• AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    While the labels give retailers the ability to increase prices suddenly, Gallino doubts companies like Walmart will take advantage of the technology in that way. “To be honest, I don’t think that’s the underlying main driver of this,” Gallino said. “These are companies that tend to have a long-term relationship with their customers and I think the risk of frustrating them could be too risky, so I would be surprised if they try to do that.”

    How to tell if an academic doesn’t get out enough.

    • tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah every store values client loyalty, but pretending companies (e.g. Walmart for crissakes) want to be loyal to their customers should disqualify you from being called an “industry analyst”.

    • sudo42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Probably the same guy that says inflation is “not a problem/getting better/under control”.

      Are these people just available for hire by the media? Are they like professional witnesses for “two sides” reporting?

      • pdxfed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Inflation is largely not a problem, corporate price gouging accounts for the bulk of increases. Price gouging increases are an enormous fucking problem for people. Calling it inflation is their script, don’t adopt their language.

        Consolidation or competitors that has been allowed almost unabated the last 25 years exacerbates the effects.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Oh Ffs, what a fucking idiot, or liar, probably both.

      Of course that’s the whole fucking point, you over-educated fucktard.

      And people wonder why the average Joe mistrusts academia?

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I mean there are clear savings advantages to switching to electronic tags. It takes like 30 to 100 man hours every week to swap out labels depending on store size. Thats like 20 to 50k a year you can save on labor by just having them automatically update each week.

        Plus the tags/price strips right now aren’t free. Probably another 5k you save a year

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    10 months ago

    So, if these prices can be so easily updated, surely the retailers can now include tax in the listed price. It’s very simple automated math of course…

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      Ads are digital. The price ranges become digital. They have no excuse.

      I’m sure you’ll still get those bootlickers defending the practice of not including tax, but they will make even less sense than before.

    • NoisyFlake@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Wait, you’re telling me that the price on the shelf doesn’t include tax where you live?

      • Grunt4019@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s standard in the US for the listed price to not include any taxes.

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Of course not. It lets their office or even corporate computers change the prices in real time whenever they feel like it. Hypothetically, you could pick something off a shelf where the digital signset $3, and by the time you walked it up to a register, it cost $4. It’s like changing the price of something in a shop simulation video game after the customer has picked it up, and now they have to pay $9,999.99 for a bag of potato chips.

      • chaospatterns@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        That would be illegal. I worked on the software deployment of these devices in a store. If we increased the price, we’d automatically give the customer the lowest price in the last several hours.

        The other problem was they were extremely low powered and low bandwidth and it would have killed the battery to update more than a few times a day.

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    Imagine walking down the aisle, normal day, no thoughts about the prices or any of that.

    Then one day you walk down the aisle but this time you forgot your phone in the car.

    Different prices. Then some one walks is coming close from the other end of the aisle. The price changes. They walk past, nonplussed. A few seconds later, it switches back.

  • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is illegal in my state. I’d be interested to see how it complies with other states’ price tag laws and labeling requirements.

  • dkc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    I hope there’s pushback on this. They mention prices can change as often as 10 seconds. Meaning you can add something to your cart and by the time you check out the price has gone up. That seems like false advertising. Will the store associates have a way to override the cost if we make a fuss and ask them to price match the items to the cost when we added them to our carts?

    It feels like this is another area where technology is advancing faster than our consumer protection laws. I suppose another thing to write your local representatives about. I’d hope legislation protecting a family grocery shopping would be an easy win for politicians and bipartisan.

  • uebquauntbez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    I see different prices for each customer depending if the shelfs are full or nearly empty. Market rulez!1!! Or prices according to (estimated) customers income.

  • JoeKrogan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    The race to the bottom continues imagine all the useful things we could be doing instead of this fucking shit just to take more from the pockets of people. Fuck this shit

  • Thistlewick@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Some of my local supermarkets have these already. The worst part is that they use real shitty, dark displays. It was always easy to see the price when it was black ink on white or yellow paper, but trying to check the price on what amounts to a calculator screen at ten paces is horrid. Doesn’t help that the displays are so much smaller than paper tags, and the stores like to put the “3 for $10” as the priority, meaning the actual unit price is millimetres tall.

  • peanutyam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    We already have this in Australia - my local supermarkets are all using electronic pricing labels - you cannot tell if prices have changed and they can literally change them whilst you are in the store - you cannot even tell when something is on special anymore as the large paper tags you used to see have all gone in the name of “saving the environment” - which is absolute garbage considering we are subjected to a grocery store duopoly in Australia who are renowned for price gouging….

  • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Huh they’ve been in various brands and stores in Canada for atleast a few years. Surprised it didn’t start down there and make its way up here.