• ArtVandelay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yes, the technology to do this is here, and they’re just waiting for the consumer to be able to put up with it.

    • emmy67@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is why I just set up a media server at home.

      It’s mine, you can’t pump it full of ads. All the media is mine and those companies can go fuck themselves.

      Sail those seas folks

    • Miss Millie@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Reading your reply made me think … it’s possible that implying such technology might help rising Free & Open Source culture more … given that FOSS apps are usually ad-free and with no tracking

    • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      They know if they do that people will just disable their cameras or put tape over it like they already do. If they make it so you can’t disable the camera without losing functionality then people won’t buy the product.

      If they try to push it by making a gentleman’s agreement with their competitors to make all tvs or phones use camera eye contact during ads well have to have fight back with more ad blockers and such.