Stephanie Cosme, 32, was killed last year when she inadvertently walked into the rotating propeller of an aircraft in California

US air force civilian contractor had become disoriented recording data at an airport in California last year when she walked into a jet’s rotating propeller and was killed, officials said on Friday.

In a statement outlining the findings of a report into the contractor’s death, the air force materiel command said that 32-year-old Stephanie Cosme was mortally injured on 7 September when she inadvertently walked into the rotating propeller of an MQ-9A that was parked at Gray Butte airfield.

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s a reaper drone. The bottom of the prop is about 4 or 5 feet off the ground. I’m confident it was quick, morbid as that sounds.

      • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        8 months ago

        Grow up.

        Warfare equipment is required to defend, as well as attack. Let’s see who you’re calling evil when a would-be attacking nation waltzes in and rapes your family while you’re tied up in the corner, and then murders you like the Russians were doing to the Ukrainians.

        That woman was doing the hard work that you were unable to, because you’re too much of a bitch to accept reality.

        • Gabu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          'muricans don’t have a brain, holy shit. If you want to suck military dick so much, at least set up an onlyfans so your capitalist hellhole doesn’t fuck you quite as hard.

          • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            What are you even talking about? I don’t even care about the military–I’m just telling you that if you don’t have a weapon, the next guy who does is going to come in and make you regret it.

            I didnt make the rules–im just telling you how it is. Stop being a dumbass.

            • zerog_bandit@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              That’s what these ruzzia bots are trying to do. They want as much of the world as possible weak and undefended so they can rape it like Ukraine. Legit inhuman savages.

                • Gabu@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Funny, you seem unable to point to evidence. Or do you think, when asked about evidence of an exoplanet existing, a physicist will say “well, look at all of physics”?

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Oh look it’s the same “grow up” logic from the Genocide defenders.

          I see those reaper drones helping israel commit Genocide by mapping Gaza and bombing Yemen. They’re not doing much to defend Ukraine.

          • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Are you calling me a genocide defender? Explain.

            Why are you even suggesting that I am a genocide defendee we when the very example I gave was to help prevent a genocide in Ukraine? Lol.

            Ah, it’s probably because you don’t actually have a winning argument, and you’re just grasping at straws to defend your fantasy-hopes-and-dreams world views.

            • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              29
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Lemmy: ACAB EAT THE RICH

              Also Lemmy: why would someone say something negative about this woman working for the military to directly help them commit massive war crimes?

      • GhostFence@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        No. I’d rather the warmongers who deploy them take her place. Karma should hit the top of the hierarchy not the bottom.

  • deranger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    “Disorientated” gets me. Why not save a few letters and use “disoriented”? You don’t orientate yourself to your environment, you orient yourself.

      • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        Never thought about that. People frequently say orientate at my work (I am a stenographer) and it bothers me to no end, because it takes me longer to write orientate versus orient. But now it makes sense, British language.

          • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I dunno if I’ve heard someone say “What is your orient?” Usually more allow me to orient/orientate you to this map. I prefer orient because that’s just O-RNT in stenographer world. Orientate is O-RNT/TAEUT, with the slash representing a second stroke, so twice as much effort. I’m a low effort kinda person.

          • kase@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Btw, I don’t hear people say “orient” except as a verb, but I do sometimes hear “oriention” used the same way as “orientation.” Orientation is more common tho ¯⁠\⁠(⁠°⁠_⁠o⁠)⁠/⁠¯

      • deranger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Still doesn’t make sense to me. There’s no need for the “tate”. She was disoriented, not properly oriented. Do you say “orientate” for the verb, or “orient”?

          • deranger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            It is not uncommon for words in English to have variants which are slightly longer than they need to be, and our collective response to these words is somewhat capricious; some of them make people Very Angry (irregardlessconversatepreventative), while others (commentator) seem to elicit little more than a shrug.

            Yeah, I take issue with all of these, including commentator, despite it being commonly used. Just say commenter. They’re commenting. I don’t care for all these extra taters.

            • Cypher@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              8 months ago

              Commentator is a better fit for grammar in general speech IMO.

              On Tuesday John Doe, a commentator for the local….

              On Tuesday John Doe, a commenter for the local…

              Commenter sounds like someone made a comment as opposed to commentator which sounds like a job title. At least to me.

              • deranger@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Fair enough, you make a point with that. It serves a function there, but I still contend the tate in orientate is superfluous.

            • DelightfullyDivisive@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              IIRC, “irregardless” was added to more US dictionaries in the late 20th century. I had a coworker in the early 90s who would become viscerally angry when others would use it…so the rest of us would use it often.

        • franglais@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          There are many occasions when speaking another language (yes American English is a different language to British English imo) where you just have to say, “that’s how it is, it doesn’t make sense, but there we go”. The English took the word from the french désorienté, which means to turn away from the orient.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      For me, it was the article describing walking into the propeller of a jet. Clearly someone didn’t read this over before clicking submit

      • shottymcb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s a turboprop plane, so a jet engine driving a propeller. Definitely sounds weird when phrased like that though.

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s like how for awhile there you would hear the phrase “jet helicopter.” Meaning a helicopter powered by a turboshaft engine, like the Huey. You don’t hear that very often these days because there’s virtually no helicopters in significant service with reciprocating engines that aren’t made by Robinson.

        • Gabu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          26
          ·
          8 months ago

          If anything, it’s the US that is prescritivist. You decided to change half of your words for no freaking reason.

              • Daxtron2@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Prescriptivism is assigning rules to language as opposed to descriptivism which takes language as is and analyzes it. You saying American English decided to change half of their words for no reason is a classic prescriptivist stance, ignoring the fact that the language diverged due to distance and loss of shared culture. Not to mention many American spellings and pronunciations are closer to the originals before the split than Modern British English is :)

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Actually we had a reason, back in the colonial era printers charged by the letter. Hence a lot of words became simplified, solder keeping its silent l is a bit weird though. Also solder is pronounced soder, the English latinized their dialect awhile back for some fucken reason.

              • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                In solder the l is silent, the Romans pronounced it with an l but by the time it got to English it had been dropped. Blame the French. Frankly Latinizing a dialect seems a hell of a lot harder than just changing the spelling to sauder, soder, or sodder which I have seen as acceptable alternatives to the frankly weird solder.

                • TwanHE@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I’ve never heard it spoken without the l. Neither in England nor here in the Netherlands.

                • cyrl@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  10 years in electronics, and I’m yet to hear solder once despite working for an international firm.

            • force@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Soldier is pronounced with an /l/ in most English dialects. I actually can’t think of a major variety where it isn’t.

            • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              It’s an abbreviation of “association football”.

              Why Americans would call gridiron football when it involves neither feet nor balls, now, that truly boggles the mind.

              • stoicmaverick@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                It USED to involve a lot more kicking than it currently does. The rules have changed considerably over the years, but the name never did. That’s the reason if you were actually curious.

            • Gabu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              First, why would I care? Second, I do know where it comes from. Third, how does futball relate to the discussion?

            • Gabu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              8 months ago

              Nearly every word with a “ou” diphthong, “s” into “z” or vice-versa, “c” into “s”, the swap of “-re” for “-er”, etc.

              • force@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Nearly every word with a “ou” diphthong

                Not a diphthong. A digraph. Either way American English didn’t “change” this, the now-prevailing British and American standards just standardized different spellings.

                “s” into “z” or vice-versa, “c” into “s”, the swap of “-re” for “-er”, etc.

                I assume you’re referencing words like realize/realise, defense/defence, maneuver/maneouvre. In which case same thing as for o/ou, Americans didn’t “change” this. These were spellings that were already common throughout Middle English; American and British varietes of English just happened to diverge around the time of the printing press (because the printing press was introduced to the English right at the beginning of colonization of the Americas) and they adopted different standards based on the many, MANY spellings already in use.

                Saying the Americans were [more] “prescriptivist” because common standard spellings in the US and common standard spellings in the UK are different is… a take, for sure.

                • Gabu@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Not a diphthong. A digraph.

                  Ah, yes, I love the flavo-ur of tomatoes. Their odo-ur is quite nice.

                  The “ou” digraph was only merged as a single “o” where it represents a diphthong. Way to instantly discredit yourself.

  • EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    8 months ago

    Why was a civilian allowed to record around active jets and expected to safely lead themselves? Pokémon go had to warn people not to walk off cliffs and into traffic, but the Air Force is accessory to this without having someone to watch her movements and nothing?

    • bhmnscmm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Her job was to be on active tarmac near running aircraft. She isn’t some random person that shouldn’t have been there.

      It appears she wasn’t paying attention and people tried to stop her from walking into the propeller.

      “Others began shouting and waving to get [Cosme’s] attention as well,” the report said. It added: “Without looking up to determine her position relative to the aircraft, [Cosme] proceeded to walk directly into the propeller … sustaining fatal injuries.”

      • John_McMurray@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Probably an accident due to familiarity. Some guy off the street is gonna pay attention around a running airplane, someone been working around them for years might just get distracted.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Over-familiarity and comfort is a major cause of accidents.

          I do a lot of woodworking, and the most dangerous things are repetitive tasks. Make the same simple cut 200 times in a row on a table saw, and it gets more dangerous as you get in the groove, not less.