• blindbunny@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m pretty sure you’re the most famous person to use Lemmy. Well besides Margot Robbie

    • Silverchase@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      Newgrounds is dead serious about preserving its content, even with the death of Flash. Ruffle, the Flash emulator, was created by a former employee and Newgrounds is a major sponsor of the project. The most important movies have been converted to video as well.

      When Newgrounds adopted high-resolution thumbnails about a decade and a half ago, there was a big volunteer campaign to recreate thumbnails for the entire back catalogue of the portal.

      Thanks to Ruffle, people can and are still submitting Flash content to the portal, in addition to web-friendly content!

  • Mars2k21@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    3 months ago

    Newgrounds would be awesome in the Fediverse tbh, would bring so much content (beyond politics and news).

    Image hosting seems to be super problematic with activity pub, especially with something pf Newgrounds’ size. I’m super invested in this, can’t wait to see where it’ll go.

    • cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’d love to be able to “seed” the fediverse through p2p hosting of some sort. I’d set aside 1 TB of storage and 20 MB/s for that.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah I’ve thought a tiny bit about this but it gets dodgy with things like csam.

        How do we address some one uploading stuff that would get you arrested?

        • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          There’s gotta be some kind of limited liability for this kind of thing. I mean, banks wouldn’t be liable if someone put csam in a safe deposit box or (assuming they don’t x-ray packages) UPS shipping csam in a sealed package. I think there just needs to be reasonable safeguards against it but I don’t know if any of that is built into the software.

          • SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            Issue here is that what’s in a safe deposit box isn’t also being shared/distributed. It is locked away.

            If, however, they made copies of the contents of a box and put it in other boxes … and it came out somebody used that for CSAM then there probably would be some kind of liability.

            Besides CSAM there’s also copyrighted material, etc which section 230 kind of covers but even then gets tricky since there’s a duty to respond to DMCA takedowns in order to get safe harbor protections.

          • pedroapero@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Unfortunately we are at a point where Cisco Cloudflare and Google are held liable for filesharing-related domains their DNS relays are resolving IPs for…

        • eskimofry@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Probably arrange it such that not one person/server knows what the stored bytes are. There can be a server where the bytes/blocks get reconstructed where one can check for the bad stuff.

  • sag@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Hell Yeah, Newgrounds is blocked in my country. But if they added Activity Pub it will solve the problem for me.

  • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    but is concerned about hosting fees for serving images to millions of people

    People stopped caring about image bandwidth decades ago. Try wrangling a video-hosting problem, like PeerTube does.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Can’t they just not allow anyone on their server? Like read-only while people talk about it from other servers?