A Russian kamikaze drone on Wednesday flew into NATO air space and detonated near a Romanian village, Ukrainian news reports said, but official Bucharest said the fact of the strike wasn’t confirmed and that they would check.

Ukrainian social media video recorded in the river port city of Izmail, opposite Plaura, showed an orange flash lighting up the night horizon and a booming blast on the Romanian side of the river. Flames and smoke reaching hundreds of meters into the sky were visible following the explosion. A Russian kamikaze drone strike against Izmail had been in progress at the time.

  • pingveno@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m going to say the same thing that I said about the Polish incident. That incident only happened because Russia chose to attack Ukraine in an area directly bordering on another country. Izmail is also right across the border. I’ll wait on more dependable sources for an investigation, and I’m certainly not agitating for an escalation on NATO’s side. At the same time, if Russia’s bombing campaign ultimately results in foreseeable casualties outside of the country, I put the blame on Russia. Ukraine has the right to defend itself.

  • thorbot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    WAR CRIMB PROSECUTOR

    I’m sorry comedic disassociation is the only way I can cope with heavy shit like this

    • sandbox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      an unmanned drone harmlessly crashing into a field isn’t going to kick off world war 3… at least I sure hope not.

      • bouh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        While this is not worthy of ww3, defending nato member space is something nato can and should do. Whether the strike is intended or not, nato is legitimate to defend the area to prevent a strike. More than legitimate in fact.

        • sandbox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’m sure NATO has already attended to the scene to defend against a small pile of debris scattered in a field.

            • sandbox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              Since we’re providing missiles to Ukraine, a whole bunch of NATO missiles are landing in Crimea, I’m sure. I’d prefer if the war ended, personally, with a fully independent Ukraine.

              Sorry for not wanting a massive death toll over something that literally doesn’t matter at all. If Russia intentionally hit some Romanian village with an attack, then a response would be justified. Some random trash accidentally crashing near the border doesn’t matter.

              That doesn’t make me a russian troll, it just makes me a relatively sensible person.

      • Kalkaline @leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t want young men to die, I want the Russians to go home, return Ukrainian sovereign territory, and live peacefully. I don’t want Russians bombing and killing Ukraine or any other nation. I want them to fuck off, and if they won’t fuck off, I want the Ukrainian military to kill them all and protect themselves.

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Great, we all want the same thing, why is Ukraine and NATO not working toward a peace agreement? Why did NATO give weapons to Ukraine to propagate a war that they were always going to lose?

        • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          War is death. There is no glory. There is no pride. None of them are heroes by choice, and many never feel like heroes after their friends die by their side.

          War is violence. A desire of man to take with force the independence of a people and exchange that for subservience under the guise of land, resources, need.

          Young people are tricked to serve. Recruited to become servants, coerced through deceit to don colors and weapons. Made to repeat mistakes because smaller men want and are not freely given. To solely defend and defy the overreaching end of a tyrant’s sword is to fight for reason earned from treachery and desire.

          Humanity is not defined by grief. We are defined by the selfless acts of love and kindness in the darkest hours. Make no mistake; monsters do exist, and the worst are never the ones in harm’s way.

          • legion02@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            But sometimes you need to punch a bully in the mouth to protect the subject of their bullying. The only thing needed for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. In this case it would be a selfless act of love and kindness.

            • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              When an individual does that, they are doing so with a clear choice that they made. In a war, men die and leave families behind, and because they chose to defend their country, they are used to defend the interests of those with long swords and heavy sticks. They die without a choice far too often because they were tricked into believing they defend their homes.

              All too often they’re forced into conflict that has very little to do with that choice. If our military didn’t try so hard to coerce and trick younger people into joining and thus being forced into conflict, I would be a bit less resentful and hateful towards the practice. That, however, is not the case.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Trying to keep things more civil, but seems that I was not wrong in my assessment. You should really go sign up for the foreign legion.

          • fernlike3923@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yeah, no lol. This was a troll comment from the start, so please don’t take it seriously.

            Although, seeing what essentially triggered WW1, I wouldn’t be too surprised if Romania actually invokes Article 5 since this is just another world war waiting to happen after years of built up pressure (The invasion of Ukraine, nuclear threats from North Korea, the East gathering up allies etc.).

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              6 months ago

              Article 5 has absolutely no meaning unless US decides that it wants to fight Russia directly, which would result in a nuclear holocaust and end of our civilization. Europe simply does not have the industrial capacity to keep up with Russia on its own, nor does it have a cohesive and experienced army that could possibly stand up to Russia.

    • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Just because Article 5 is activated doesn’t mean we’re going to war. It was activated on 9/11.

      There’s a small small chance Article 4 will be activated, which could be used for some mobilization (but is clerical, to summon NATO for discussion). But I think nothing happens.