• pyromaster55@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    1 year ago

    I see boomers posting “Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times.” on FB all the time, and they genuinely, unironically think they were here >strong men create good times< instead of where they really were, here >good times create weak men<, and so now we are absolutely here >weak men create hard times< thanks to them.

    They’re just so close to seeing the point.

    • Mudface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The actual baby boomers were the weak men created by the good times.

      The strong men created by hard times were their parents who fought in wwi and wwii

      My generation (millennial/gen x) is also weak.

      My children’s generation, unfortunately, might be the ones who grow to be strong, if we don’t turn around this disaster

  • Heavybell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Boomers assuming people become conservative as a function of time as opposed to a function of “getting theirs”. I have no evidence but it seems to be you’re less likely to become conservative without having amassed some wealth to conserve…

  • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Historically, people have become more conservative, not as they age, but as they become more financially secure, own their own home, and want to keep more of the fruits of their labour.

    That’s increasingly not happening, and we’re not happy about it.

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    “You need to have a sense of ownership and responsibility for your community.”

    “So you’re actually going to let me invest in the community and own things?”

    “What? No! Jesus, no. I want you to feel responsible for my stuff and work to preserve a status quo that will never serve you.”

  • EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    In the UK we have something called the “Shy Tory Factor”, where opinion polls almost always favour the left, because people will tell people (including pollsters) that they voted for one party, but then voted in a way they view they will be judged against.

    IIRC it’s also noted in US politics, and IMO it’s highly likely that in certain areas you’ll find many people that will say all the right things in public, but secretly prefer Trump over Biden, regardless of what either party stands for.

    • AquaTofana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      God this is a depressing thought. We have enough people here who ARE already publicly vocal for the likes of our far right. To think that there are posers is kinda as terrifying as it is believable.

  • mommykink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Doesn’t matter if they “become socialist” if they still vote for the same 2 party system. Democrats will never allow America to become actually left-wing

  • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Even as a perfectly self centered capitalist I would still pick more socialism. System has not bought my loyalty, so why should I care about it?

  • RedTie13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seeing youth orgs like TPUSA and YAF on college and high school campuses means that we might have to start playing at their own game and not just take kids becoming socialist as default.