With a electoral system like Ranked Choice voting, people would feel safe to vote for whomsoever they wish, as their vote would still be counted even if their preference didn’t win.

Just search for videos on FPTP voting if you want an explanation on how and why the spoiler effect exists.

Electoral reform is possible in each individual state (for now), we dont need federal reform! Maine and Alaska have already passed electoral reform.

Republicans are moving to make alternative electoral systems illegal in their states. Republicans LOVE first past the post voting. Just sbsolutely adore it. Why would you want to use the same voting system republicans want?

More political parties means a higher percentage of the population is represented by their choices in the voting booth. More people involved in the electoral process, more people engaged.

Its a win win win all around for not just the people, but also for the democratic party. More people voting means more democratic votes. The numbers dont lie. So what’s the hold up blue states?

Some day we will be able to vote for who best represents our interests. We won’t need to grovel on our knees, begging for representationin government. We won’t need to wait for the Republican party to stop existing.

We can do it right now. We don’t have to get over a damn thing. If anyone needs to get over themselves, it would be the democrats who assume they are the only way forward.

Consider starting a campaign to change how we vote in your own state! Force our representatives to compete with fresh outside ideas. We deserve the best representation, not excuses.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    143
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    8 months ago

    Please go away, get out of public life and stop “helping.”

    Being a dick to people is not going to get them to vote your way. Same with the ‘deplorables’ comment. I agreed with her on it, but it was a stupid thing to say in an election.

    • Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m still convinced that only person insufferable enough to lose to Donald fucking Trump in 2016 was Hillary Clinton.

      You can hate it all you want but in some level it’s a popularity contest and she is utterly utterly unlikeable.

      Her smarmy q&a with those millennials was a fucking PR nightmare.

  • distantsounds@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    8 months ago

    Hilary propped up Trump. Never forget that. The political turmoil we are currently in is directly because or her. Fuck her and the DNC

  • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Two things can be true at the same time.

    1. She is a target of mysgonstic flavored consisparcy theories.

    2. She truly is unlikeable with half measure policies while being woefully out of touch with the average person.

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    She really just needs to get over herself and shut the fuck up. She lost to Trump. Why the fuck would anyone listen to her on how to beat him?

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    She needs to learn to shut the fuck up, because she doesn’t help.

    This is like telling your SO to ‘just calm down’ when they’re really angry about something.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    As the one and only person to ever lose to Trump, ya might want to sit this one out.

    Hillary has value as a lightning rod for right-wing hatred. All she has to do is show her face and the rednecks will lose their mind. She should be talking about things like Benghazi or emails - troll the trumpanzees with shit they won’t be able to resist, and keep em off the rest of the blue team’s back.

    Her chiming in on pretty much any other topic just weighs it down with per perceived baggage.

  • jeffw@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    Like “basket of deplorables,” she’s not wrong. She just shouldn’t be saying it because it can only really hurt things

  • elbucho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    Right message, very much the wrong messenger. Like it or not, Hillary, a significant number of people in this country despise you. I don’t think that’s at all fair, but them’s the breaks. You’re not helping.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      “Shut up, you’re voting for who we want you to vote for because we say so” is never the right message. Centrists will never think of another one.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        How apropos… Confidently telling everyone why Hilary is wrong while clearly not even reading the article. Classic.

      • elbucho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        That wasn’t really the message. The message is more: “Please stop with the hyperbole. You know that Donald Trump is the worst possible candidate imaginable.” Which is absolutely true.

        • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Ok? Then Biden should be begging for votes, doing anything within his power to get progressive and leftist votes and telling moderates and liberals to get over themselves.

          No? Oh so just more of the same finger wagging from the usual suspects convinced that one more lecture should do the trick.

          • elbucho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            I mean, I agree it would be great if Biden was a better candidate. I’d be a whole lot less worried about a second Trump presidency if that were the case. But he’s not a better candidate. He is who he is. And though he hasn’t earned your vote, you should give it to him anyway because it’s in your best interest to do so.

            • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              you should give it to him anyway because it’s in your best interest to do so.

              No.

              Focus your lectures on moderates and liberals for once in your goddamn life. I’m done being held to a different standard.

              • elbucho@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Ok, so what’s your solution, then? Actually - first, let’s make sure we’re on the same page about the basics: do you agree that Donald Trump would be fundamentally worse for America than Joe Biden? Second, do you agree that any candidate other than the winners of the Democratic and Republican primaries basically stands no chance of becoming president?

                • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  Again, ask moderates and liberals that question. And then ask them if Trump is such a danger why didn’t they fume at Biden for blocking the rail strike? Or raising the defense budget? Or forcing federal workers back to the office? Or going around Congress to ship weapons to Gaza? Why didn’t they do anything in support of progressives and leftists for the past three years?

                  Why is it the people who have gotten fucked over by Biden are being told to vote for him rather than telling Biden, moderate voters and liberal voters they cannot win elections on their own and thus they must make material compromises with the people they’re depending on?

                  You’re trying to squeeze blood from a stone here. I’m telling you I’m done propping up procorporate trash candidates for moderate and liberal voters. If they would rather lose to MAGA than make material compromises with leftists and progressives that’s on them.

                  If Biden really believes Trump is such a a danger then he should be on his knees begging for votes. Or is his ego worth more than democracy?

        • Garbanzo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          You know that Donald Trump is the worst possible candidate imaginable.

          Yes, I know that. That’s why I changed my voter registration to Republican and voted for Nikki Haley in the primaries. I don’t particularly like her, but she’s better than the worst possible candidate imaginable. Trump could have been kicked to the curb but I guess the uncommitted protest vote against Biden was more important.

    • pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Horrendous, insulting, out of touch phrasing from her as usual too. The democrats spending years propping her up and then stacking the deck in her favor in the primary are why we had Trump as president. She was the only person predicted to lose to him.

    • ashok36@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Obama could get away with telling potential voters to get over themselves. Clinton has none of the cachet that Obama or even Biden to a less extent has. She should be embarrassed to show her face in public at this point.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      She’s saying what every lemmy Centrist has been saying, only with less condescension and she managed to say it without calling anyone a Russian.

      I’m surprised she’s getting so much hate. Maybe she’s not being entitled enough and centrists perceive her as being to their left.

  • Tolstoshev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    Hillary was the only candidate unlikeable enough to lose to Trump. She should stick that in her pipe and smoke it.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    If she’s jaded about the whole thing, can’t say I blame her. If the dems had pushed to get rid of the stupid electoral college after Gore’s “loss” she might have been president.

    • Altofaltception@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      To be fair, I don’t think she would have made a good president even if the electoral college didn’t exist. She would have been better than Trump but that’s not saying much, because a shit sandwich is better than Trump.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      That would have taken a Constitutional amendment and I don’t think that would have been possible any time within the last 24 years.

      The Democrats never had anywhere near the majority needed and I doubt enough states would be willing to ratify it if they did.

      I think the electoral college is stupid and archaic, but I also think we’re stuck with it for the foreseeable future.

      • Omega@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        There’s a workaround that several states have signed on for. Your state allocates all of the electoral votes to the winner of the popular vote. But they only do it once enough states sign on to make a majority.

          • Omega@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I think best case is that you get enough purple states to sign on. But either way, it’s a lot more feasible than an amendment.

      • reddig33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        You ever know until you try. They couldn’t even be bothered to get behind the idea. It’s bitten them in the ass repeatedly.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          I think they did know, which is why they didn’t try. You need 2/3 of both houses of congress and a ratification by 3/4 of the states. There has been no time between 2000 and 2024 when that would have had the remotest chance of happening. All they would have done would be to waste taxpayer dollars on something performative.

          Like I said, I don’t like the electoral college and I wish we didn’t have it, but we’re stuck with it.