Looks like someone took some shots at prez candidate Donald Trump at a rally in PA. From the videos I’ve seen, it looks like he did get grazed.

  • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    149
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    6 months ago

    Half the comments here are proving that people on the right aren’t the only ones who can indulge in stupid conspiracy theories.

    It’s depressing as fuck.

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      What I find sad is that either option is equally plausible. That’s how low we have sunk.

        • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          0.01% chance based on what?

          I think being unsure either way makes perfect sense. You gotta admit it doesn’t really line up with Trump’s character to be posing for the cameras if he’s actually being shot at. Though tou’re not wrong to say, that that isn’t proof of anything. It’s subjective feeling.

          But, I think saying it’s entirely unlikely this was orchestrated isn’t right either.

            • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              I’m not claiming anything. It’s just really, really early after the event.

              My choice of words was not ideal, and I apologize for that.

              I’m just saying being unsure of what happened isn’t crazy so soon after the event.

              You’re out here saying what is and is not likely based on your own feelings about what you feel is true.

              It’s simply too early to say anything definitive about what level of conspiracy existed (in the traditional sense, of more than one person, conspiring).

              I am not saying this was staged. I’m saying you’re jumping the gun, to say so confidently it wasn’t.

    • fxt_ryknow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      On this topic as a whole, it’s also proving people on the left are in favor of gun violence…

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Not like it really needs proving. When Marx writes about “revolution,” he means bloody, violent revolution.

        Anyone advocating revolution needs guns to back it up or else they’re just full of hot air.

        • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Elections were meant to be bloodless revolutions. Unfortunately with First Past The Post voting, the right options were not available to vote for. But we can change how we vote. We can make peaceful revolution possible with a more representative electoral system.

        • SeaJ@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Not every time at all. Franco, Salazar, and Pinochet were not defeated via guns.