• AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t know if it was a California thing or not, but back in the day they used to pay you $5 a day for jury duty. The aerospace company I worked at paid full salary for jury duty days, but for a while they required your to reimburse the company for the $5/day. It sort of makes sense philosophically because you don’t need the court compensation if you’re getting guilt paid, but it always seemed kind of cheap. I think they stopped that because they realized it was costing them more to process the reimbursement than they were getting from it.

            • luckyhunter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I know in some states it’s law that if the employer agrees to pay your salary the jury duty wages may(must?) be claimed by the company as income, so they are selling your time at a loss basically. It’s meant to be an incentive for companies to do it, but at $5/day yeah that’s not worth the paper work.

              • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Agreed. Like I said it makes sense philosophically, it’s just the amount is so low it seems miserly.

                On the other hand, the company pays full salary for unlimited jury days, which I think is unusual, so I don’t think they’re being cheap at all in reality.

                • luckyhunter@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  They are just being efficient with their accountant and tax preparers time. The state policy to incentivize employers just isn’t working since there’s not enough value there. I’m a business owner with hourly employees, and as long as the program was optional and paid, oh, half the employee wages I’d be totally on board with it.

        • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          29
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The problem. The problem is there aren’t enough restrooms in the courthouse to accommodate that number of witnesses. The cost of sewage maintenance alone necessitates a delay for the trial.

          • gregorum@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Even worse, the witness stand can’t accommodate 150 witnesses at the same time!

            /s

            My goodness, does the amount of dumb things you say have no limit? 

            • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              1 year ago

              If there is a limit, I haven’t found it yet. A judge ruled today that Cheesebro and Powell will be tried together. Explain that. Can the witness stand hold 2 chairs?

  • relative_iterator@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does Trump have to be present for the whole thing? My adhd is getting triggered just thinking about sitting still for a 4 month trial. Good luck orange dude 😂

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fuck what Trump has to do. Feel bad for the 14 ish jurors who have to sit there for 4 months getting paid less than minimum wage. I’d say it’s likely they get sequestered at some point, meaning they don’t even see their families.

      • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        Those jurors are definitely going to need to be sequestered and will probably need protection too. The GOP is already openly supporting domestic terrorism so I don’t expect them to stop now.

      • CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Being jurors on this case would suck. That being said, not shitty employers often pay your full salary for jury duty. And some states require employers to pay too.

    • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Does Trump have to be present for the whole thing?

      That depends on whether the judge orders an appearance. The lawyers for Trump must be present the whole time, but Trump does not necessarily have to be there unless ordered to by the judge.

      My adhd is getting triggered just thinking about sitting still for a 4 month trial.

      It seriously sounds awful… couldn’t happen to a better person.

      • rusticus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh I love this nuclear option. If Trump won’t shut up on social media the judge will just tell him he has to be present the whole time. Lol.

  • jballs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you look at all the crimes the 18 defendants are charged with, I’d say that 150 is actually pretty freaking economical! If math is right, that’s like 4.92 indictments per witness.