A former jockey who was left paralyzed from the waist down after a horse riding accident was able to walk again thanks to a cutting-edge piece of robotic tech: a $100,000 ReWalk Personal exoskeleton.

When one of its small parts malfunctioned, however, the entire device stopped working. Desperate to gain his mobility back, he reached out to the manufacturer, Lifeward, for repairs. But it turned him away, claiming his exoskeleton was too old, *404 media *reports.

“After 371,091 steps my exoskeleton is being retired after 10 years of unbelievable physical therapy,” Michael Straight posted on Facebook earlier this month. “The reasons why it has stopped is a pathetic excuse for a bad company to try and make more money.”

  • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    147
    ·
    2 months ago

    Fortunately, Lifeward eventually capitulated and Straight was able to get his exoskeleton repaired — but that was only after an intense campaign in which he went on local TV, got highlighted in a horse industry publication, and gained steam on social media. If it weren’t for that, he could still be struggling to find a way to get his mobility back again.

    Uhg, needed bad PR before they changed their mind

  • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    2 months ago

    Prosthetics that are no longer supported, should be fully open sourced.And the copyright should immediately expire.

    Support your products, or let others do it.

    • kritzkrieg@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Tbh, I didn’t even think prosthetics could be proprietary. It’s kinda ghoulish to make it so they can be “outdated” when needing minor stuff repaired.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      He can’t. He’s paralyzed and his exoskeleton is broken.

      On a more serious note, the 404media article (login wall) reports the problem was that the wristwatch controller for the exoskeleton had its battery wire’s solder joint break. They seem to be trying to frame it as a right to repair issue, but that’s a trivial repair for anyone with basic electronics experience.

      • quixotic120@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s a trivial repair assuming that’s the extent of the damage and there’s not any quirks associated with an extremely complex medical device that has no documentation whatsoever. Like maybe after not having the controller’s power supply connected for such a length of time there needs to be a calibration process upon bringing it back to life that can only be done with proprietary software

        The biggest thing though is that by going in and fixing it yourself you open yourself to the possibility that the company will now say “oh this was worked on by someone else and that’s why it’s broken, we won’t work on it now”. That’s the state of repair rights in America, vendors are openly hostile to people who fix their own things even if they do it sufficiently. We used to have political representation that gave us regulations to allow us to work on and even modify our cars without impacting the warranty but that’s been eroded and there’s not really anything of that nature for tech stuff (other than judgements saying broken warranty seals don’t count for anything)

        • Zak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          here’s not really anything of that nature for tech stuff

          The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act does not exclude tech stuff. The problem is that it’s a lot harder to work on tech stuff without insider information than 1970s cars.

  • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is something I wish cyberpunk media touched more on.

    One thing I always thought about when playing cyberpunk 2077 is why wouldn’t companies have a failsafe for their equipment being used against them. In the game, you can use cyber decks from Arisaka and Militech and be able to hack and assault their infrastructure and employees with impunity.

    I am not really sure companies would allow that…

    • III@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      Overlooking the concept of a failsafe? How did they get past the concept of the subscription model?

      • BilliamBoberts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I always imagined that it was due to a higher level of computer literacy amongst the consumer population. An hour after a corpo releases a new piece of tech under a subscription model, the software has been cracked and pirated all over the net.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      why wouldn’t companies have a failsafe for their equipment being used against them

      Because they got tired of paying for the whiny engineers that would have to implement the failsafe and so they fired them all.

      • III@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        so they fired them all

        Even fictional evil companies need to meet goals set by the board.

    • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Presumably those failsafes can be circumvented and your character being a cool hacker applies those exploits to their hardware.

    • drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s the problem with cyberpunk as a genre. Its to cool. The first Deus Ex did it right. If it was in the hands of a better developer Watch Dogs could have too.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I work in appliance repair. My favorite appliance to fix are sub zero refrigerators. They’re easy to work on, straight forward and the company continues to support their product as far back as models from the 1970s.

    Subzero makes nothing more than household appliances a thankless industry plagued by planner obsolescence and they can supply parts for their appliances longer than a medical company.

      • mechoman444@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is a very good question.

        I’m assuming you mean a range around $5000?

        In that case there’s really not much in that specific price range.

        Ranges in general can cost between 500 and 3000 dollars for a regular range you can get at your local appliance retailer. Here in the states that would be like home Depot or Lowe’s.

        If you wanted more high end than that you’d have to go much higher up in price. Like past $10000. It’s a weird market for ranges.

        I recommend Frigidaire for cooking appliances in general they make really good ranges. For less than $1000 dollars you can get a very decent appliance.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    Anything related to healthcare has no business being any closer to the whims of “the market” than the public roads.

    It would be unheard of for a government to stop maintaining a public road because whomever was supplying some ingredient of the asphalt said that particular mix is “to old and the new mix is not compatible with the roads created using the old mix”.

    They don’t want to do it anymore, fine, then provide whatever is needed for someone else to maintain it for the cost of the materials to print/email/upload to GitHub the technical documents. It should not be legal to get someone hooked on your life altering medical device then rug pull them like this.

  • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    371k steps over 10 years is like 100 steps per day. Is it really slow, or did he only use it once a week?

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 months ago

      My guess is he would use a wheelchair at home where the area is prepared to accommodate it. The exoskeleton is likely slower and harder to wear around the house, but can make him mobile in places where a wheelchair can’t go.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    [Insert Steel Ball Run Reference Here Because Someone Mentioned A Paralyzed Jockey]

    Anyway…

    Human Greed is what’s obsolete and it is beyond past time to end support for it.

  • pingveno@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I was ready to hear something like a story from someone who had signed onto a medical trial and was upset the trial was ending. Nope, instead an absurdly short support period that seemingly is fed by the same culture of replacement over repair that has infected our economy.

  • VerbFlow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Immeasurably great reporting. This was painful to yet, but a blessing to know.