ago

      On a tangent, and nothing to do with you, but I don’t like how these streaming companies are being called “streamers”. Streamers are those people streaming on twitch, not a company like Netflix damnit.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    891 year ago

    The slow march back to cable is unstoppable.

    Pirate everything. Share everything.

    Piracy is an access problem, not a consumer problem.

    • Ready! Player 31
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      It turns out cable wasn’t some unique product or way of doing things, it’s just the natural form media delivery takes under capitalism. Streaming services are convergently evolving to take that shape too.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -41 year ago

      I mean that’s not even a little correct.

      Streaming allows you to watch videos on demand, and allows you to choose from a littany of providers, where you were previously limited to whoever laid cable in your neighborhood.

  • Jo Miran
    link
    fedilink
    English
    891 year ago

    Welcome back to the high seas mateys!

    🏴‍☠️

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      I even upgraded my pipe to fiber so I can share Plex with my friends and family. Built a machine with 16TBx6 RAID. Cost me a shit ton more than a year of all the streaming services but fuck them.

      • sebinspace
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        cost me a shit ton

        Yes but now you have an elephantine Silicon Schlong

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Was talking with a friend over lunch about this. I don’t mind paying for media, but the greed I’m seeing from the streaming services now makes me feel like the more ethical choice is to pirate content and just contribute directly to the arts where I can.

      They’re getting to the point where they think that just because they have the platform and the licenses, they can soak their customers. Only a matter of time before the ad men move in. Anyway, fuck all that

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      I never left ye lady-dressin’ barnacle. Leekin’ forward to sail with ye to meet those corporate scallogs for some happy fightin, lootin and rapin’

      R

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    611 year ago

    If I’ve learned anything about corporate lobbying groups it’s that they only exist to fuck you and ruin any legislation that attempts to protect you from them.

    Eat shit SIA.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    55
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Get rid of them. Socialize their service. Host all content at media.gov and take costs out of taxes. We could pay artists more, have 0 ads, all for like $15 per paycheck. Those taxes would fund grants for artists and cover platform costs. No ads. No corporations.

    P.S. you already pay taxes on media through various 3 letter institutions and licensing. It’s not different from what we have other than eliminating the things we all dont like.

    Watch the video. Benn Jordan has done a lot of the heavy lifting for us. This lobby exists to stop that from ever happening and nothing more. Fight them to the death.

    • Obinice
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      How do we socialise these globally important services? Let’s say the Americans socialised all of the services we use heavily every day here in Europe. Netflix, Amazon, Disney, etc etc.

      How will that affect our access to these now internal US National Services? How will it affect our rights and ability to take those services to court - now taking the US State to court instead, when they do something bad?

      How does that increase my rights as a consumer, rather than stifle them?

      You’re forgetting that the USA doesn’t live in a bubble. Other countries exist. This is a global issue.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well, we would have the content we own. We would pay to lease the content we don’t. If any non US residents want a media.gov account, they can pay for one out of pocket what Americans pay in taxes.

        Problem solved.

        It increases your rights as a consumer because it consolidates the location and entity at/to which you pay for that content. You get all the content in one place as opposed to via 12 different accounts.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I can only imagine the delicious conversations about what objectionable art other people are enjoying that ‘their’ tax dollars paid for. Sure, let’s do it.

          And when the GOP holds enough power again we could finally have real US branded State TV! The Trump News Network will live, lol

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    531 year ago

    Could they, instead, band together to offer a service that’s more user friendly than piracy? I suppose bribery is cheaper and easier.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Imagine not being able to force set the resolution and bitrate on your stream, even tho you pay for 4k. (Btw. Same goes for YT) Plex and jellyfin are just superior.

  • Margot Robbie
    link
    fedilink
    English
    401 year ago

    It felt inevitable at some point this was going to happen after they got caught off guard by the strikes to make sure that it never happens again, but the fight is not over yet.

    It’s more important than ever then for you guys to support the WGA and SAG-AFTRA strike, fight for workers, and fight for unions.

    Otherwise, they’ll just keep squeezing and squeezing, until there is nothing left.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    381 year ago

    Streaming has ultimately taught me how little I ‘need’ to watch since it trains you to really only seek out a couple things per service. I’ve also become very advertisment sensitive being blessed with tools to avoid that and companies honeymooning people for a while with fewer ads compared to what cable did.

    Obviously, the dipshits are springing their ‘trap’ but I’m not bullish on the strategy of forcing consumers to suddenly tolerate a return of ads everywhere and always on entertainment. I just see folks running away again/further disconnecting from traditional media.

  • Not A Bird
    link
    fedilink
    English
    371 year ago

    Laws like the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA), which features overly broad definitions of the platforms it targets and has troubling privacy implications thanks to surveillance requirements, could sweep companies like Netflix or Disney up into its dragnet.

    Streaming companies are usually pro-net neutrality, and that’s been a difficult concept for lawmakers and regulators in DC to fully grasp.

    For those that read just the headline. Not everything is black and white.

  • dinckel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    271 year ago

    It’s almost never a pricing issue, but a service issue. They can band together in their bullshit campaign all they want. They’re still not getting my money, because I’m not paying 15 a month, to watch one movie with 7 ads, after which they’ll also sell my data

  • Skybreaker
    link
    fedilink
    English
    221 year ago

    Netflix and others look for power in number$.

    Welcome to the United $tate$ of America, people; Where money is the only thing that matters