Honestly sheer numbers.
This. I haven’t seen one LBD on lemmy so far!
LBD
Lewy Body Dementia?
Multireddits.
Summit gives the ability to do multi-communities.
This is also my biggest missing feature.
I remember reading a Github issue about it and iirc it is a bit challenging to get it to work with federation.
Users.
I’m ok with that. I went back on reddit after hanging out here for a while. There’s a lot more content of course, but the comment sections were largely trash. A lot of dumb jokes and circlejerks and way too many people to actually converse with anyone.
It also seemed to me that a growing number of comments in recent years there on product-relates posts (e.g., what’s the best language learning app?) reeked of companies promoting their own products rather (e.g., someone’s post history was selectively related to promoting some app after a period of inactivity). I haven’t seen things like that here at all, which is nice.
I remember that too. Always creeped me out.
There’s dozens of us! Dozens!
Users
I love lemmy, don’t get me wrong, but I do miss the niche and specific game and music communities on there. Lemmy is mostly politics and memes at this point. All the more specific communities are very small.
We need some of them karma farming bots that make 80% of the posts over there.
deleted by creator
User and post flairs
This thread is making me love lemmy so much more.
Lengthy analytical comment debates in every trending thread. I’m not saying it’s absent, of course, but there is a distinct lack of detailed high-level discourse.
To be fair, the same has plummeted on Reddit in recent years, but that’s the major drawcard that Lemmy will take years itself to emulate.
Album posts. I’d like to share related pics in one post. Not sure how to do this if it’s already there.
it’s kind of possibile, you just add more than one image to the post
Yeah but not all clients show them properly or make it obvious that there are multiple images and allow you to swipe through all of them.
Which is probably a client issue that could be fixed, but for now, that functionality might as well not exist for a large portion of the users.
I mainly use Liftoff and it looks like it should work, I put the code in, but I don’t have luck with it. I was excited to try Boost again, but that has a very bare bones post screen, so I don’t even try.
I sometimes just use a collage maker to put them into one image, but then they’re small. In trying to build up a picture oriented community ([email protected]) it stinks to not have more options to post media.
Small silly subs, like shaqholdingthings
And about six thousand highly byzantine cat subs.
Wiki pages for communities. It’s a great way to collect useful information that would otherwise get lost in different posts
More granular moderation tools.
But in the last dev AMA they made it clear that wasn’t a priority. Honestly it killed a large chunk of excitement I had about Lemmy. Without ways for mods to keep the communities free of shit heads the communities won’t be sustainable and will stop growing.
As someone frequently labeled as a shithead, I’m glad I’m in a community where I get to stay.
You can still be shitty in those communities too, but with better moderation tools other people who want a space without bigots and hatred can still maintain those. So we can have both, right now it’s mainly the shitty people that are happy. Which is not good for building lasting communities.
Oh no I don’t act shitty. I said I get labeled a shithead.
I might be alone in this, but everyone always talks shit about recommendations or “the algorithm” on a lot of platforms. It’s really important though. There’s a difference in usability if you see what you like really quick. If you want to make sure ppl don’t get it if they don’t need it, make it a new tab.
I really think Lemmy is great and it’s potential is even greater, but users and ease of use are the bottleneck rn, and that goes for every aspect of it.
I don’t mind algorithm feeds as long as it’s not the default view and as long as it’s not mingled with the normal feed. Reddit is an example of the latter case. They mix “promoted” content as well as “you visited a subreddit once so we think you’ll like this post” content along with posts from subreddits you subscribe to. I find that annoying.
So I wouldn’t mind if Lemmy had an algorithm to recommend posts as long as it was in a “recommended posts” section. Then people who want it could click over to it and people who don’t like that could just ignore it.
Finding “subLemmy’s”. I just browse the main page and block the sublemmys i dont like.
You can search for communities and subscribe to them. Then you can select “subscribed” instead of “local” or “all”
I think what theyre getting at is lemmy doesnt really have a good way to discover sublemmies. A lot of the subs ive found were through all when they just happened to pop up now and again rather than specifically searching for a particular topic. Thats not a very fast way to find new communities. Which you could argue reddit doesnt do a great job of it either but lemmy is in a position where it cant afford to be inefficient.
deleted by creator
after you sign up to reddit, it will ask you to pick a few things you like from a tag cloud. it will then try and show you more of that.
I hated that. I used to burn reddit accounts after about 2 months snd every time that part sucked because the only options were like “fashion,” “basketball,” “Game of Thrones,” and other big stuff. If it let me search for the specific subs I knew I wanted, it would be been fine. But no, it had me select random interests. Algotithm-generated content suggestions are the death of the true internet.
deleted by creator
You could skip it but everytime you loaded the app or tried to switch to the home page, it would give the same prompt.
Videos hosting or someway to more seamlessly share video content. The Reddit player sucked fat donkey dicks, but the idea of viewing video in a post instead of clicking out to some rando site is much preferred.
doesn’t the app embed the video anyway? at least for the more common ones
