• WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The project is designed to raise awareness of what is possible with this technology.

    This has nothing to do with smart glasses, and everything to do with surveillance capitalism. You could do the same thing with a smartphone, or any camera + computer. All this does is highlight how everyones most sensitive data has been aggregated by numerous corporations and is available to anyone who will pay for it. There was a time when Capitalism used to equate itself as the “free” and privacy preserving antithesis to Soviet style communist surveillance, yet no KGB agent ever had access to a system with 1/100th the surveillance capabilities that 21st century capitalism now sells freely for profit. If you need proof, a couple of college students were able to create every stalking victims worst nightmare.

    • vzq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean sort of.

      It does mean that walking around with smart glasses will have people potentially reacting to you like you are waving a recording smartphone in their face.

      Which is not great for product adoption, if you get my drift.

    • SomeGuy69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Pretty much no phone is directed at everyone else’s face all the time, that alone is the huge difference. It’s the differences between someone using their phone and someone actively holding it upright to record the crowd. Surveillance cameras might be out there too but they aren’t sighted by everyone (different by country, some even have to deleted after 24h, unless there was a crime).

      People quickly would tell you to stop recoding, if you’d hold up your phone all the time, even in situations where you’re closer to each other, like in public transport.

  • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Now we just need to use the user information to check their net worth, and if it’s above a certain amount it needs to hover a quest marker above that person. I’m curious to see how long before privacy laws get stronger.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      They’ll probably just end up making a (very expensive) method of obscuring themselves from the recognition tech. That way they won’t need to pass any laws, and ad companies (or cops or anyone else who knows how to jailbreak their hardware. Probably) can still take advantage of the technology in some way.

      Because 💰

  • mesamune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 months ago

    A company called Clearview AI broke that unwritten rule and developed a powerful facial recognition system using billions of images scraped from social media. Primarily, Clearview sells its product to law enforcement. Clearview has also explored a pair of smart glasses that would run its facial recognition technology. The company signed a contract with the U.S. Air Force on a related study.

    Just another reason to not post all your images to social media. Share with family/friends who care but thats it.

    • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Right?! That is all it takes to save your privacy is just not having social media but noone is willing to do that.

      • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        The main concern I have is unavoidably having my picture taken. Say I go to a family gathering, of course they will take my picture if it’s a big event. They then will probably share it everywhere. I can’t reasonably say “don’t post this picture on the internet” they probably will.

    • xavier666@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Do not share the image in a private Facebook group. Don’t post it on popular direct messaging services.

      The only way (which I still don’t trust), some privacy-preserving E2E encrypted file storage server or (which I trust) via your own Matrix server.

      • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        private Facebook group

        Does such a thing actually exist? Seems that “private” and “Facebook” really shouldn’t be in the same sentence together.

        • xavier666@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          People (the general populace) think that if a group visibility is set to Private, then it’s truly private 🤷🏻

  • xodoh74984@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Surely the original “someone” is Meta. Good to have a redundant system I guess /s