• Eezyville@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well looking on the bright side. If death threats are starting to become common for the decisions that companies make then maybe WFH should also be common to protect employees. Can’t target employees at an empty office. The employees will have to be careful with social media however.

    • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Personally I’m leaning more towards wanting to handle the death threats themselves.

      Because ya know they would continue and now you have to arm your home because corporate greed

      Hate this idea a lot

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        because or corporate greed

        Corporate greed didn’t force these lunatics to have a gamer moment. There are ways to express displeasure that aren’t fucking death threats man.

        • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Never once did I say corporate greed was a root cause , just the logical cause to the specific predicament I was speaking of.

          No shit the terrorist is the source of the issue.

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well it seems like there we’re no death threats and the CEO largely made this up basically as an excuse to close the office.

      For the record it was a single employee, there were no people sending them death threats.