On Tuesday, voters in Crook County passed measure 7-86, which asked voters if they support negotiations to move the Oregon/Idaho border to include Crook County in Idaho.  The measure is passing with 53% of the vote, and makes Crook County the 13th county in eastern Oregon to pass a Greater Idaho measure.

  • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    1 year ago

    These people want to abandon everything that makes their lives great for… (checks notes) The rights to control women, marry children, and to burn crosses on their ethnic neighbors lawn.

    • Donkter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Mostly (and this is probably true for over 60% of Republicans), it’s about defunding half of the government programs they rely on but don’t realize it, sold to them through the euphemism of “tax cuts”.

      I think the right to control women is next on the list, but even then we see that even republican public opinion on abortions is stricter than the left’s, but would actually prefer less extreme laws than what has been passed.

      As much of a meme as it is, most rural religious folk aren’t militant about marrying children and burning crosses. We hear about every instance of child marriage cause it sucks so much, and people have been openly, violently racist despite the law for centuries, all it takes is a town full of like-minded people.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    some 300 people live in some of those counties, which is like a city block in portland. If they want to be idaho so much why not just move there?

    • Sippy Cup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can really sympathize with these guys. I live in a blue dot in one of the reddest states in the country. I have been talking with my friends about doing this exact thing.

      Technically this is not secession. It’s partitioning. They want to partition themselves and join Idaho. Just like I’d love to partition my city away from the shit hole parasitic state it’s attached to.

      The state level representation just isn’t there for them. They’re so dramatically in the minority that they have no voice in state government at all. So changes are mandated to them, and they’re disillusioned. They love their home and they want the government to recognize them.

      Set aside the crazy bullshit they want. The grievance is legitimate, the government completely ignores their desires, they haven’t been able to get the government to acknowledge that, and so they retaliate by saying they don’t want to be a part of it anymore.

      To be clear, there is no resolution for people in this situation. They have no control over the state government, no ability to change it. The only choice is to leave, and faced with moving or a long shot at leaving or taking your home with you, you’d choose to take your home, every time.

      • PenisWenisGenius@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What do they want that Idaho can provide that Oregon can’t? Some people have to flee entire states over abortion laws for lifesaving medical procedures and they’re told stuff like “well if you don’t like it just move”.

        • harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The ability to be more open about being white supremacist garbage. Idaho is a dumpster fire - the state is suffering shortages of medical professionals because of the GQP.

        • Sippy Cup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I appreciate that. And this is a great example to whip out when those idiots say shit like that. Obviously moving isn’t an option for most people and for those whom it is, they likely have.

          What exactly they want isn’t important, just that it’s very much the opposite of how the state is being run. Admittedly some of the demands fall under crazy bullshit, but the central issue is agency. Politically speaking they have very little, and this is the one lever left to them to pull.

          Imagine you’re on a train of trolleys, and every time it comes to a point where a direction could be chosen, every car votes and consistently the ones at the back are out voted by the other cars. You can’t get off and buy another ticket. But you might be able to detach the cars.

          Furthermore, reorganization like this should be done far more frequently than it’s being done. Why shouldn’t we allow disparate peoples of similar opinions vote together and govern each other? Why are we locked in to the lines on a map, the last major change of which happened in 1867. Since then, the borders have remained relatively unchanged.

          Not only should they, a group of people I likely hold only one fundamental belief in common with, not be afforded some self governance?

          • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Admittedly some of the demands fall under crazy bullshit, but the central issue is agency.

            It’s like saying “it’s not about slavery, it’s about states rights.”

      • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is caused by Gerrymandering and antidemocratic voter suppression. But Republicans don’t want to fix those issues because they’d be a regional party overnight limited to just the south.

        • Sippy Cup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          26
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is something both parties are guilty of. Neither is all that interested in fixing it until they’re the victims of it.

          This doesn’t get fixed with a two party system.

          • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ah yes, those vote suppressing Democrats…

            I do think there needs to be a dissolution of the parties, but accusing both sides of being the same is not valid nor useful in the state (lol, country?) that we currently live in.

            • Sippy Cup@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’m not saying both sides are the same. I’m accusing two different political parties of employing the same shitty tactics, which they most definitely are.

              Is one party more guilty of it? Sure. But denying that the Democrats are gerrymandering is delusional.

              Oregon’s 2021 congressional map received an F from the gerrymandering project for giving one party a significant advantage.

              https://gerrymander.princeton.edu/redistricting-report-card?planId=rec6qj1vAOKsBnXnu

              Drawn and enacted exclusively by Democrats.

              Don’t lie to yourself. They’re still fucking politicians.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Though it is only 53% of them that want this. Not that I think that should cancel the entire vote, but it should complicate the situation because a 6% difference shouldn’t change the situation into one that 47% don’t want.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well half of them at any rate. I guess the other half just get shit on? Usually these kinds of measures require more like 3/4 votes.

      • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The grievance is legitimate, the government completely ignores their desires…

        I see your point, but their “desires” are to oppress or kill the normal people, so I just don’t see their grievances as legitimate. Conservatives are furious that they are unable to use legislation to further their conservative values of racism, homophobia, misogyny, xenophobia, transphobia, antisemitism and other conservative bigotry. There is simply no room in a modern culture for hate-based ideologies like conservatism.

        We should not legitimize their harmful desires by recognizing their “grievances”. Instead, we should marginalize hate by marginalizing the haters.

        In short, fuck 'em.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This is why proportional voting is good. The best answer is to give them more accurate representation as part of oregon.

        Without some trade for like a blue part of idaho this trade just stacks the deck one way. not 100% of the people in those districts want to leave and there’s blue parts of idaho, why not trade those for red parts of oregon if it’s “just partitioning” why abandon the 20-49% of whomever is in those red districts that would go straight back to being unrepresented

        No, this is just right wingers wanting things 100% their way with no reasonable offer on the the table. There’s no “legitimacy” here.

      • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Slight addendum: they own small parcels of land surrounded by public land that pay miniscule fees to use as they please for ranching.

  • Pretzilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yea this might have something to do with it

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/may/24/people-rights-network-oregon-elections

    At least 66 members of far-right group in rural Oregon standing for office

    Revealed: anti-government People’s Rights Network, founded by Ammon Bundy, appearing to follow ‘entryism’ strategy

    At least 66 members of an anti-government group founded by far-right militia figure Ammon Bundy have attempted to win local positions of influence in the Republican party in Oregon, the Guardian can reveal.

    The candidates stood for Republican precinct committee person (PCP) slots in three central Oregon counties in this week’s elections, with some facing no opponent and thus winning their positions by default. The role of PCPs includes electing the executive of the county-level GOP apparatus.

    The move is part of what appears to be a coordinated attempt to capture the local Republican party infrastructure, following a far-right strategy of “entryism” into more mainstream political bodies.

  • shikitohno@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m sure it won’t happen, but there’s a part of me that would just love to hear that when the negotiations get to Idaho, Idaho is just like “Nah, hard pass, we don’t want you either.”

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The parts of Oregon wanting this are rabidly anti-tax. The instant they find out Idaho has a 6% sales tax they’ll cry and come crawling right back.

    • sparkle@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      Cymraeg
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Conservatives are super pro-sales tax because it’s regressive taxation. A common fake-libertarian argument is “we don’t need income taxes, we can just have sales taxes”.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is so damn odd, it’s a state. Just move. It’s not another country. Shit like this is what makes me think we should just abolish the states honestly. This mindset is weird

    • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some people are too poor to move. Just move is an insane idea and we need to eradicate it.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Just move is a perfectly legitimate idea when the only reason you want to move is because a political ideology. Not even political ideology wanting to impose your political ideology. If this was an economic issue I would never say just move. If this was a persecution issue I would never say just move. If this was any legitimate issue I would never say just move. However this is obviously, pathetically obviously, none of those things. They don’t like the people around them. They’re bigots. Bigots should move.

        Frankly I think it’s absurd that you’re even suggesting that they have some kind of legitimate gripe. Equating their issue to anything legitimate is beyond ignorant.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Seems like a stupid vote then: choose to leave a state with at least some services to join one without, just to make it easier for a few landowners to extract resources without regard to the environment

  • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Fuck Idaho. How about instead we go back to Washington Territorial borders and have the Evergreen State annex their whole crooked potato patch. They can have statehood back when they learn to behave themselves.

    Washington Territory 1859

  • WhatIsThePointAnyway@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just get rid of the electoral college already and stop giving these dipshit minorities a chance in hell of moving this country backwards.

  • Zyratoxx@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You know things are about to get spicy when a state/nation adds the prefix “Greater” to its name

  • dynamojoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck votes. Let them buy their way out. Once a fair value for the property, infrastructure, and future revenue is determined that value becomes the baseline for negotiations and the auction can begin. Oregon loses some freeloaders, gains a windfall, and becomes even more blue.