All these (ad)ons always take priority over performance.

  • relyn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    150
    ·
    1 year ago

    Am I the only one who doesn’t want any, “do everything,” apps? I’d rather have 10 apps that each do one thing really well than have one app that haphazardly attempts to do 10 things.

    • afunkysongaday@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      Make each program do one thing well. To do a new job, build afresh rather than complicate old programs by adding new “features”.

      Unix philosophy. 50 years old idea. Imo devs would love to work that way but they are never the ones making decisions. And every CEO wants to have the new everything app ala wechat.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I want to shop for something online, I’ll go to a website like Amazon.

      If I want to transfer money online, I’ll go to a website like PayPal.

      I don’t like the monopolizing those companies are doing, but they’re at least more transparent than doing it through a chat app. Can you even do returns for chat app purchases? I did a return with Amazon the other day and they just credited my account. They didn’t even ask for the book (I accidentally bought 2 copies) back.

  • Neptune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    WhatsApp is a shithole. Communities, Channels, Payments, Avatars all these destroyed the simple chat app. Meta is aiming for a monopoly here.

    Signal and Telegram pretty much useless if you don’t have your needful people on the platform.

    • lattenwald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thankfully I don’t have people I need on WhatsApp, but it took some convincing.

      Nowadays I only have dentist and barbershop on WhatsApp, all my folks are on Telegram, including all work communications.

      WhatsApp was always lacking features; WhatsApp web can’t replace a full featured desktop client which is a must have for me; and its mobile client is inconvenient in every possible way.

    • RobertOwnageJunior@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s just not a battle I am willing to fight. Too many people I can’t contact without Whatsapp and none of them willing to swap.

  • Synapse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    Great, I can’t wait for Whatsapp to be the only way to reach customer support and make payments. I always felt the confused look of people when I tell them I don’t have Whatsapp wasn’t enough.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        And WeChat sucks. The only reason it dominates in China is because the government mandated a bunch of social control stuff to run there making it virtually mandatory just to exist in China.

        • ours@lemmy.film
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Western VCs wished they could have their shitty app being mandatory.

          Look at El Musk and his “X app” obsession. He wants it so bad he burned the brand he paid BILLIONS to acquire just to chase his everything app.

          • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think part of his plan was to quickly roll crypto into it… but then by the time he actually acquired it Crypto took a huge downturn.

    • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If only there was a standards-based platform that everyone could use, supported by all telecommunications providers. Ah dammit. Probably just a pipe dream. /s

      • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Back in my day, the only decentralized communication we needed was yelling from the rooftops and we turned out just fine!

  • DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    At the company’s global Conversations event in Mumbai, WhatsApp introduced an in-app shopping feature for merchants and customers. Dubbed ”Flows,” […]

    That name sounds more like a feminine hygiene product than a shopping platform.

  • Tolstoy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are there any WhatsApp clients without all the crap noone asking for?

  • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is kind of funny. Some of these features I would see see as Google’s turf. However, since Google can’t create a text messaging service, Meta can use their messaging app to encroach.

  • avater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    it really depends.

    If it’s different parts of the same system I really don’t like if it gets split up to multiple apps. Take steam, there I need two apps, one for the general store and it’s functions and one for communicating with my friends. In that case I’d rather would have one app that fits all.

    But if I don’t need several functions of an app and they are also hurting the experience with it, I’d rather would have the sourced out to other apps.