___

    • frunch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Somebody had to take up the mantle since Consumer Reports cannot be trusted anymore

    • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      They keep it pretty narrow, their focus has always been very heavy in privacy. They don’t report on anything else really, just the privacy aspect.

    • Roboticide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Best way to sell a browser and software services built on privacy is to do a lot of consumer reports emphasizing the value of privacy.

      • twistypencil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is what bothers me about Mozilla. They position themselves in the privacy space, but thus far their efforts there have not been shown in their actual browser, and only in what I would call clever “green washing” or “privacy washing”. That is why things like Mullvad browser have a market, because the people who actually care about privacy and have spent time to look at what Firefox actually provides in that respect, are not particularly impressed with their “privacy” stance being realized in their product. While I applaud Mozilla for putting this article out there, as it is beneficial to raise awareness about this issue, I wish they would put as much effort into the actual privacy of Firefox as they do in their marketing around it.

    • pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Because when you’re big enough to have a recognizable brand name, it nearly unequivocally means you have to sell out to those who can fund you. Consumer Reports dropped off decades ago.